| //! Trait Resolution. See the [rustc dev guide] for more information on how this works. | |
| //! | |
| //! [rustc dev guide]: https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/traits/resolution.html | |
| pub mod auto_trait; | |
| pub(crate) mod coherence; | |
| pub mod const_evaluatable; | |
| mod dyn_compatibility; | |
| pub mod effects; | |
| mod engine; | |
| mod fulfill; | |
| pub mod misc; | |
| pub mod normalize; | |
| pub mod outlives_bounds; | |
| pub mod project; | |
| pub mod query; | |
| #[allow(hidden_glob_reexports)] | |
| mod select; | |
| pub mod specialize; | |
| mod structural_normalize; | |
| #[allow(hidden_glob_reexports)] | |
| mod util; | |
| pub mod vtable; | |
| pub mod wf; | |
| use std::fmt::Debug; | |
| use std::ops::ControlFlow; | |
| use rustc_errors::ErrorGuaranteed; | |
| use rustc_hir::def::DefKind; | |
| pub use rustc_infer::traits::*; | |
| use rustc_macros::TypeVisitable; | |
| use rustc_middle::query::Providers; | |
| use rustc_middle::span_bug; | |
| use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError}; | |
| use rustc_middle::ty::{ | |
| self, GenericArgs, GenericArgsRef, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeFolder, TypeSuperFoldable, | |
| TypeSuperVisitable, TypeVisitable, TypeVisitableExt, TypingMode, Upcast, | |
| }; | |
| use rustc_span::Span; | |
| use rustc_span::def_id::DefId; | |
| use tracing::{debug, instrument}; | |
| pub use self::coherence::{ | |
| InCrate, IsFirstInputType, OrphanCheckErr, OrphanCheckMode, OverlapResult, UncoveredTyParams, | |
| add_placeholder_note, orphan_check_trait_ref, overlapping_inherent_impls, | |
| overlapping_trait_impls, | |
| }; | |
| pub use self::dyn_compatibility::{ | |
| DynCompatibilityViolation, dyn_compatibility_violations_for_assoc_item, | |
| hir_ty_lowering_dyn_compatibility_violations, is_vtable_safe_method, | |
| }; | |
| pub use self::engine::{ObligationCtxt, TraitEngineExt}; | |
| pub use self::fulfill::{FulfillmentContext, OldSolverError, PendingPredicateObligation}; | |
| pub use self::normalize::NormalizeExt; | |
| pub use self::project::{normalize_inherent_projection, normalize_projection_term}; | |
| pub use self::select::{ | |
| EvaluationCache, EvaluationResult, IntercrateAmbiguityCause, OverflowError, SelectionCache, | |
| SelectionContext, | |
| }; | |
| pub use self::specialize::specialization_graph::{ | |
| FutureCompatOverlapError, FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind, | |
| }; | |
| pub use self::specialize::{ | |
| OverlapError, specialization_graph, translate_args, translate_args_with_cause, | |
| }; | |
| pub use self::structural_normalize::StructurallyNormalizeExt; | |
| pub use self::util::{ | |
| BoundVarReplacer, PlaceholderReplacer, elaborate, expand_trait_aliases, impl_item_is_final, | |
| sizedness_fast_path, supertrait_def_ids, supertraits, transitive_bounds_that_define_assoc_item, | |
| upcast_choices, with_replaced_escaping_bound_vars, | |
| }; | |
| use crate::error_reporting::InferCtxtErrorExt; | |
| use crate::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment; | |
| use crate::infer::{InferCtxt, TyCtxtInferExt}; | |
| use crate::regions::InferCtxtRegionExt; | |
| use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt as _; | |
| #[derive(Debug, TypeVisitable)] | |
| pub struct FulfillmentError<'tcx> { | |
| pub obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>, | |
| pub code: FulfillmentErrorCode<'tcx>, | |
| /// Diagnostics only: the 'root' obligation which resulted in | |
| /// the failure to process `obligation`. This is the obligation | |
| /// that was initially passed to `register_predicate_obligation` | |
| pub root_obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>, | |
| } | |
| impl<'tcx> FulfillmentError<'tcx> { | |
| pub fn new( | |
| obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>, | |
| code: FulfillmentErrorCode<'tcx>, | |
| root_obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>, | |
| ) -> FulfillmentError<'tcx> { | |
| FulfillmentError { obligation, code, root_obligation } | |
| } | |
| pub fn is_true_error(&self) -> bool { | |
| match self.code { | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Select(_) | |
| | FulfillmentErrorCode::Project(_) | |
| | FulfillmentErrorCode::Subtype(_, _) | |
| | FulfillmentErrorCode::ConstEquate(_, _) => true, | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Cycle(_) | FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: _ } => { | |
| false | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| #[derive(Clone, TypeVisitable)] | |
| pub enum FulfillmentErrorCode<'tcx> { | |
| /// Inherently impossible to fulfill; this trait is implemented if and only | |
| /// if it is already implemented. | |
| Cycle(PredicateObligations<'tcx>), | |
| Select(SelectionError<'tcx>), | |
| Project(MismatchedProjectionTypes<'tcx>), | |
| Subtype(ExpectedFound<Ty<'tcx>>, TypeError<'tcx>), // always comes from a SubtypePredicate | |
| ConstEquate(ExpectedFound<ty::Const<'tcx>>, TypeError<'tcx>), | |
| Ambiguity { | |
| /// Overflow is only `Some(suggest_recursion_limit)` when using the next generation | |
| /// trait solver `-Znext-solver`. With the old solver overflow is eagerly handled by | |
| /// emitting a fatal error instead. | |
| overflow: Option<bool>, | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| impl<'tcx> Debug for FulfillmentErrorCode<'tcx> { | |
| fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | |
| match *self { | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Select(ref e) => write!(f, "{e:?}"), | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Project(ref e) => write!(f, "{e:?}"), | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Subtype(ref a, ref b) => { | |
| write!(f, "CodeSubtypeError({a:?}, {b:?})") | |
| } | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::ConstEquate(ref a, ref b) => { | |
| write!(f, "CodeConstEquateError({a:?}, {b:?})") | |
| } | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: None } => write!(f, "Ambiguity"), | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: Some(suggest_increasing_limit) } => { | |
| write!(f, "Overflow({suggest_increasing_limit})") | |
| } | |
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Cycle(ref cycle) => write!(f, "Cycle({cycle:?})"), | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Whether to skip the leak check, as part of a future compatibility warning step. | |
| /// | |
| /// The "default" for skip-leak-check corresponds to the current | |
| /// behavior (do not skip the leak check) -- not the behavior we are | |
| /// transitioning into. | |
| #[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug, Default)] | |
| pub enum SkipLeakCheck { | |
| Yes, | |
| #[default] | |
| No, | |
| } | |
| impl SkipLeakCheck { | |
| fn is_yes(self) -> bool { | |
| self == SkipLeakCheck::Yes | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// The mode that trait queries run in. | |
| #[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)] | |
| pub enum TraitQueryMode { | |
| /// Standard/un-canonicalized queries get accurate | |
| /// spans etc. passed in and hence can do reasonable | |
| /// error reporting on their own. | |
| Standard, | |
| /// Canonical queries get dummy spans and hence | |
| /// must generally propagate errors to | |
| /// pre-canonicalization callsites. | |
| Canonical, | |
| } | |
| /// Creates predicate obligations from the generic bounds. | |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(cause, param_env))] | |
| pub fn predicates_for_generics<'tcx>( | |
| cause: impl Fn(usize, Span) -> ObligationCause<'tcx>, | |
| param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| generic_bounds: ty::InstantiatedPredicates<'tcx>, | |
| ) -> impl Iterator<Item = PredicateObligation<'tcx>> { | |
| generic_bounds.into_iter().enumerate().map(move |(idx, (clause, span))| Obligation { | |
| cause: cause(idx, span), | |
| recursion_depth: 0, | |
| param_env, | |
| predicate: clause.as_predicate(), | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| /// Determines whether the type `ty` is known to meet `bound` and | |
| /// returns true if so. Returns false if `ty` either does not meet | |
| /// `bound` or is not known to meet bound (note that this is | |
| /// conservative towards *no impl*, which is the opposite of the | |
| /// `evaluate` methods). | |
| pub fn type_known_to_meet_bound_modulo_regions<'tcx>( | |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| ty: Ty<'tcx>, | |
| def_id: DefId, | |
| ) -> bool { | |
| let trait_ref = ty::TraitRef::new(infcx.tcx, def_id, [ty]); | |
| pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions(infcx, param_env, trait_ref) | |
| } | |
| /// FIXME(@lcnr): this function doesn't seem right and shouldn't exist? | |
| /// | |
| /// Ping me on zulip if you want to use this method and need help with finding | |
| /// an appropriate replacement. | |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(infcx, param_env, pred), ret)] | |
| fn pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions<'tcx>( | |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| pred: impl Upcast<TyCtxt<'tcx>, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, | |
| ) -> bool { | |
| let obligation = Obligation::new(infcx.tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, pred); | |
| let result = infcx.evaluate_obligation_no_overflow(&obligation); | |
| debug!(?result); | |
| if result.must_apply_modulo_regions() { | |
| true | |
| } else if result.may_apply() && !infcx.next_trait_solver() { | |
| // Sometimes obligations are ambiguous because the recursive evaluator | |
| // is not smart enough, so we fall back to fulfillment when we're not certain | |
| // that an obligation holds or not. Even still, we must make sure that | |
| // the we do no inference in the process of checking this obligation. | |
| let goal = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible((obligation.predicate, obligation.param_env)); | |
| infcx.probe(|_| { | |
| let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx); | |
| ocx.register_obligation(obligation); | |
| let errors = ocx.evaluate_obligations_error_on_ambiguity(); | |
| match errors.as_slice() { | |
| // Only known to hold if we did no inference. | |
| [] => infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(goal) == goal, | |
| errors => { | |
| debug!(?errors); | |
| false | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| } else { | |
| false | |
| } | |
| } | |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx, elaborated_env))] | |
| fn do_normalize_predicates<'tcx>( | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>, | |
| elaborated_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| predicates: Vec<ty::Clause<'tcx>>, | |
| ) -> Result<Vec<ty::Clause<'tcx>>, ErrorGuaranteed> { | |
| let span = cause.span; | |
| // FIXME. We should really... do something with these region | |
| // obligations. But this call just continues the older | |
| // behavior (i.e., doesn't cause any new bugs), and it would | |
| // take some further refactoring to actually solve them. In | |
| // particular, we would have to handle implied bounds | |
| // properly, and that code is currently largely confined to | |
| // regionck (though I made some efforts to extract it | |
| // out). -nmatsakis | |
| // | |
| // @arielby: In any case, these obligations are checked | |
| // by wfcheck anyway, so I'm not sure we have to check | |
| // them here too, and we will remove this function when | |
| // we move over to lazy normalization *anyway*. | |
| let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().ignoring_regions().build(TypingMode::non_body_analysis()); | |
| let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new_with_diagnostics(&infcx); | |
| let predicates = ocx.normalize(&cause, elaborated_env, predicates); | |
| let errors = ocx.evaluate_obligations_error_on_ambiguity(); | |
| if !errors.is_empty() { | |
| let reported = infcx.err_ctxt().report_fulfillment_errors(errors); | |
| return Err(reported); | |
| } | |
| debug!("do_normalize_predicates: normalized predicates = {:?}", predicates); | |
| // We can use the `elaborated_env` here; the region code only | |
| // cares about declarations like `'a: 'b`. | |
| // FIXME: It's very weird that we ignore region obligations but apparently | |
| // still need to use `resolve_regions` as we need the resolved regions in | |
| // the normalized predicates. | |
| let errors = infcx.resolve_regions(cause.body_id, elaborated_env, []); | |
| if !errors.is_empty() { | |
| tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug( | |
| span, | |
| format!("failed region resolution while normalizing {elaborated_env:?}: {errors:?}"), | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| match infcx.fully_resolve(predicates) { | |
| Ok(predicates) => Ok(predicates), | |
| Err(fixup_err) => { | |
| // If we encounter a fixup error, it means that some type | |
| // variable wound up unconstrained. I actually don't know | |
| // if this can happen, and I certainly don't expect it to | |
| // happen often, but if it did happen it probably | |
| // represents a legitimate failure due to some kind of | |
| // unconstrained variable. | |
| // | |
| // @lcnr: Let's still ICE here for now. I want a test case | |
| // for that. | |
| span_bug!( | |
| span, | |
| "inference variables in normalized parameter environment: {}", | |
| fixup_err | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // FIXME: this is gonna need to be removed ... | |
| /// Normalizes the parameter environment, reporting errors if they occur. | |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx))] | |
| pub fn normalize_param_env_or_error<'tcx>( | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| unnormalized_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>, | |
| ) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> { | |
| // I'm not wild about reporting errors here; I'd prefer to | |
| // have the errors get reported at a defined place (e.g., | |
| // during typeck). Instead I have all parameter | |
| // environments, in effect, going through this function | |
| // and hence potentially reporting errors. This ensures of | |
| // course that we never forget to normalize (the | |
| // alternative seemed like it would involve a lot of | |
| // manual invocations of this fn -- and then we'd have to | |
| // deal with the errors at each of those sites). | |
| // | |
| // In any case, in practice, typeck constructs all the | |
| // parameter environments once for every fn as it goes, | |
| // and errors will get reported then; so outside of type inference we | |
| // can be sure that no errors should occur. | |
| let mut predicates: Vec<_> = util::elaborate( | |
| tcx, | |
| unnormalized_env.caller_bounds().into_iter().map(|predicate| { | |
| if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs() || tcx.next_trait_solver_globally() { | |
| return predicate; | |
| } | |
| struct ConstNormalizer<'tcx>(TyCtxt<'tcx>); | |
| impl<'tcx> TypeFolder<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ConstNormalizer<'tcx> { | |
| fn cx(&self) -> TyCtxt<'tcx> { | |
| self.0 | |
| } | |
| fn fold_const(&mut self, c: ty::Const<'tcx>) -> ty::Const<'tcx> { | |
| // FIXME(return_type_notation): track binders in this normalizer, as | |
| // `ty::Const::normalize` can only work with properly preserved binders. | |
| if c.has_escaping_bound_vars() { | |
| return ty::Const::new_misc_error(self.0); | |
| } | |
| // While it is pretty sus to be evaluating things with an empty param env, it | |
| // should actually be okay since without `feature(generic_const_exprs)` the only | |
| // const arguments that have a non-empty param env are array repeat counts. These | |
| // do not appear in the type system though. | |
| if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(uv) = c.kind() | |
| && self.0.def_kind(uv.def) == DefKind::AnonConst | |
| { | |
| let infcx = self.0.infer_ctxt().build(TypingMode::non_body_analysis()); | |
| let c = evaluate_const(&infcx, c, ty::ParamEnv::empty()); | |
| // We should never wind up with any `infcx` local state when normalizing anon consts | |
| // under min const generics. | |
| assert!(!c.has_infer() && !c.has_placeholders()); | |
| return c; | |
| } | |
| c | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // This whole normalization step is a hack to work around the fact that | |
| // `normalize_param_env_or_error` is fundamentally broken from using an | |
| // unnormalized param env with a trait solver that expects the param env | |
| // to be normalized. | |
| // | |
| // When normalizing the param env we can end up evaluating obligations | |
| // that have been normalized but can only be proven via a where clause | |
| // which is still in its unnormalized form. example: | |
| // | |
| // Attempting to prove `T: Trait<<u8 as Identity>::Assoc>` in a param env | |
| // with a `T: Trait<<u8 as Identity>::Assoc>` where clause will fail because | |
| // we first normalize obligations before proving them so we end up proving | |
| // `T: Trait<u8>`. Since lazy normalization is not implemented equating `u8` | |
| // with `<u8 as Identity>::Assoc` fails outright so we incorrectly believe that | |
| // we cannot prove `T: Trait<u8>`. | |
| // | |
| // The same thing is true for const generics- attempting to prove | |
| // `T: Trait<ConstKind::Unevaluated(...)>` with the same thing as a where clauses | |
| // will fail. After normalization we may be attempting to prove `T: Trait<4>` with | |
| // the unnormalized where clause `T: Trait<ConstKind::Unevaluated(...)>`. In order | |
| // for the obligation to hold `4` must be equal to `ConstKind::Unevaluated(...)` | |
| // but as we do not have lazy norm implemented, equating the two consts fails outright. | |
| // | |
| // Ideally we would not normalize consts here at all but it is required for backwards | |
| // compatibility. Eventually when lazy norm is implemented this can just be removed. | |
| // We do not normalize types here as there is no backwards compatibility requirement | |
| // for us to do so. | |
| predicate.fold_with(&mut ConstNormalizer(tcx)) | |
| }), | |
| ) | |
| .collect(); | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: elaborated-predicates={:?}", predicates); | |
| let elaborated_env = ty::ParamEnv::new(tcx.mk_clauses(&predicates)); | |
| if !elaborated_env.has_aliases() { | |
| return elaborated_env; | |
| } | |
| // HACK: we are trying to normalize the param-env inside *itself*. The problem is that | |
| // normalization expects its param-env to be already normalized, which means we have | |
| // a circularity. | |
| // | |
| // The way we handle this is by normalizing the param-env inside an unnormalized version | |
| // of the param-env, which means that if the param-env contains unnormalized projections, | |
| // we'll have some normalization failures. This is unfortunate. | |
| // | |
| // Lazy normalization would basically handle this by treating just the | |
| // normalizing-a-trait-ref-requires-itself cycles as evaluation failures. | |
| // | |
| // Inferred outlives bounds can create a lot of `TypeOutlives` predicates for associated | |
| // types, so to make the situation less bad, we normalize all the predicates *but* | |
| // the `TypeOutlives` predicates first inside the unnormalized parameter environment, and | |
| // then we normalize the `TypeOutlives` bounds inside the normalized parameter environment. | |
| // | |
| // This works fairly well because trait matching does not actually care about param-env | |
| // TypeOutlives predicates - these are normally used by regionck. | |
| let outlives_predicates: Vec<_> = predicates | |
| .extract_if(.., |predicate| { | |
| matches!(predicate.kind().skip_binder(), ty::ClauseKind::TypeOutlives(..)) | |
| }) | |
| .collect(); | |
| debug!( | |
| "normalize_param_env_or_error: predicates=(non-outlives={:?}, outlives={:?})", | |
| predicates, outlives_predicates | |
| ); | |
| let Ok(non_outlives_predicates) = | |
| do_normalize_predicates(tcx, cause.clone(), elaborated_env, predicates) | |
| else { | |
| // An unnormalized env is better than nothing. | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: errored resolving non-outlives predicates"); | |
| return elaborated_env; | |
| }; | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: non-outlives predicates={:?}", non_outlives_predicates); | |
| // Not sure whether it is better to include the unnormalized TypeOutlives predicates | |
| // here. I believe they should not matter, because we are ignoring TypeOutlives param-env | |
| // predicates here anyway. Keeping them here anyway because it seems safer. | |
| let outlives_env = non_outlives_predicates.iter().chain(&outlives_predicates).cloned(); | |
| let outlives_env = ty::ParamEnv::new(tcx.mk_clauses_from_iter(outlives_env)); | |
| let Ok(outlives_predicates) = | |
| do_normalize_predicates(tcx, cause, outlives_env, outlives_predicates) | |
| else { | |
| // An unnormalized env is better than nothing. | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: errored resolving outlives predicates"); | |
| return elaborated_env; | |
| }; | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: outlives predicates={:?}", outlives_predicates); | |
| let mut predicates = non_outlives_predicates; | |
| predicates.extend(outlives_predicates); | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: final predicates={:?}", predicates); | |
| ty::ParamEnv::new(tcx.mk_clauses(&predicates)) | |
| } | |
| /// Deeply normalize the param env using the next solver ignoring | |
| /// region errors. | |
| /// | |
| /// FIXME(-Zhigher-ranked-assumptions): this is a hack to work around | |
| /// the fact that we don't support placeholder assumptions right now | |
| /// and is necessary for `compare_method_predicate_entailment`, see the | |
| /// use of this function for more info. We should remove this once we | |
| /// have proper support for implied bounds on binders. | |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx))] | |
| pub fn deeply_normalize_param_env_ignoring_regions<'tcx>( | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| unnormalized_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>, | |
| ) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> { | |
| let predicates: Vec<_> = | |
| util::elaborate(tcx, unnormalized_env.caller_bounds().into_iter()).collect(); | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: elaborated-predicates={:?}", predicates); | |
| let elaborated_env = ty::ParamEnv::new(tcx.mk_clauses(&predicates)); | |
| if !elaborated_env.has_aliases() { | |
| return elaborated_env; | |
| } | |
| let span = cause.span; | |
| let infcx = tcx | |
| .infer_ctxt() | |
| .with_next_trait_solver(true) | |
| .ignoring_regions() | |
| .build(TypingMode::non_body_analysis()); | |
| let predicates = match crate::solve::deeply_normalize::<_, FulfillmentError<'tcx>>( | |
| infcx.at(&cause, elaborated_env), | |
| predicates, | |
| ) { | |
| Ok(predicates) => predicates, | |
| Err(errors) => { | |
| infcx.err_ctxt().report_fulfillment_errors(errors); | |
| // An unnormalized env is better than nothing. | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: errored resolving predicates"); | |
| return elaborated_env; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| debug!("do_normalize_predicates: normalized predicates = {:?}", predicates); | |
| // FIXME(-Zhigher-ranked-assumptions): We're ignoring region errors for now. | |
| // There're placeholder constraints `leaking` out. | |
| // See the fixme in the enclosing function's docs for more. | |
| let _errors = infcx.resolve_regions(cause.body_id, elaborated_env, []); | |
| let predicates = match infcx.fully_resolve(predicates) { | |
| Ok(predicates) => predicates, | |
| Err(fixup_err) => { | |
| span_bug!( | |
| span, | |
| "inference variables in normalized parameter environment: {}", | |
| fixup_err | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| debug!("normalize_param_env_or_error: final predicates={:?}", predicates); | |
| ty::ParamEnv::new(tcx.mk_clauses(&predicates)) | |
| } | |
| #[derive(Debug)] | |
| pub enum EvaluateConstErr { | |
| /// The constant being evaluated was either a generic parameter or inference variable, *or*, | |
| /// some unevaluated constant with either generic parameters or inference variables in its | |
| /// generic arguments. | |
| HasGenericsOrInfers, | |
| /// The type this constant evaluated to is not valid for use in const generics. This should | |
| /// always result in an error when checking the constant is correctly typed for the parameter | |
| /// it is an argument to, so a bug is delayed when encountering this. | |
| InvalidConstParamTy(ErrorGuaranteed), | |
| /// CTFE failed to evaluate the constant in some unrecoverable way (e.g. encountered a `panic!`). | |
| /// This is also used when the constant was already tainted by error. | |
| EvaluationFailure(ErrorGuaranteed), | |
| } | |
| // FIXME(BoxyUwU): Private this once we `generic_const_exprs` isn't doing its own normalization routine | |
| // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): Consider accepting a `ty::UnevaluatedConst` when we are not rolling our own | |
| // normalization scheme | |
| /// Evaluates a type system constant returning a `ConstKind::Error` in cases where CTFE failed and | |
| /// returning the passed in constant if it was not fully concrete (i.e. depended on generic parameters | |
| /// or inference variables) | |
| /// | |
| /// You should not call this function unless you are implementing normalization itself. Prefer to use | |
| /// `normalize_erasing_regions` or the `normalize` functions on `ObligationCtxt`/`FnCtxt`/`InferCtxt`. | |
| pub fn evaluate_const<'tcx>( | |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| ct: ty::Const<'tcx>, | |
| param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| ) -> ty::Const<'tcx> { | |
| match try_evaluate_const(infcx, ct, param_env) { | |
| Ok(ct) => ct, | |
| Err(EvaluateConstErr::EvaluationFailure(e) | EvaluateConstErr::InvalidConstParamTy(e)) => { | |
| ty::Const::new_error(infcx.tcx, e) | |
| } | |
| Err(EvaluateConstErr::HasGenericsOrInfers) => ct, | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // FIXME(BoxyUwU): Private this once we `generic_const_exprs` isn't doing its own normalization routine | |
| // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): Consider accepting a `ty::UnevaluatedConst` when we are not rolling our own | |
| // normalization scheme | |
| /// Evaluates a type system constant making sure to not allow constants that depend on generic parameters | |
| /// or inference variables to succeed in evaluating. | |
| /// | |
| /// You should not call this function unless you are implementing normalization itself. Prefer to use | |
| /// `normalize_erasing_regions` or the `normalize` functions on `ObligationCtxt`/`FnCtxt`/`InferCtxt`. | |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(infcx), ret)] | |
| pub fn try_evaluate_const<'tcx>( | |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| ct: ty::Const<'tcx>, | |
| param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
| ) -> Result<ty::Const<'tcx>, EvaluateConstErr> { | |
| let tcx = infcx.tcx; | |
| let ct = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(ct); | |
| debug!(?ct); | |
| match ct.kind() { | |
| ty::ConstKind::Value(..) => Ok(ct), | |
| ty::ConstKind::Error(e) => Err(EvaluateConstErr::EvaluationFailure(e)), | |
| ty::ConstKind::Param(_) | |
| | ty::ConstKind::Infer(_) | |
| | ty::ConstKind::Bound(_, _) | |
| | ty::ConstKind::Placeholder(_) | |
| | ty::ConstKind::Expr(_) => Err(EvaluateConstErr::HasGenericsOrInfers), | |
| ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(uv) => { | |
| let opt_anon_const_kind = | |
| (tcx.def_kind(uv.def) == DefKind::AnonConst).then(|| tcx.anon_const_kind(uv.def)); | |
| // Postpone evaluation of constants that depend on generic parameters or | |
| // inference variables. | |
| // | |
| // We use `TypingMode::PostAnalysis` here which is not *technically* correct | |
| // to be revealing opaque types here as borrowcheck has not run yet. However, | |
| // CTFE itself uses `TypingMode::PostAnalysis` unconditionally even during | |
| // typeck and not doing so has a lot of (undesirable) fallout (#101478, #119821). | |
| // As a result we always use a revealed env when resolving the instance to evaluate. | |
| // | |
| // FIXME: `const_eval_resolve_for_typeck` should probably just modify the env itself | |
| // instead of having this logic here | |
| let (args, typing_env) = match opt_anon_const_kind { | |
| // We handle `generic_const_exprs` separately as reasonable ways of handling constants in the type system | |
| // completely fall apart under `generic_const_exprs` and makes this whole function Really hard to reason | |
| // about if you have to consider gce whatsoever. | |
| Some(ty::AnonConstKind::GCE) => { | |
| if uv.has_non_region_infer() || uv.has_non_region_param() { | |
| // `feature(generic_const_exprs)` causes anon consts to inherit all parent generics. This can cause | |
| // inference variables and generic parameters to show up in `ty::Const` even though the anon const | |
| // does not actually make use of them. We handle this case specially and attempt to evaluate anyway. | |
| match tcx.thir_abstract_const(uv.def) { | |
| Ok(Some(ct)) => { | |
| let ct = tcx.expand_abstract_consts(ct.instantiate(tcx, uv.args)); | |
| if let Err(e) = ct.error_reported() { | |
| return Err(EvaluateConstErr::EvaluationFailure(e)); | |
| } else if ct.has_non_region_infer() || ct.has_non_region_param() { | |
| // If the anon const *does* actually use generic parameters or inference variables from | |
| // the generic arguments provided for it, then we should *not* attempt to evaluate it. | |
| return Err(EvaluateConstErr::HasGenericsOrInfers); | |
| } else { | |
| let args = | |
| replace_param_and_infer_args_with_placeholder(tcx, uv.args); | |
| let typing_env = infcx | |
| .typing_env(tcx.erase_and_anonymize_regions(param_env)) | |
| .with_post_analysis_normalized(tcx); | |
| (args, typing_env) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| Err(_) | Ok(None) => { | |
| let args = GenericArgs::identity_for_item(tcx, uv.def); | |
| let typing_env = ty::TypingEnv::post_analysis(tcx, uv.def); | |
| (args, typing_env) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| let typing_env = infcx | |
| .typing_env(tcx.erase_and_anonymize_regions(param_env)) | |
| .with_post_analysis_normalized(tcx); | |
| (uv.args, typing_env) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| Some(ty::AnonConstKind::RepeatExprCount) => { | |
| if uv.has_non_region_infer() { | |
| // Diagnostics will sometimes replace the identity args of anon consts in | |
| // array repeat expr counts with inference variables so we have to handle this | |
| // even though it is not something we should ever actually encounter. | |
| // | |
| // Array repeat expr counts are allowed to syntactically use generic parameters | |
| // but must not actually depend on them in order to evalaute successfully. This means | |
| // that it is actually fine to evalaute them in their own environment rather than with | |
| // the actually provided generic arguments. | |
| tcx.dcx().delayed_bug("AnonConst with infer args but no error reported"); | |
| } | |
| // The generic args of repeat expr counts under `min_const_generics` are not supposed to | |
| // affect evaluation of the constant as this would make it a "truly" generic const arg. | |
| // To prevent this we discard all the generic arguments and evalaute with identity args | |
| // and in its own environment instead of the current environment we are normalizing in. | |
| let args = GenericArgs::identity_for_item(tcx, uv.def); | |
| let typing_env = ty::TypingEnv::post_analysis(tcx, uv.def); | |
| (args, typing_env) | |
| } | |
| Some(ty::AnonConstKind::OGCA) => { | |
| if infcx.typing_mode() != TypingMode::PostAnalysis { | |
| // OGCA anon consts should be treated as always having generics | |
| // during anything before codegen (or maybe MIR opts too). | |
| return Err(EvaluateConstErr::HasGenericsOrInfers); | |
| } | |
| if uv.args.has_non_region_param() || uv.args.has_non_region_infer() { | |
| return Err(EvaluateConstErr::HasGenericsOrInfers); | |
| } | |
| let typing_env = ty::TypingEnv::fully_monomorphized(); | |
| (uv.args, typing_env) | |
| } | |
| Some(ty::AnonConstKind::MCG) | Some(ty::AnonConstKind::NonTypeSystem) | None => { | |
| // We are only dealing with "truly" generic/uninferred constants here: | |
| // - GCEConsts have been handled separately | |
| // - Repeat expr count back compat consts have also been handled separately | |
| // So we are free to simply defer evaluation here. | |
| // | |
| // FIXME: This assumes that `args` are normalized which is not necessarily true | |
| // | |
| // Const patterns are converted to type system constants before being | |
| // evaluated. However, we don't care about them here as pattern evaluation | |
| // logic does not go through type system normalization. If it did this would | |
| // be a backwards compatibility problem as we do not enforce "syntactic" non- | |
| // usage of generic parameters like we do here. | |
| if uv.args.has_non_region_param() || uv.args.has_non_region_infer() { | |
| return Err(EvaluateConstErr::HasGenericsOrInfers); | |
| } | |
| // Since there is no generic parameter, we can just drop the environment | |
| // to prevent query cycle. | |
| let typing_env = ty::TypingEnv::fully_monomorphized(); | |
| (uv.args, typing_env) | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| let uv = ty::UnevaluatedConst::new(uv.def, args); | |
| let erased_uv = tcx.erase_and_anonymize_regions(uv); | |
| use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::ErrorHandled; | |
| // FIXME: `def_span` will point at the definition of this const; ideally, we'd point at | |
| // where it gets used as a const generic. | |
| match tcx.const_eval_resolve_for_typeck(typing_env, erased_uv, tcx.def_span(uv.def)) { | |
| Ok(Ok(val)) => Ok(ty::Const::new_value( | |
| tcx, | |
| val, | |
| tcx.type_of(uv.def).instantiate(tcx, uv.args), | |
| )), | |
| Ok(Err(_)) => { | |
| let e = tcx.dcx().delayed_bug( | |
| "Type system constant with non valtree'able type evaluated but no error emitted", | |
| ); | |
| Err(EvaluateConstErr::InvalidConstParamTy(e)) | |
| } | |
| Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(info, _)) => { | |
| Err(EvaluateConstErr::EvaluationFailure(info.into())) | |
| } | |
| Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(_)) => Err(EvaluateConstErr::HasGenericsOrInfers), | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Replaces args that reference param or infer variables with suitable | |
| /// placeholders. This function is meant to remove these param and infer | |
| /// args when they're not actually needed to evaluate a constant. | |
| fn replace_param_and_infer_args_with_placeholder<'tcx>( | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| args: GenericArgsRef<'tcx>, | |
| ) -> GenericArgsRef<'tcx> { | |
| struct ReplaceParamAndInferWithPlaceholder<'tcx> { | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| idx: ty::BoundVar, | |
| } | |
| impl<'tcx> TypeFolder<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ReplaceParamAndInferWithPlaceholder<'tcx> { | |
| fn cx(&self) -> TyCtxt<'tcx> { | |
| self.tcx | |
| } | |
| fn fold_ty(&mut self, t: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> { | |
| if let ty::Infer(_) = t.kind() { | |
| let idx = self.idx; | |
| self.idx += 1; | |
| Ty::new_placeholder( | |
| self.tcx, | |
| ty::PlaceholderType::new( | |
| ty::UniverseIndex::ROOT, | |
| ty::BoundTy { var: idx, kind: ty::BoundTyKind::Anon }, | |
| ), | |
| ) | |
| } else { | |
| t.super_fold_with(self) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| fn fold_const(&mut self, c: ty::Const<'tcx>) -> ty::Const<'tcx> { | |
| if let ty::ConstKind::Infer(_) = c.kind() { | |
| let idx = self.idx; | |
| self.idx += 1; | |
| ty::Const::new_placeholder( | |
| self.tcx, | |
| ty::PlaceholderConst::new(ty::UniverseIndex::ROOT, ty::BoundConst::new(idx)), | |
| ) | |
| } else { | |
| c.super_fold_with(self) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| args.fold_with(&mut ReplaceParamAndInferWithPlaceholder { tcx, idx: ty::BoundVar::ZERO }) | |
| } | |
| /// Normalizes the predicates and checks whether they hold in an empty environment. If this | |
| /// returns true, then either normalize encountered an error or one of the predicates did not | |
| /// hold. Used when creating vtables to check for unsatisfiable methods. This should not be | |
| /// used during analysis. | |
| pub fn impossible_predicates<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, predicates: Vec<ty::Clause<'tcx>>) -> bool { | |
| debug!("impossible_predicates(predicates={:?})", predicates); | |
| let (infcx, param_env) = tcx | |
| .infer_ctxt() | |
| .with_next_trait_solver(true) | |
| .build_with_typing_env(ty::TypingEnv::fully_monomorphized()); | |
| let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(&infcx); | |
| let predicates = ocx.normalize(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, predicates); | |
| for predicate in predicates { | |
| let obligation = Obligation::new(tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, predicate); | |
| ocx.register_obligation(obligation); | |
| } | |
| // Use `try_evaluate_obligations` to only return impossible for true errors, | |
| // and not ambiguities or overflows. Since the new trait solver forces | |
| // some currently undetected overlap between `dyn Trait: Trait` built-in | |
| // vs user-written impls to AMBIGUOUS, this may return ambiguity even | |
| // with no infer vars. There may also be ways to encounter ambiguity due | |
| // to post-mono overflow. | |
| let true_errors = ocx.try_evaluate_obligations(); | |
| if !true_errors.is_empty() { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| false | |
| } | |
| fn instantiate_and_check_impossible_predicates<'tcx>( | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| key: (DefId, GenericArgsRef<'tcx>), | |
| ) -> bool { | |
| debug!("instantiate_and_check_impossible_predicates(key={:?})", key); | |
| let mut predicates = tcx.predicates_of(key.0).instantiate(tcx, key.1).predicates; | |
| // Specifically check trait fulfillment to avoid an error when trying to resolve | |
| // associated items. | |
| if let Some(trait_def_id) = tcx.trait_of_assoc(key.0) { | |
| let trait_ref = ty::TraitRef::from_assoc(tcx, trait_def_id, key.1); | |
| predicates.push(trait_ref.upcast(tcx)); | |
| } | |
| predicates.retain(|predicate| !predicate.has_param()); | |
| let result = impossible_predicates(tcx, predicates); | |
| debug!("instantiate_and_check_impossible_predicates(key={:?}) = {:?}", key, result); | |
| result | |
| } | |
| /// Checks whether a trait's associated item is impossible to reference on a given impl. | |
| /// | |
| /// This only considers predicates that reference the impl's generics, and not | |
| /// those that reference the method's generics. | |
| fn is_impossible_associated_item( | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, | |
| (impl_def_id, trait_item_def_id): (DefId, DefId), | |
| ) -> bool { | |
| struct ReferencesOnlyParentGenerics<'tcx> { | |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | |
| generics: &'tcx ty::Generics, | |
| trait_item_def_id: DefId, | |
| } | |
| impl<'tcx> ty::TypeVisitor<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ReferencesOnlyParentGenerics<'tcx> { | |
| type Result = ControlFlow<()>; | |
| fn visit_ty(&mut self, t: Ty<'tcx>) -> Self::Result { | |
| // If this is a parameter from the trait item's own generics, then bail | |
| if let ty::Param(param) = *t.kind() | |
| && let param_def_id = self.generics.type_param(param, self.tcx).def_id | |
| && self.tcx.parent(param_def_id) == self.trait_item_def_id | |
| { | |
| return ControlFlow::Break(()); | |
| } | |
| t.super_visit_with(self) | |
| } | |
| fn visit_region(&mut self, r: ty::Region<'tcx>) -> Self::Result { | |
| if let ty::ReEarlyParam(param) = r.kind() | |
| && let param_def_id = self.generics.region_param(param, self.tcx).def_id | |
| && self.tcx.parent(param_def_id) == self.trait_item_def_id | |
| { | |
| return ControlFlow::Break(()); | |
| } | |
| ControlFlow::Continue(()) | |
| } | |
| fn visit_const(&mut self, ct: ty::Const<'tcx>) -> Self::Result { | |
| if let ty::ConstKind::Param(param) = ct.kind() | |
| && let param_def_id = self.generics.const_param(param, self.tcx).def_id | |
| && self.tcx.parent(param_def_id) == self.trait_item_def_id | |
| { | |
| return ControlFlow::Break(()); | |
| } | |
| ct.super_visit_with(self) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| let generics = tcx.generics_of(trait_item_def_id); | |
| let predicates = tcx.predicates_of(trait_item_def_id); | |
| // Be conservative in cases where we have `W<T: ?Sized>` and a method like `Self: Sized`, | |
| // since that method *may* have some substitutions where the predicates hold. | |
| // | |
| // This replicates the logic we use in coherence. | |
| let infcx = tcx | |
| .infer_ctxt() | |
| .ignoring_regions() | |
| .with_next_trait_solver(true) | |
| .build(TypingMode::Coherence); | |
| let param_env = ty::ParamEnv::empty(); | |
| let fresh_args = infcx.fresh_args_for_item(tcx.def_span(impl_def_id), impl_def_id); | |
| let impl_trait_ref = tcx.impl_trait_ref(impl_def_id).instantiate(tcx, fresh_args); | |
| let mut visitor = ReferencesOnlyParentGenerics { tcx, generics, trait_item_def_id }; | |
| let predicates_for_trait = predicates.predicates.iter().filter_map(|(pred, span)| { | |
| pred.visit_with(&mut visitor).is_continue().then(|| { | |
| Obligation::new( | |
| tcx, | |
| ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(*span), | |
| param_env, | |
| ty::EarlyBinder::bind(*pred).instantiate(tcx, impl_trait_ref.args), | |
| ) | |
| }) | |
| }); | |
| let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(&infcx); | |
| ocx.register_obligations(predicates_for_trait); | |
| !ocx.try_evaluate_obligations().is_empty() | |
| } | |
| pub fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) { | |
| dyn_compatibility::provide(providers); | |
| vtable::provide(providers); | |
| *providers = Providers { | |
| specialization_graph_of: specialize::specialization_graph_provider, | |
| specializes: specialize::specializes, | |
| specialization_enabled_in: specialize::specialization_enabled_in, | |
| instantiate_and_check_impossible_predicates, | |
| is_impossible_associated_item, | |
| ..*providers | |
| }; | |
| } |