| use std::collections::VecDeque; |
| use std::rc::Rc; |
| |
| use rustc_data_structures::frozen::Frozen; |
| use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxIndexMap, FxIndexSet}; |
| use rustc_data_structures::graph::scc::Sccs; |
| use rustc_errors::Diag; |
| use rustc_hir::def_id::CRATE_DEF_ID; |
| use rustc_index::IndexVec; |
| use rustc_infer::infer::outlives::test_type_match; |
| use rustc_infer::infer::region_constraints::{GenericKind, VerifyBound, VerifyIfEq}; |
| use rustc_infer::infer::{InferCtxt, NllRegionVariableOrigin}; |
| use rustc_middle::bug; |
| use rustc_middle::mir::{ |
| AnnotationSource, BasicBlock, Body, ConstraintCategory, Local, Location, ReturnConstraint, |
| TerminatorKind, |
| }; |
| use rustc_middle::traits::{ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode}; |
| use rustc_middle::ty::{self, RegionVid, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, UniverseIndex, fold_regions}; |
| use rustc_mir_dataflow::points::DenseLocationMap; |
| use rustc_span::hygiene::DesugaringKind; |
| use rustc_span::{DUMMY_SP, Span}; |
| use tracing::{Level, debug, enabled, instrument, trace}; |
| |
| use crate::constraints::graph::NormalConstraintGraph; |
| use crate::constraints::{ConstraintSccIndex, OutlivesConstraint, OutlivesConstraintSet}; |
| use crate::dataflow::BorrowIndex; |
| use crate::diagnostics::{RegionErrorKind, RegionErrors, UniverseInfo}; |
| use crate::handle_placeholders::{LoweredConstraints, RegionTracker}; |
| use crate::polonius::LiveLoans; |
| use crate::polonius::legacy::PoloniusOutput; |
| use crate::region_infer::values::{LivenessValues, RegionElement, RegionValues, ToElementIndex}; |
| use crate::type_check::Locations; |
| use crate::type_check::free_region_relations::UniversalRegionRelations; |
| use crate::universal_regions::UniversalRegions; |
| use crate::{ |
| BorrowckInferCtxt, ClosureOutlivesRequirement, ClosureOutlivesSubject, |
| ClosureOutlivesSubjectTy, ClosureRegionRequirements, |
| }; |
| |
| mod dump_mir; |
| mod graphviz; |
| pub(crate) mod opaque_types; |
| mod reverse_sccs; |
| |
| pub(crate) mod values; |
| |
| /// The representative region variable for an SCC, tagged by its origin. |
| /// We prefer placeholders over existentially quantified variables, otherwise |
| /// it's the one with the smallest Region Variable ID. In other words, |
| /// the order of this enumeration really matters! |
| #[derive(Copy, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord)] |
| pub(crate) enum Representative { |
| FreeRegion(RegionVid), |
| Placeholder(RegionVid), |
| Existential(RegionVid), |
| } |
| |
| impl Representative { |
| pub(crate) fn rvid(self) -> RegionVid { |
| match self { |
| Representative::FreeRegion(region_vid) |
| | Representative::Placeholder(region_vid) |
| | Representative::Existential(region_vid) => region_vid, |
| } |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) fn new(r: RegionVid, definition: &RegionDefinition<'_>) -> Self { |
| match definition.origin { |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion => Representative::FreeRegion(r), |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(_) => Representative::Placeholder(r), |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Existential { .. } => Representative::Existential(r), |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) type ConstraintSccs = Sccs<RegionVid, ConstraintSccIndex>; |
| |
| pub struct RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> { |
| /// Contains the definition for every region variable. Region |
| /// variables are identified by their index (`RegionVid`). The |
| /// definition contains information about where the region came |
| /// from as well as its final inferred value. |
| pub(crate) definitions: Frozen<IndexVec<RegionVid, RegionDefinition<'tcx>>>, |
| |
| /// The liveness constraints added to each region. For most |
| /// regions, these start out empty and steadily grow, though for |
| /// each universally quantified region R they start out containing |
| /// the entire CFG and `end(R)`. |
| liveness_constraints: LivenessValues, |
| |
| /// The outlives constraints computed by the type-check. |
| constraints: Frozen<OutlivesConstraintSet<'tcx>>, |
| |
| /// The constraint-set, but in graph form, making it easy to traverse |
| /// the constraints adjacent to a particular region. Used to construct |
| /// the SCC (see `constraint_sccs`) and for error reporting. |
| constraint_graph: Frozen<NormalConstraintGraph>, |
| |
| /// The SCC computed from `constraints` and the constraint |
| /// graph. We have an edge from SCC A to SCC B if `A: B`. Used to |
| /// compute the values of each region. |
| constraint_sccs: ConstraintSccs, |
| |
| scc_annotations: IndexVec<ConstraintSccIndex, RegionTracker>, |
| |
| /// Map universe indexes to information on why we created it. |
| universe_causes: FxIndexMap<ty::UniverseIndex, UniverseInfo<'tcx>>, |
| |
| /// The final inferred values of the region variables; we compute |
| /// one value per SCC. To get the value for any given *region*, |
| /// you first find which scc it is a part of. |
| scc_values: RegionValues<ConstraintSccIndex>, |
| |
| /// Type constraints that we check after solving. |
| type_tests: Vec<TypeTest<'tcx>>, |
| |
| /// Information about how the universally quantified regions in |
| /// scope on this function relate to one another. |
| universal_region_relations: Frozen<UniversalRegionRelations<'tcx>>, |
| } |
| |
| #[derive(Debug)] |
| pub(crate) struct RegionDefinition<'tcx> { |
| /// What kind of variable is this -- a free region? existential |
| /// variable? etc. (See the `NllRegionVariableOrigin` for more |
| /// info.) |
| pub(crate) origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin, |
| |
| /// Which universe is this region variable defined in? This is |
| /// most often `ty::UniverseIndex::ROOT`, but when we encounter |
| /// forall-quantifiers like `for<'a> { 'a = 'b }`, we would create |
| /// the variable for `'a` in a fresh universe that extends ROOT. |
| pub(crate) universe: ty::UniverseIndex, |
| |
| /// If this is 'static or an early-bound region, then this is |
| /// `Some(X)` where `X` is the name of the region. |
| pub(crate) external_name: Option<ty::Region<'tcx>>, |
| } |
| |
| /// N.B., the variants in `Cause` are intentionally ordered. Lower |
| /// values are preferred when it comes to error messages. Do not |
| /// reorder willy nilly. |
| #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialOrd, Ord, PartialEq, Eq)] |
| pub(crate) enum Cause { |
| /// point inserted because Local was live at the given Location |
| LiveVar(Local, Location), |
| |
| /// point inserted because Local was dropped at the given Location |
| DropVar(Local, Location), |
| } |
| |
| /// A "type test" corresponds to an outlives constraint between a type |
| /// and a lifetime, like `T: 'x` or `<T as Foo>::Bar: 'x`. They are |
| /// translated from the `Verify` region constraints in the ordinary |
| /// inference context. |
| /// |
| /// These sorts of constraints are handled differently than ordinary |
| /// constraints, at least at present. During type checking, the |
| /// `InferCtxt::process_registered_region_obligations` method will |
| /// attempt to convert a type test like `T: 'x` into an ordinary |
| /// outlives constraint when possible (for example, `&'a T: 'b` will |
| /// be converted into `'a: 'b` and registered as a `Constraint`). |
| /// |
| /// In some cases, however, there are outlives relationships that are |
| /// not converted into a region constraint, but rather into one of |
| /// these "type tests". The distinction is that a type test does not |
| /// influence the inference result, but instead just examines the |
| /// values that we ultimately inferred for each region variable and |
| /// checks that they meet certain extra criteria. If not, an error |
| /// can be issued. |
| /// |
| /// One reason for this is that these type tests typically boil down |
| /// to a check like `'a: 'x` where `'a` is a universally quantified |
| /// region -- and therefore not one whose value is really meant to be |
| /// *inferred*, precisely (this is not always the case: one can have a |
| /// type test like `<Foo as Trait<'?0>>::Bar: 'x`, where `'?0` is an |
| /// inference variable). Another reason is that these type tests can |
| /// involve *disjunction* -- that is, they can be satisfied in more |
| /// than one way. |
| /// |
| /// For more information about this translation, see |
| /// `InferCtxt::process_registered_region_obligations` and |
| /// `InferCtxt::type_must_outlive` in `rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt`. |
| #[derive(Clone, Debug)] |
| pub(crate) struct TypeTest<'tcx> { |
| /// The type `T` that must outlive the region. |
| pub generic_kind: GenericKind<'tcx>, |
| |
| /// The region `'x` that the type must outlive. |
| pub lower_bound: RegionVid, |
| |
| /// The span to blame. |
| pub span: Span, |
| |
| /// A test which, if met by the region `'x`, proves that this type |
| /// constraint is satisfied. |
| pub verify_bound: VerifyBound<'tcx>, |
| } |
| |
| /// When we have an unmet lifetime constraint, we try to propagate it outward (e.g. to a closure |
| /// environment). If we can't, it is an error. |
| #[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)] |
| enum RegionRelationCheckResult { |
| Ok, |
| Propagated, |
| Error, |
| } |
| |
| #[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)] |
| enum Trace<'a, 'tcx> { |
| StartRegion, |
| FromGraph(&'a OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>), |
| FromStatic(RegionVid), |
| NotVisited, |
| } |
| |
| #[instrument(skip(infcx, sccs), level = "debug")] |
| fn sccs_info<'tcx>(infcx: &BorrowckInferCtxt<'tcx>, sccs: &ConstraintSccs) { |
| use crate::renumber::RegionCtxt; |
| |
| let var_to_origin = infcx.reg_var_to_origin.borrow(); |
| |
| let mut var_to_origin_sorted = var_to_origin.clone().into_iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(); |
| var_to_origin_sorted.sort_by_key(|vto| vto.0); |
| |
| if enabled!(Level::DEBUG) { |
| let mut reg_vars_to_origins_str = "region variables to origins:\n".to_string(); |
| for (reg_var, origin) in var_to_origin_sorted.into_iter() { |
| reg_vars_to_origins_str.push_str(&format!("{reg_var:?}: {origin:?}\n")); |
| } |
| debug!("{}", reg_vars_to_origins_str); |
| } |
| |
| let num_components = sccs.num_sccs(); |
| let mut components = vec![FxIndexSet::default(); num_components]; |
| |
| for (reg_var, scc_idx) in sccs.scc_indices().iter_enumerated() { |
| let origin = var_to_origin.get(®_var).unwrap_or(&RegionCtxt::Unknown); |
| components[scc_idx.as_usize()].insert((reg_var, *origin)); |
| } |
| |
| if enabled!(Level::DEBUG) { |
| let mut components_str = "strongly connected components:".to_string(); |
| for (scc_idx, reg_vars_origins) in components.iter().enumerate() { |
| let regions_info = reg_vars_origins.clone().into_iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(); |
| components_str.push_str(&format!( |
| "{:?}: {:?},\n)", |
| ConstraintSccIndex::from_usize(scc_idx), |
| regions_info, |
| )) |
| } |
| debug!("{}", components_str); |
| } |
| |
| // calculate the best representative for each component |
| let components_representatives = components |
| .into_iter() |
| .enumerate() |
| .map(|(scc_idx, region_ctxts)| { |
| let repr = region_ctxts |
| .into_iter() |
| .map(|reg_var_origin| reg_var_origin.1) |
| .max_by(|x, y| x.preference_value().cmp(&y.preference_value())) |
| .unwrap(); |
| |
| (ConstraintSccIndex::from_usize(scc_idx), repr) |
| }) |
| .collect::<FxIndexMap<_, _>>(); |
| |
| let mut scc_node_to_edges = FxIndexMap::default(); |
| for (scc_idx, repr) in components_representatives.iter() { |
| let edge_representatives = sccs |
| .successors(*scc_idx) |
| .iter() |
| .map(|scc_idx| components_representatives[scc_idx]) |
| .collect::<Vec<_>>(); |
| scc_node_to_edges.insert((scc_idx, repr), edge_representatives); |
| } |
| |
| debug!("SCC edges {:#?}", scc_node_to_edges); |
| } |
| |
| impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> { |
| /// Creates a new region inference context with a total of |
| /// `num_region_variables` valid inference variables; the first N |
| /// of those will be constant regions representing the free |
| /// regions defined in `universal_regions`. |
| /// |
| /// The `outlives_constraints` and `type_tests` are an initial set |
| /// of constraints produced by the MIR type check. |
| pub(crate) fn new( |
| infcx: &BorrowckInferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| lowered_constraints: LoweredConstraints<'tcx>, |
| universal_region_relations: Frozen<UniversalRegionRelations<'tcx>>, |
| location_map: Rc<DenseLocationMap>, |
| ) -> Self { |
| let universal_regions = &universal_region_relations.universal_regions; |
| |
| let LoweredConstraints { |
| constraint_sccs, |
| definitions, |
| outlives_constraints, |
| scc_annotations, |
| type_tests, |
| liveness_constraints, |
| universe_causes, |
| placeholder_indices, |
| } = lowered_constraints; |
| |
| debug!("universal_regions: {:#?}", universal_region_relations.universal_regions); |
| debug!("outlives constraints: {:#?}", outlives_constraints); |
| debug!("placeholder_indices: {:#?}", placeholder_indices); |
| debug!("type tests: {:#?}", type_tests); |
| |
| let constraint_graph = Frozen::freeze(outlives_constraints.graph(definitions.len())); |
| |
| if cfg!(debug_assertions) { |
| sccs_info(infcx, &constraint_sccs); |
| } |
| |
| let mut scc_values = |
| RegionValues::new(location_map, universal_regions.len(), placeholder_indices); |
| |
| for region in liveness_constraints.regions() { |
| let scc = constraint_sccs.scc(region); |
| scc_values.merge_liveness(scc, region, &liveness_constraints); |
| } |
| |
| let mut result = Self { |
| definitions, |
| liveness_constraints, |
| constraints: outlives_constraints, |
| constraint_graph, |
| constraint_sccs, |
| scc_annotations, |
| universe_causes, |
| scc_values, |
| type_tests, |
| universal_region_relations, |
| }; |
| |
| result.init_free_and_bound_regions(); |
| |
| result |
| } |
| |
| /// Initializes the region variables for each universally |
| /// quantified region (lifetime parameter). The first N variables |
| /// always correspond to the regions appearing in the function |
| /// signature (both named and anonymous) and where-clauses. This |
| /// function iterates over those regions and initializes them with |
| /// minimum values. |
| /// |
| /// For example: |
| /// ```ignore (illustrative) |
| /// fn foo<'a, 'b>( /* ... */ ) where 'a: 'b { /* ... */ } |
| /// ``` |
| /// would initialize two variables like so: |
| /// ```ignore (illustrative) |
| /// R0 = { CFG, R0 } // 'a |
| /// R1 = { CFG, R0, R1 } // 'b |
| /// ``` |
| /// Here, R0 represents `'a`, and it contains (a) the entire CFG |
| /// and (b) any universally quantified regions that it outlives, |
| /// which in this case is just itself. R1 (`'b`) in contrast also |
| /// outlives `'a` and hence contains R0 and R1. |
| /// |
| /// This bit of logic also handles invalid universe relations |
| /// for higher-kinded types. |
| /// |
| /// We Walk each SCC `A` and `B` such that `A: B` |
| /// and ensure that universe(A) can see universe(B). |
| /// |
| /// This serves to enforce the 'empty/placeholder' hierarchy |
| /// (described in more detail on `RegionKind`): |
| /// |
| /// ```ignore (illustrative) |
| /// static -----+ |
| /// | | |
| /// empty(U0) placeholder(U1) |
| /// | / |
| /// empty(U1) |
| /// ``` |
| /// |
| /// In particular, imagine we have variables R0 in U0 and R1 |
| /// created in U1, and constraints like this; |
| /// |
| /// ```ignore (illustrative) |
| /// R1: !1 // R1 outlives the placeholder in U1 |
| /// R1: R0 // R1 outlives R0 |
| /// ``` |
| /// |
| /// Here, we wish for R1 to be `'static`, because it |
| /// cannot outlive `placeholder(U1)` and `empty(U0)` any other way. |
| /// |
| /// Thanks to this loop, what happens is that the `R1: R0` |
| /// constraint has lowered the universe of `R1` to `U0`, which in turn |
| /// means that the `R1: !1` constraint here will cause |
| /// `R1` to become `'static`. |
| fn init_free_and_bound_regions(&mut self) { |
| for variable in self.definitions.indices() { |
| let scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(variable); |
| |
| match self.definitions[variable].origin { |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion => { |
| // For each free, universally quantified region X: |
| |
| // Add all nodes in the CFG to liveness constraints |
| self.liveness_constraints.add_all_points(variable); |
| self.scc_values.add_all_points(scc); |
| |
| // Add `end(X)` into the set for X. |
| self.scc_values.add_element(scc, variable); |
| } |
| |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(placeholder) => { |
| self.scc_values.add_element(scc, placeholder); |
| } |
| |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Existential { .. } => { |
| // For existential, regions, nothing to do. |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns an iterator over all the region indices. |
| pub(crate) fn regions(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = RegionVid> + 'tcx { |
| self.definitions.indices() |
| } |
| |
| /// Given a universal region in scope on the MIR, returns the |
| /// corresponding index. |
| /// |
| /// Panics if `r` is not a registered universal region, most notably |
| /// if it is a placeholder. Handling placeholders requires access to the |
| /// `MirTypeckRegionConstraints`. |
| pub(crate) fn to_region_vid(&self, r: ty::Region<'tcx>) -> RegionVid { |
| self.universal_regions().to_region_vid(r) |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns an iterator over all the outlives constraints. |
| pub(crate) fn outlives_constraints(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>> { |
| self.constraints.outlives().iter().copied() |
| } |
| |
| /// Adds annotations for `#[rustc_regions]`; see `UniversalRegions::annotate`. |
| pub(crate) fn annotate(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, err: &mut Diag<'_, ()>) { |
| self.universal_regions().annotate(tcx, err) |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns `true` if the region `r` contains the point `p`. |
| /// |
| /// Panics if called before `solve()` executes, |
| pub(crate) fn region_contains(&self, r: RegionVid, p: impl ToElementIndex) -> bool { |
| let scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r); |
| self.scc_values.contains(scc, p) |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns the lowest statement index in `start..=end` which is not contained by `r`. |
| /// |
| /// Panics if called before `solve()` executes. |
| pub(crate) fn first_non_contained_inclusive( |
| &self, |
| r: RegionVid, |
| block: BasicBlock, |
| start: usize, |
| end: usize, |
| ) -> Option<usize> { |
| let scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r); |
| self.scc_values.first_non_contained_inclusive(scc, block, start, end) |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns access to the value of `r` for debugging purposes. |
| pub(crate) fn region_value_str(&self, r: RegionVid) -> String { |
| let scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r); |
| self.scc_values.region_value_str(scc) |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) fn placeholders_contained_in( |
| &self, |
| r: RegionVid, |
| ) -> impl Iterator<Item = ty::PlaceholderRegion> { |
| let scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r); |
| self.scc_values.placeholders_contained_in(scc) |
| } |
| |
| /// Performs region inference and report errors if we see any |
| /// unsatisfiable constraints. If this is a closure, returns the |
| /// region requirements to propagate to our creator, if any. |
| #[instrument(skip(self, infcx, body, polonius_output), level = "debug")] |
| pub(super) fn solve( |
| &mut self, |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| body: &Body<'tcx>, |
| polonius_output: Option<Box<PoloniusOutput>>, |
| ) -> (Option<ClosureRegionRequirements<'tcx>>, RegionErrors<'tcx>) { |
| let mir_def_id = body.source.def_id(); |
| self.propagate_constraints(); |
| |
| let mut errors_buffer = RegionErrors::new(infcx.tcx); |
| |
| // If this is a closure, we can propagate unsatisfied |
| // `outlives_requirements` to our creator, so create a vector |
| // to store those. Otherwise, we'll pass in `None` to the |
| // functions below, which will trigger them to report errors |
| // eagerly. |
| let mut outlives_requirements = infcx.tcx.is_typeck_child(mir_def_id).then(Vec::new); |
| |
| self.check_type_tests(infcx, outlives_requirements.as_mut(), &mut errors_buffer); |
| |
| debug!(?errors_buffer); |
| debug!(?outlives_requirements); |
| |
| // In Polonius mode, the errors about missing universal region relations are in the output |
| // and need to be emitted or propagated. Otherwise, we need to check whether the |
| // constraints were too strong, and if so, emit or propagate those errors. |
| if infcx.tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.polonius.is_legacy_enabled() { |
| self.check_polonius_subset_errors( |
| outlives_requirements.as_mut(), |
| &mut errors_buffer, |
| polonius_output |
| .as_ref() |
| .expect("Polonius output is unavailable despite `-Z polonius`"), |
| ); |
| } else { |
| self.check_universal_regions(outlives_requirements.as_mut(), &mut errors_buffer); |
| } |
| |
| debug!(?errors_buffer); |
| |
| let outlives_requirements = outlives_requirements.unwrap_or_default(); |
| |
| if outlives_requirements.is_empty() { |
| (None, errors_buffer) |
| } else { |
| let num_external_vids = self.universal_regions().num_global_and_external_regions(); |
| ( |
| Some(ClosureRegionRequirements { num_external_vids, outlives_requirements }), |
| errors_buffer, |
| ) |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Propagate the region constraints: this will grow the values |
| /// for each region variable until all the constraints are |
| /// satisfied. Note that some values may grow **too** large to be |
| /// feasible, but we check this later. |
| #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")] |
| fn propagate_constraints(&mut self) { |
| debug!("constraints={:#?}", { |
| let mut constraints: Vec<_> = self.outlives_constraints().collect(); |
| constraints.sort_by_key(|c| (c.sup, c.sub)); |
| constraints |
| .into_iter() |
| .map(|c| (c, self.constraint_sccs.scc(c.sup), self.constraint_sccs.scc(c.sub))) |
| .collect::<Vec<_>>() |
| }); |
| |
| // To propagate constraints, we walk the DAG induced by the |
| // SCC. For each SCC `A`, we visit its successors and compute |
| // their values, then we union all those values to get our |
| // own. |
| for scc_a in self.constraint_sccs.all_sccs() { |
| // Walk each SCC `B` such that `A: B`... |
| for &scc_b in self.constraint_sccs.successors(scc_a) { |
| debug!(?scc_b); |
| self.scc_values.add_region(scc_a, scc_b); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns `true` if all the placeholders in the value of `scc_b` are nameable |
| /// in `scc_a`. Used during constraint propagation, and only once |
| /// the value of `scc_b` has been computed. |
| fn can_name_all_placeholders( |
| &self, |
| scc_a: ConstraintSccIndex, |
| scc_b: ConstraintSccIndex, |
| ) -> bool { |
| self.scc_annotations[scc_a].can_name_all_placeholders(self.scc_annotations[scc_b]) |
| } |
| |
| /// Once regions have been propagated, this method is used to see |
| /// whether the "type tests" produced by typeck were satisfied; |
| /// type tests encode type-outlives relationships like `T: |
| /// 'a`. See `TypeTest` for more details. |
| fn check_type_tests( |
| &self, |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| mut propagated_outlives_requirements: Option<&mut Vec<ClosureOutlivesRequirement<'tcx>>>, |
| errors_buffer: &mut RegionErrors<'tcx>, |
| ) { |
| let tcx = infcx.tcx; |
| |
| // Sometimes we register equivalent type-tests that would |
| // result in basically the exact same error being reported to |
| // the user. Avoid that. |
| let mut deduplicate_errors = FxIndexSet::default(); |
| |
| for type_test in &self.type_tests { |
| debug!("check_type_test: {:?}", type_test); |
| |
| let generic_ty = type_test.generic_kind.to_ty(tcx); |
| if self.eval_verify_bound( |
| infcx, |
| generic_ty, |
| type_test.lower_bound, |
| &type_test.verify_bound, |
| ) { |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| if let Some(propagated_outlives_requirements) = &mut propagated_outlives_requirements |
| && self.try_promote_type_test(infcx, type_test, propagated_outlives_requirements) |
| { |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| // Type-test failed. Report the error. |
| let erased_generic_kind = infcx.tcx.erase_and_anonymize_regions(type_test.generic_kind); |
| |
| // Skip duplicate-ish errors. |
| if deduplicate_errors.insert(( |
| erased_generic_kind, |
| type_test.lower_bound, |
| type_test.span, |
| )) { |
| debug!( |
| "check_type_test: reporting error for erased_generic_kind={:?}, \ |
| lower_bound_region={:?}, \ |
| type_test.span={:?}", |
| erased_generic_kind, type_test.lower_bound, type_test.span, |
| ); |
| |
| errors_buffer.push(RegionErrorKind::TypeTestError { type_test: type_test.clone() }); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Invoked when we have some type-test (e.g., `T: 'X`) that we cannot |
| /// prove to be satisfied. If this is a closure, we will attempt to |
| /// "promote" this type-test into our `ClosureRegionRequirements` and |
| /// hence pass it up the creator. To do this, we have to phrase the |
| /// type-test in terms of external free regions, as local free |
| /// regions are not nameable by the closure's creator. |
| /// |
| /// Promotion works as follows: we first check that the type `T` |
| /// contains only regions that the creator knows about. If this is |
| /// true, then -- as a consequence -- we know that all regions in |
| /// the type `T` are free regions that outlive the closure body. If |
| /// false, then promotion fails. |
| /// |
| /// Once we've promoted T, we have to "promote" `'X` to some region |
| /// that is "external" to the closure. Generally speaking, a region |
| /// may be the union of some points in the closure body as well as |
| /// various free lifetimes. We can ignore the points in the closure |
| /// body: if the type T can be expressed in terms of external regions, |
| /// we know it outlives the points in the closure body. That |
| /// just leaves the free regions. |
| /// |
| /// The idea then is to lower the `T: 'X` constraint into multiple |
| /// bounds -- e.g., if `'X` is the union of two free lifetimes, |
| /// `'1` and `'2`, then we would create `T: '1` and `T: '2`. |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, infcx, propagated_outlives_requirements))] |
| fn try_promote_type_test( |
| &self, |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| type_test: &TypeTest<'tcx>, |
| propagated_outlives_requirements: &mut Vec<ClosureOutlivesRequirement<'tcx>>, |
| ) -> bool { |
| let tcx = infcx.tcx; |
| let TypeTest { generic_kind, lower_bound, span: blame_span, verify_bound: _ } = *type_test; |
| |
| let generic_ty = generic_kind.to_ty(tcx); |
| let Some(subject) = self.try_promote_type_test_subject(infcx, generic_ty) else { |
| return false; |
| }; |
| |
| let r_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(lower_bound); |
| debug!( |
| "lower_bound = {:?} r_scc={:?} universe={:?}", |
| lower_bound, |
| r_scc, |
| self.max_nameable_universe(r_scc) |
| ); |
| // If the type test requires that `T: 'a` where `'a` is a |
| // placeholder from another universe, that effectively requires |
| // `T: 'static`, so we have to propagate that requirement. |
| // |
| // It doesn't matter *what* universe because the promoted `T` will |
| // always be in the root universe. |
| if let Some(p) = self.scc_values.placeholders_contained_in(r_scc).next() { |
| debug!("encountered placeholder in higher universe: {:?}, requiring 'static", p); |
| let static_r = self.universal_regions().fr_static; |
| propagated_outlives_requirements.push(ClosureOutlivesRequirement { |
| subject, |
| outlived_free_region: static_r, |
| blame_span, |
| category: ConstraintCategory::Boring, |
| }); |
| |
| // we can return here -- the code below might push add'l constraints |
| // but they would all be weaker than this one. |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // For each region outlived by lower_bound find a non-local, |
| // universal region (it may be the same region) and add it to |
| // `ClosureOutlivesRequirement`. |
| let mut found_outlived_universal_region = false; |
| for ur in self.scc_values.universal_regions_outlived_by(r_scc) { |
| found_outlived_universal_region = true; |
| debug!("universal_region_outlived_by ur={:?}", ur); |
| let non_local_ub = self.universal_region_relations.non_local_upper_bounds(ur); |
| debug!(?non_local_ub); |
| |
| // This is slightly too conservative. To show T: '1, given `'2: '1` |
| // and `'3: '1` we only need to prove that T: '2 *or* T: '3, but to |
| // avoid potential non-determinism we approximate this by requiring |
| // T: '1 and T: '2. |
| for upper_bound in non_local_ub { |
| debug_assert!(self.universal_regions().is_universal_region(upper_bound)); |
| debug_assert!(!self.universal_regions().is_local_free_region(upper_bound)); |
| |
| let requirement = ClosureOutlivesRequirement { |
| subject, |
| outlived_free_region: upper_bound, |
| blame_span, |
| category: ConstraintCategory::Boring, |
| }; |
| debug!(?requirement, "adding closure requirement"); |
| propagated_outlives_requirements.push(requirement); |
| } |
| } |
| // If we succeed to promote the subject, i.e. it only contains non-local regions, |
| // and fail to prove the type test inside of the closure, the `lower_bound` has to |
| // also be at least as large as some universal region, as the type test is otherwise |
| // trivial. |
| assert!(found_outlived_universal_region); |
| true |
| } |
| |
| /// When we promote a type test `T: 'r`, we have to replace all region |
| /// variables in the type `T` with an equal universal region from the |
| /// closure signature. |
| /// This is not always possible, so this is a fallible process. |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, infcx), ret)] |
| fn try_promote_type_test_subject( |
| &self, |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| ty: Ty<'tcx>, |
| ) -> Option<ClosureOutlivesSubject<'tcx>> { |
| let tcx = infcx.tcx; |
| let mut failed = false; |
| let ty = fold_regions(tcx, ty, |r, _depth| { |
| let r_vid = self.to_region_vid(r); |
| let r_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r_vid); |
| |
| // The challenge is this. We have some region variable `r` |
| // whose value is a set of CFG points and universal |
| // regions. We want to find if that set is *equivalent* to |
| // any of the named regions found in the closure. |
| // To do so, we simply check every candidate `u_r` for equality. |
| self.scc_values |
| .universal_regions_outlived_by(r_scc) |
| .filter(|&u_r| !self.universal_regions().is_local_free_region(u_r)) |
| .find(|&u_r| self.eval_equal(u_r, r_vid)) |
| .map(|u_r| ty::Region::new_var(tcx, u_r)) |
| // In case we could not find a named region to map to, |
| // we will return `None` below. |
| .unwrap_or_else(|| { |
| failed = true; |
| r |
| }) |
| }); |
| |
| debug!("try_promote_type_test_subject: folded ty = {:?}", ty); |
| |
| // This will be true if we failed to promote some region. |
| if failed { |
| return None; |
| } |
| |
| Some(ClosureOutlivesSubject::Ty(ClosureOutlivesSubjectTy::bind(tcx, ty))) |
| } |
| |
| /// Like `universal_upper_bound`, but returns an approximation more suitable |
| /// for diagnostics. If `r` contains multiple disjoint universal regions |
| /// (e.g. 'a and 'b in `fn foo<'a, 'b> { ... }`, we pick the lower-numbered region. |
| /// This corresponds to picking named regions over unnamed regions |
| /// (e.g. picking early-bound regions over a closure late-bound region). |
| /// |
| /// This means that the returned value may not be a true upper bound, since |
| /// only 'static is known to outlive disjoint universal regions. |
| /// Therefore, this method should only be used in diagnostic code, |
| /// where displaying *some* named universal region is better than |
| /// falling back to 'static. |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))] |
| pub(crate) fn approx_universal_upper_bound(&self, r: RegionVid) -> RegionVid { |
| debug!("{}", self.region_value_str(r)); |
| |
| // Find the smallest universal region that contains all other |
| // universal regions within `region`. |
| let mut lub = self.universal_regions().fr_fn_body; |
| let r_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r); |
| let static_r = self.universal_regions().fr_static; |
| for ur in self.scc_values.universal_regions_outlived_by(r_scc) { |
| let new_lub = self.universal_region_relations.postdom_upper_bound(lub, ur); |
| debug!(?ur, ?lub, ?new_lub); |
| // The upper bound of two non-static regions is static: this |
| // means we know nothing about the relationship between these |
| // two regions. Pick a 'better' one to use when constructing |
| // a diagnostic |
| if ur != static_r && lub != static_r && new_lub == static_r { |
| // Prefer the region with an `external_name` - this |
| // indicates that the region is early-bound, so working with |
| // it can produce a nicer error. |
| if self.region_definition(ur).external_name.is_some() { |
| lub = ur; |
| } else if self.region_definition(lub).external_name.is_some() { |
| // Leave lub unchanged |
| } else { |
| // If we get here, we don't have any reason to prefer |
| // one region over the other. Just pick the |
| // one with the lower index for now. |
| lub = std::cmp::min(ur, lub); |
| } |
| } else { |
| lub = new_lub; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| debug!(?r, ?lub); |
| |
| lub |
| } |
| |
| /// Tests if `test` is true when applied to `lower_bound` at |
| /// `point`. |
| fn eval_verify_bound( |
| &self, |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| generic_ty: Ty<'tcx>, |
| lower_bound: RegionVid, |
| verify_bound: &VerifyBound<'tcx>, |
| ) -> bool { |
| debug!("eval_verify_bound(lower_bound={:?}, verify_bound={:?})", lower_bound, verify_bound); |
| |
| match verify_bound { |
| VerifyBound::IfEq(verify_if_eq_b) => { |
| self.eval_if_eq(infcx, generic_ty, lower_bound, *verify_if_eq_b) |
| } |
| |
| VerifyBound::IsEmpty => { |
| let lower_bound_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(lower_bound); |
| self.scc_values.elements_contained_in(lower_bound_scc).next().is_none() |
| } |
| |
| VerifyBound::OutlivedBy(r) => { |
| let r_vid = self.to_region_vid(*r); |
| self.eval_outlives(r_vid, lower_bound) |
| } |
| |
| VerifyBound::AnyBound(verify_bounds) => verify_bounds.iter().any(|verify_bound| { |
| self.eval_verify_bound(infcx, generic_ty, lower_bound, verify_bound) |
| }), |
| |
| VerifyBound::AllBounds(verify_bounds) => verify_bounds.iter().all(|verify_bound| { |
| self.eval_verify_bound(infcx, generic_ty, lower_bound, verify_bound) |
| }), |
| } |
| } |
| |
| fn eval_if_eq( |
| &self, |
| infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| generic_ty: Ty<'tcx>, |
| lower_bound: RegionVid, |
| verify_if_eq_b: ty::Binder<'tcx, VerifyIfEq<'tcx>>, |
| ) -> bool { |
| let generic_ty = self.normalize_to_scc_representatives(infcx.tcx, generic_ty); |
| let verify_if_eq_b = self.normalize_to_scc_representatives(infcx.tcx, verify_if_eq_b); |
| match test_type_match::extract_verify_if_eq(infcx.tcx, &verify_if_eq_b, generic_ty) { |
| Some(r) => { |
| let r_vid = self.to_region_vid(r); |
| self.eval_outlives(r_vid, lower_bound) |
| } |
| None => false, |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// This is a conservative normalization procedure. It takes every |
| /// free region in `value` and replaces it with the |
| /// "representative" of its SCC (see `scc_representatives` field). |
| /// We are guaranteed that if two values normalize to the same |
| /// thing, then they are equal; this is a conservative check in |
| /// that they could still be equal even if they normalize to |
| /// different results. (For example, there might be two regions |
| /// with the same value that are not in the same SCC). |
| /// |
| /// N.B., this is not an ideal approach and I would like to revisit |
| /// it. However, it works pretty well in practice. In particular, |
| /// this is needed to deal with projection outlives bounds like |
| /// |
| /// ```text |
| /// <T as Foo<'0>>::Item: '1 |
| /// ``` |
| /// |
| /// In particular, this routine winds up being important when |
| /// there are bounds like `where <T as Foo<'a>>::Item: 'b` in the |
| /// environment. In this case, if we can show that `'0 == 'a`, |
| /// and that `'b: '1`, then we know that the clause is |
| /// satisfied. In such cases, particularly due to limitations of |
| /// the trait solver =), we usually wind up with a where-clause like |
| /// `T: Foo<'a>` in scope, which thus forces `'0 == 'a` to be added as |
| /// a constraint, and thus ensures that they are in the same SCC. |
| /// |
| /// So why can't we do a more correct routine? Well, we could |
| /// *almost* use the `relate_tys` code, but the way it is |
| /// currently setup it creates inference variables to deal with |
| /// higher-ranked things and so forth, and right now the inference |
| /// context is not permitted to make more inference variables. So |
| /// we use this kind of hacky solution. |
| fn normalize_to_scc_representatives<T>(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, value: T) -> T |
| where |
| T: TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>>, |
| { |
| fold_regions(tcx, value, |r, _db| { |
| let vid = self.to_region_vid(r); |
| let scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(vid); |
| let repr = self.scc_representative(scc); |
| ty::Region::new_var(tcx, repr) |
| }) |
| } |
| |
| /// Evaluate whether `sup_region == sub_region`. |
| /// |
| /// Panics if called before `solve()` executes, |
| // This is `pub` because it's used by unstable external borrowck data users, see `consumers.rs`. |
| pub fn eval_equal(&self, r1: RegionVid, r2: RegionVid) -> bool { |
| self.eval_outlives(r1, r2) && self.eval_outlives(r2, r1) |
| } |
| |
| /// Evaluate whether `sup_region: sub_region`. |
| /// |
| /// Panics if called before `solve()` executes, |
| // This is `pub` because it's used by unstable external borrowck data users, see `consumers.rs`. |
| #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug", ret)] |
| pub fn eval_outlives(&self, sup_region: RegionVid, sub_region: RegionVid) -> bool { |
| debug!( |
| "sup_region's value = {:?} universal={:?}", |
| self.region_value_str(sup_region), |
| self.universal_regions().is_universal_region(sup_region), |
| ); |
| debug!( |
| "sub_region's value = {:?} universal={:?}", |
| self.region_value_str(sub_region), |
| self.universal_regions().is_universal_region(sub_region), |
| ); |
| |
| let sub_region_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(sub_region); |
| let sup_region_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(sup_region); |
| |
| if sub_region_scc == sup_region_scc { |
| debug!("{sup_region:?}: {sub_region:?} holds trivially; they are in the same SCC"); |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| let fr_static = self.universal_regions().fr_static; |
| |
| // If we are checking that `'sup: 'sub`, and `'sub` contains |
| // some placeholder that `'sup` cannot name, then this is only |
| // true if `'sup` outlives static. |
| // |
| // Avoid infinite recursion if `sub_region` is already `'static` |
| if sub_region != fr_static |
| && !self.can_name_all_placeholders(sup_region_scc, sub_region_scc) |
| { |
| debug!( |
| "sub universe `{sub_region_scc:?}` is not nameable \ |
| by super `{sup_region_scc:?}`, promoting to static", |
| ); |
| |
| return self.eval_outlives(sup_region, fr_static); |
| } |
| |
| // Both the `sub_region` and `sup_region` consist of the union |
| // of some number of universal regions (along with the union |
| // of various points in the CFG; ignore those points for |
| // now). Therefore, the sup-region outlives the sub-region if, |
| // for each universal region R1 in the sub-region, there |
| // exists some region R2 in the sup-region that outlives R1. |
| let universal_outlives = |
| self.scc_values.universal_regions_outlived_by(sub_region_scc).all(|r1| { |
| self.scc_values |
| .universal_regions_outlived_by(sup_region_scc) |
| .any(|r2| self.universal_region_relations.outlives(r2, r1)) |
| }); |
| |
| if !universal_outlives { |
| debug!("sub region contains a universal region not present in super"); |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Now we have to compare all the points in the sub region and make |
| // sure they exist in the sup region. |
| |
| if self.universal_regions().is_universal_region(sup_region) { |
| // Micro-opt: universal regions contain all points. |
| debug!("super is universal and hence contains all points"); |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| debug!("comparison between points in sup/sub"); |
| |
| self.scc_values.contains_points(sup_region_scc, sub_region_scc) |
| } |
| |
| /// Once regions have been propagated, this method is used to see |
| /// whether any of the constraints were too strong. In particular, |
| /// we want to check for a case where a universally quantified |
| /// region exceeded its bounds. Consider: |
| /// ```compile_fail |
| /// fn foo<'a, 'b>(x: &'a u32) -> &'b u32 { x } |
| /// ``` |
| /// In this case, returning `x` requires `&'a u32 <: &'b u32` |
| /// and hence we establish (transitively) a constraint that |
| /// `'a: 'b`. The `propagate_constraints` code above will |
| /// therefore add `end('a)` into the region for `'b` -- but we |
| /// have no evidence that `'b` outlives `'a`, so we want to report |
| /// an error. |
| /// |
| /// If `propagated_outlives_requirements` is `Some`, then we will |
| /// push unsatisfied obligations into there. Otherwise, we'll |
| /// report them as errors. |
| fn check_universal_regions( |
| &self, |
| mut propagated_outlives_requirements: Option<&mut Vec<ClosureOutlivesRequirement<'tcx>>>, |
| errors_buffer: &mut RegionErrors<'tcx>, |
| ) { |
| for (fr, fr_definition) in self.definitions.iter_enumerated() { |
| debug!(?fr, ?fr_definition); |
| match fr_definition.origin { |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion => { |
| // Go through each of the universal regions `fr` and check that |
| // they did not grow too large, accumulating any requirements |
| // for our caller into the `outlives_requirements` vector. |
| self.check_universal_region( |
| fr, |
| &mut propagated_outlives_requirements, |
| errors_buffer, |
| ); |
| } |
| |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(placeholder) => { |
| self.check_bound_universal_region(fr, placeholder, errors_buffer); |
| } |
| |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Existential { .. } => { |
| // nothing to check here |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Checks if Polonius has found any unexpected free region relations. |
| /// |
| /// In Polonius terms, a "subset error" (or "illegal subset relation error") is the equivalent |
| /// of NLL's "checking if any region constraints were too strong": a placeholder origin `'a` |
| /// was unexpectedly found to be a subset of another placeholder origin `'b`, and means in NLL |
| /// terms that the "longer free region" `'a` outlived the "shorter free region" `'b`. |
| /// |
| /// More details can be found in this blog post by Niko: |
| /// <https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2019/01/17/polonius-and-region-errors/> |
| /// |
| /// In the canonical example |
| /// ```compile_fail |
| /// fn foo<'a, 'b>(x: &'a u32) -> &'b u32 { x } |
| /// ``` |
| /// returning `x` requires `&'a u32 <: &'b u32` and hence we establish (transitively) a |
| /// constraint that `'a: 'b`. It is an error that we have no evidence that this |
| /// constraint holds. |
| /// |
| /// If `propagated_outlives_requirements` is `Some`, then we will |
| /// push unsatisfied obligations into there. Otherwise, we'll |
| /// report them as errors. |
| fn check_polonius_subset_errors( |
| &self, |
| mut propagated_outlives_requirements: Option<&mut Vec<ClosureOutlivesRequirement<'tcx>>>, |
| errors_buffer: &mut RegionErrors<'tcx>, |
| polonius_output: &PoloniusOutput, |
| ) { |
| debug!( |
| "check_polonius_subset_errors: {} subset_errors", |
| polonius_output.subset_errors.len() |
| ); |
| |
| // Similarly to `check_universal_regions`: a free region relation, which was not explicitly |
| // declared ("known") was found by Polonius, so emit an error, or propagate the |
| // requirements for our caller into the `propagated_outlives_requirements` vector. |
| // |
| // Polonius doesn't model regions ("origins") as CFG-subsets or durations, but the |
| // `longer_fr` and `shorter_fr` terminology will still be used here, for consistency with |
| // the rest of the NLL infrastructure. The "subset origin" is the "longer free region", |
| // and the "superset origin" is the outlived "shorter free region". |
| // |
| // Note: Polonius will produce a subset error at every point where the unexpected |
| // `longer_fr`'s "placeholder loan" is contained in the `shorter_fr`. This can be helpful |
| // for diagnostics in the future, e.g. to point more precisely at the key locations |
| // requiring this constraint to hold. However, the error and diagnostics code downstream |
| // expects that these errors are not duplicated (and that they are in a certain order). |
| // Otherwise, diagnostics messages such as the ones giving names like `'1` to elided or |
| // anonymous lifetimes for example, could give these names differently, while others like |
| // the outlives suggestions or the debug output from `#[rustc_regions]` would be |
| // duplicated. The polonius subset errors are deduplicated here, while keeping the |
| // CFG-location ordering. |
| // We can iterate the HashMap here because the result is sorted afterwards. |
| #[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)] |
| let mut subset_errors: Vec<_> = polonius_output |
| .subset_errors |
| .iter() |
| .flat_map(|(_location, subset_errors)| subset_errors.iter()) |
| .collect(); |
| subset_errors.sort(); |
| subset_errors.dedup(); |
| |
| for &(longer_fr, shorter_fr) in subset_errors.into_iter() { |
| debug!( |
| "check_polonius_subset_errors: subset_error longer_fr={:?},\ |
| shorter_fr={:?}", |
| longer_fr, shorter_fr |
| ); |
| |
| let propagated = self.try_propagate_universal_region_error( |
| longer_fr.into(), |
| shorter_fr.into(), |
| &mut propagated_outlives_requirements, |
| ); |
| if propagated == RegionRelationCheckResult::Error { |
| errors_buffer.push(RegionErrorKind::RegionError { |
| longer_fr: longer_fr.into(), |
| shorter_fr: shorter_fr.into(), |
| fr_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion, |
| is_reported: true, |
| }); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Handle the placeholder errors as usual, until the chalk-rustc-polonius triumvirate has |
| // a more complete picture on how to separate this responsibility. |
| for (fr, fr_definition) in self.definitions.iter_enumerated() { |
| match fr_definition.origin { |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion => { |
| // handled by polonius above |
| } |
| |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(placeholder) => { |
| self.check_bound_universal_region(fr, placeholder, errors_buffer); |
| } |
| |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Existential { .. } => { |
| // nothing to check here |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// The largest universe of any region nameable from this SCC. |
| fn max_nameable_universe(&self, scc: ConstraintSccIndex) -> UniverseIndex { |
| self.scc_annotations[scc].max_nameable_universe() |
| } |
| |
| /// Checks the final value for the free region `fr` to see if it |
| /// grew too large. In particular, examine what `end(X)` points |
| /// wound up in `fr`'s final value; for each `end(X)` where `X != |
| /// fr`, we want to check that `fr: X`. If not, that's either an |
| /// error, or something we have to propagate to our creator. |
| /// |
| /// Things that are to be propagated are accumulated into the |
| /// `outlives_requirements` vector. |
| #[instrument(skip(self, propagated_outlives_requirements, errors_buffer), level = "debug")] |
| fn check_universal_region( |
| &self, |
| longer_fr: RegionVid, |
| propagated_outlives_requirements: &mut Option<&mut Vec<ClosureOutlivesRequirement<'tcx>>>, |
| errors_buffer: &mut RegionErrors<'tcx>, |
| ) { |
| let longer_fr_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(longer_fr); |
| |
| // Because this free region must be in the ROOT universe, we |
| // know it cannot contain any bound universes. |
| assert!(self.max_nameable_universe(longer_fr_scc).is_root()); |
| |
| // Only check all of the relations for the main representative of each |
| // SCC, otherwise just check that we outlive said representative. This |
| // reduces the number of redundant relations propagated out of |
| // closures. |
| // Note that the representative will be a universal region if there is |
| // one in this SCC, so we will always check the representative here. |
| let representative = self.scc_representative(longer_fr_scc); |
| if representative != longer_fr { |
| if let RegionRelationCheckResult::Error = self.check_universal_region_relation( |
| longer_fr, |
| representative, |
| propagated_outlives_requirements, |
| ) { |
| errors_buffer.push(RegionErrorKind::RegionError { |
| longer_fr, |
| shorter_fr: representative, |
| fr_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion, |
| is_reported: true, |
| }); |
| } |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // Find every region `o` such that `fr: o` |
| // (because `fr` includes `end(o)`). |
| let mut error_reported = false; |
| for shorter_fr in self.scc_values.universal_regions_outlived_by(longer_fr_scc) { |
| if let RegionRelationCheckResult::Error = self.check_universal_region_relation( |
| longer_fr, |
| shorter_fr, |
| propagated_outlives_requirements, |
| ) { |
| // We only report the first region error. Subsequent errors are hidden so as |
| // not to overwhelm the user, but we do record them so as to potentially print |
| // better diagnostics elsewhere... |
| errors_buffer.push(RegionErrorKind::RegionError { |
| longer_fr, |
| shorter_fr, |
| fr_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion, |
| is_reported: !error_reported, |
| }); |
| |
| error_reported = true; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Checks that we can prove that `longer_fr: shorter_fr`. If we can't we attempt to propagate |
| /// the constraint outward (e.g. to a closure environment), but if that fails, there is an |
| /// error. |
| fn check_universal_region_relation( |
| &self, |
| longer_fr: RegionVid, |
| shorter_fr: RegionVid, |
| propagated_outlives_requirements: &mut Option<&mut Vec<ClosureOutlivesRequirement<'tcx>>>, |
| ) -> RegionRelationCheckResult { |
| // If it is known that `fr: o`, carry on. |
| if self.universal_region_relations.outlives(longer_fr, shorter_fr) { |
| RegionRelationCheckResult::Ok |
| } else { |
| // If we are not in a context where we can't propagate errors, or we |
| // could not shrink `fr` to something smaller, then just report an |
| // error. |
| // |
| // Note: in this case, we use the unapproximated regions to report the |
| // error. This gives better error messages in some cases. |
| self.try_propagate_universal_region_error( |
| longer_fr, |
| shorter_fr, |
| propagated_outlives_requirements, |
| ) |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Attempt to propagate a region error (e.g. `'a: 'b`) that is not met to a closure's |
| /// creator. If we cannot, then the caller should report an error to the user. |
| fn try_propagate_universal_region_error( |
| &self, |
| longer_fr: RegionVid, |
| shorter_fr: RegionVid, |
| propagated_outlives_requirements: &mut Option<&mut Vec<ClosureOutlivesRequirement<'tcx>>>, |
| ) -> RegionRelationCheckResult { |
| if let Some(propagated_outlives_requirements) = propagated_outlives_requirements |
| // Shrink `longer_fr` until we find a non-local region (if we do). |
| // We'll call it `fr-` -- it's ever so slightly smaller than |
| // `longer_fr`. |
| && let Some(fr_minus) = self.universal_region_relations.non_local_lower_bound(longer_fr) |
| { |
| debug!("try_propagate_universal_region_error: fr_minus={:?}", fr_minus); |
| |
| let blame_constraint = self |
| .best_blame_constraint(longer_fr, NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion, shorter_fr) |
| .0; |
| |
| // Grow `shorter_fr` until we find some non-local regions. (We |
| // always will.) We'll call them `shorter_fr+` -- they're ever |
| // so slightly larger than `shorter_fr`. |
| let shorter_fr_plus = |
| self.universal_region_relations.non_local_upper_bounds(shorter_fr); |
| debug!("try_propagate_universal_region_error: shorter_fr_plus={:?}", shorter_fr_plus); |
| for fr in shorter_fr_plus { |
| // Push the constraint `fr-: shorter_fr+` |
| propagated_outlives_requirements.push(ClosureOutlivesRequirement { |
| subject: ClosureOutlivesSubject::Region(fr_minus), |
| outlived_free_region: fr, |
| blame_span: blame_constraint.cause.span, |
| category: blame_constraint.category, |
| }); |
| } |
| return RegionRelationCheckResult::Propagated; |
| } |
| |
| RegionRelationCheckResult::Error |
| } |
| |
| fn check_bound_universal_region( |
| &self, |
| longer_fr: RegionVid, |
| placeholder: ty::PlaceholderRegion, |
| errors_buffer: &mut RegionErrors<'tcx>, |
| ) { |
| debug!("check_bound_universal_region(fr={:?}, placeholder={:?})", longer_fr, placeholder,); |
| |
| let longer_fr_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(longer_fr); |
| debug!("check_bound_universal_region: longer_fr_scc={:?}", longer_fr_scc,); |
| |
| // If we have some bound universal region `'a`, then the only |
| // elements it can contain is itself -- we don't know anything |
| // else about it! |
| if let Some(error_element) = self |
| .scc_values |
| .elements_contained_in(longer_fr_scc) |
| .find(|e| *e != RegionElement::PlaceholderRegion(placeholder)) |
| { |
| // Stop after the first error, it gets too noisy otherwise, and does not provide more information. |
| errors_buffer.push(RegionErrorKind::BoundUniversalRegionError { |
| longer_fr, |
| error_element, |
| placeholder, |
| }); |
| } else { |
| debug!("check_bound_universal_region: all bounds satisfied"); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) fn constraint_path_between_regions( |
| &self, |
| from_region: RegionVid, |
| to_region: RegionVid, |
| ) -> Option<Vec<OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>> { |
| if from_region == to_region { |
| bug!("Tried to find a path between {from_region:?} and itself!"); |
| } |
| self.constraint_path_to(from_region, |to| to == to_region, true).map(|o| o.0) |
| } |
| |
| /// Walks the graph of constraints (where `'a: 'b` is considered |
| /// an edge `'a -> 'b`) to find a path from `from_region` to |
| /// `to_region`. |
| /// |
| /// Returns: a series of constraints as well as the region `R` |
| /// that passed the target test. |
| /// If `include_static_outlives_all` is `true`, then the synthetic |
| /// outlives constraints `'static -> a` for every region `a` are |
| /// considered in the search, otherwise they are ignored. |
| #[instrument(skip(self, target_test), ret)] |
| pub(crate) fn constraint_path_to( |
| &self, |
| from_region: RegionVid, |
| target_test: impl Fn(RegionVid) -> bool, |
| include_placeholder_static: bool, |
| ) -> Option<(Vec<OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>, RegionVid)> { |
| self.find_constraint_path_between_regions_inner( |
| true, |
| from_region, |
| &target_test, |
| include_placeholder_static, |
| ) |
| .or_else(|| { |
| self.find_constraint_path_between_regions_inner( |
| false, |
| from_region, |
| &target_test, |
| include_placeholder_static, |
| ) |
| }) |
| } |
| |
| /// The constraints we get from equating the hidden type of each use of an opaque |
| /// with its final hidden type may end up getting preferred over other, potentially |
| /// longer constraint paths. |
| /// |
| /// Given that we compute the final hidden type by relying on this existing constraint |
| /// path, this can easily end up hiding the actual reason for why we require these regions |
| /// to be equal. |
| /// |
| /// To handle this, we first look at the path while ignoring these constraints and then |
| /// retry while considering them. This is not perfect, as the `from_region` may have already |
| /// been partially related to its argument region, so while we rely on a member constraint |
| /// to get a complete path, the most relevant step of that path already existed before then. |
| fn find_constraint_path_between_regions_inner( |
| &self, |
| ignore_opaque_type_constraints: bool, |
| from_region: RegionVid, |
| target_test: impl Fn(RegionVid) -> bool, |
| include_placeholder_static: bool, |
| ) -> Option<(Vec<OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>, RegionVid)> { |
| let mut context = IndexVec::from_elem(Trace::NotVisited, &self.definitions); |
| context[from_region] = Trace::StartRegion; |
| |
| let fr_static = self.universal_regions().fr_static; |
| |
| // Use a deque so that we do a breadth-first search. We will |
| // stop at the first match, which ought to be the shortest |
| // path (fewest constraints). |
| let mut deque = VecDeque::new(); |
| deque.push_back(from_region); |
| |
| while let Some(r) = deque.pop_front() { |
| debug!( |
| "constraint_path_to: from_region={:?} r={:?} value={}", |
| from_region, |
| r, |
| self.region_value_str(r), |
| ); |
| |
| // Check if we reached the region we were looking for. If so, |
| // we can reconstruct the path that led to it and return it. |
| if target_test(r) { |
| let mut result = vec![]; |
| let mut p = r; |
| // This loop is cold and runs at the end, which is why we delay |
| // `OutlivesConstraint` construction until now. |
| loop { |
| match context[p] { |
| Trace::FromGraph(c) => { |
| p = c.sup; |
| result.push(*c); |
| } |
| |
| Trace::FromStatic(sub) => { |
| let c = OutlivesConstraint { |
| sup: fr_static, |
| sub, |
| locations: Locations::All(DUMMY_SP), |
| span: DUMMY_SP, |
| category: ConstraintCategory::Internal, |
| variance_info: ty::VarianceDiagInfo::default(), |
| from_closure: false, |
| }; |
| p = c.sup; |
| result.push(c); |
| } |
| |
| Trace::StartRegion => { |
| result.reverse(); |
| return Some((result, r)); |
| } |
| |
| Trace::NotVisited => { |
| bug!("found unvisited region {:?} on path to {:?}", p, r) |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Otherwise, walk over the outgoing constraints and |
| // enqueue any regions we find, keeping track of how we |
| // reached them. |
| |
| // A constraint like `'r: 'x` can come from our constraint |
| // graph. |
| |
| // Always inline this closure because it can be hot. |
| let mut handle_trace = #[inline(always)] |
| |sub, trace| { |
| if let Trace::NotVisited = context[sub] { |
| context[sub] = trace; |
| deque.push_back(sub); |
| } |
| }; |
| |
| // If this is the `'static` region and the graph's direction is normal, then set up the |
| // Edges iterator to return all regions (#53178). |
| if r == fr_static && self.constraint_graph.is_normal() { |
| for sub in self.constraint_graph.outgoing_edges_from_static() { |
| handle_trace(sub, Trace::FromStatic(sub)); |
| } |
| } else { |
| let edges = self.constraint_graph.outgoing_edges_from_graph(r, &self.constraints); |
| // This loop can be hot. |
| for constraint in edges { |
| match constraint.category { |
| ConstraintCategory::OutlivesUnnameablePlaceholder(_) |
| if !include_placeholder_static => |
| { |
| debug!("Ignoring illegal placeholder constraint: {constraint:?}"); |
| continue; |
| } |
| ConstraintCategory::OpaqueType if ignore_opaque_type_constraints => { |
| debug!("Ignoring member constraint: {constraint:?}"); |
| continue; |
| } |
| _ => {} |
| } |
| |
| debug_assert_eq!(constraint.sup, r); |
| handle_trace(constraint.sub, Trace::FromGraph(constraint)); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| None |
| } |
| |
| /// Finds some region R such that `fr1: R` and `R` is live at `location`. |
| #[instrument(skip(self), level = "trace", ret)] |
| pub(crate) fn find_sub_region_live_at(&self, fr1: RegionVid, location: Location) -> RegionVid { |
| trace!(scc = ?self.constraint_sccs.scc(fr1)); |
| trace!(universe = ?self.max_nameable_universe(self.constraint_sccs.scc(fr1))); |
| self.constraint_path_to(fr1, |r| { |
| trace!(?r, liveness_constraints=?self.liveness_constraints.pretty_print_live_points(r)); |
| self.liveness_constraints.is_live_at(r, location) |
| }, true).unwrap().1 |
| } |
| |
| /// Get the region outlived by `longer_fr` and live at `element`. |
| pub(crate) fn region_from_element( |
| &self, |
| longer_fr: RegionVid, |
| element: &RegionElement, |
| ) -> RegionVid { |
| match *element { |
| RegionElement::Location(l) => self.find_sub_region_live_at(longer_fr, l), |
| RegionElement::RootUniversalRegion(r) => r, |
| RegionElement::PlaceholderRegion(error_placeholder) => self |
| .definitions |
| .iter_enumerated() |
| .find_map(|(r, definition)| match definition.origin { |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(p) if p == error_placeholder => Some(r), |
| _ => None, |
| }) |
| .unwrap(), |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Get the region definition of `r`. |
| pub(crate) fn region_definition(&self, r: RegionVid) -> &RegionDefinition<'tcx> { |
| &self.definitions[r] |
| } |
| |
| /// Check if the SCC of `r` contains `upper`. |
| pub(crate) fn upper_bound_in_region_scc(&self, r: RegionVid, upper: RegionVid) -> bool { |
| let r_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r); |
| self.scc_values.contains(r_scc, upper) |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) fn universal_regions(&self) -> &UniversalRegions<'tcx> { |
| &self.universal_region_relations.universal_regions |
| } |
| |
| /// Tries to find the best constraint to blame for the fact that |
| /// `R: from_region`, where `R` is some region that meets |
| /// `target_test`. This works by following the constraint graph, |
| /// creating a constraint path that forces `R` to outlive |
| /// `from_region`, and then finding the best choices within that |
| /// path to blame. |
| #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))] |
| pub(crate) fn best_blame_constraint( |
| &self, |
| from_region: RegionVid, |
| from_region_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin, |
| to_region: RegionVid, |
| ) -> (BlameConstraint<'tcx>, Vec<OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>) { |
| assert!(from_region != to_region, "Trying to blame a region for itself!"); |
| |
| let path = self.constraint_path_between_regions(from_region, to_region).unwrap(); |
| |
| // If we are passing through a constraint added because we reached an unnameable placeholder `'unnameable`, |
| // redirect search towards `'unnameable`. |
| let due_to_placeholder_outlives = path.iter().find_map(|c| { |
| if let ConstraintCategory::OutlivesUnnameablePlaceholder(unnameable) = c.category { |
| Some(unnameable) |
| } else { |
| None |
| } |
| }); |
| |
| // Edge case: it's possible that `'from_region` is an unnameable placeholder. |
| let path = if let Some(unnameable) = due_to_placeholder_outlives |
| && unnameable != from_region |
| { |
| // We ignore the extra edges due to unnameable placeholders to get |
| // an explanation that was present in the original constraint graph. |
| self.constraint_path_to(from_region, |r| r == unnameable, false).unwrap().0 |
| } else { |
| path |
| }; |
| |
| debug!( |
| "path={:#?}", |
| path.iter() |
| .map(|c| format!( |
| "{:?} ({:?}: {:?})", |
| c, |
| self.constraint_sccs.scc(c.sup), |
| self.constraint_sccs.scc(c.sub), |
| )) |
| .collect::<Vec<_>>() |
| ); |
| |
| // We try to avoid reporting a `ConstraintCategory::Predicate` as our best constraint. |
| // Instead, we use it to produce an improved `ObligationCauseCode`. |
| // FIXME - determine what we should do if we encounter multiple |
| // `ConstraintCategory::Predicate` constraints. Currently, we just pick the first one. |
| let cause_code = path |
| .iter() |
| .find_map(|constraint| { |
| if let ConstraintCategory::Predicate(predicate_span) = constraint.category { |
| // We currently do not store the `DefId` in the `ConstraintCategory` |
| // for performances reasons. The error reporting code used by NLL only |
| // uses the span, so this doesn't cause any problems at the moment. |
| Some(ObligationCauseCode::WhereClause(CRATE_DEF_ID.to_def_id(), predicate_span)) |
| } else { |
| None |
| } |
| }) |
| .unwrap_or_else(|| ObligationCauseCode::Misc); |
| |
| // When reporting an error, there is typically a chain of constraints leading from some |
| // "source" region which must outlive some "target" region. |
| // In most cases, we prefer to "blame" the constraints closer to the target -- |
| // but there is one exception. When constraints arise from higher-ranked subtyping, |
| // we generally prefer to blame the source value, |
| // as the "target" in this case tends to be some type annotation that the user gave. |
| // Therefore, if we find that the region origin is some instantiation |
| // of a higher-ranked region, we start our search from the "source" point |
| // rather than the "target", and we also tweak a few other things. |
| // |
| // An example might be this bit of Rust code: |
| // |
| // ```rust |
| // let x: fn(&'static ()) = |_| {}; |
| // let y: for<'a> fn(&'a ()) = x; |
| // ``` |
| // |
| // In MIR, this will be converted into a combination of assignments and type ascriptions. |
| // In particular, the 'static is imposed through a type ascription: |
| // |
| // ```rust |
| // x = ...; |
| // AscribeUserType(x, fn(&'static ()) |
| // y = x; |
| // ``` |
| // |
| // We wind up ultimately with constraints like |
| // |
| // ```rust |
| // !a: 'temp1 // from the `y = x` statement |
| // 'temp1: 'temp2 |
| // 'temp2: 'static // from the AscribeUserType |
| // ``` |
| // |
| // and here we prefer to blame the source (the y = x statement). |
| let blame_source = match from_region_origin { |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion => true, |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(_) => false, |
| // `'existential: 'whatever` never results in a region error by itself. |
| // We may always infer it to `'static` afterall. This means while an error |
| // path may go through an existential, these existentials are never the |
| // `from_region`. |
| NllRegionVariableOrigin::Existential { name: _ } => { |
| unreachable!("existentials can outlive everything") |
| } |
| }; |
| |
| // To pick a constraint to blame, we organize constraints by how interesting we expect them |
| // to be in diagnostics, then pick the most interesting one closest to either the source or |
| // the target on our constraint path. |
| let constraint_interest = |constraint: &OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>| { |
| // Try to avoid blaming constraints from desugarings, since they may not clearly match |
| // match what users have written. As an exception, allow blaming returns generated by |
| // `?` desugaring, since the correspondence is fairly clear. |
| let category = if let Some(kind) = constraint.span.desugaring_kind() |
| && (kind != DesugaringKind::QuestionMark |
| || !matches!(constraint.category, ConstraintCategory::Return(_))) |
| { |
| ConstraintCategory::Boring |
| } else { |
| constraint.category |
| }; |
| |
| let interest = match category { |
| // Returns usually provide a type to blame and have specially written diagnostics, |
| // so prioritize them. |
| ConstraintCategory::Return(_) => 0, |
| // Unsizing coercions are interesting, since we have a note for that: |
| // `BorrowExplanation::add_object_lifetime_default_note`. |
| // FIXME(dianne): That note shouldn't depend on a coercion being blamed; see issue |
| // #131008 for an example of where we currently don't emit it but should. |
| // Once the note is handled properly, this case should be removed. Until then, it |
| // should be as limited as possible; the note is prone to false positives and this |
| // constraint usually isn't best to blame. |
| ConstraintCategory::Cast { |
| unsize_to: Some(unsize_ty), |
| is_implicit_coercion: true, |
| } if to_region == self.universal_regions().fr_static |
| // Mirror the note's condition, to minimize how often this diverts blame. |
| && let ty::Adt(_, args) = unsize_ty.kind() |
| && args.iter().any(|arg| arg.as_type().is_some_and(|ty| ty.is_trait())) |
| // Mimic old logic for this, to minimize false positives in tests. |
| && !path |
| .iter() |
| .any(|c| matches!(c.category, ConstraintCategory::TypeAnnotation(_))) => |
| { |
| 1 |
| } |
| // Between other interesting constraints, order by their position on the `path`. |
| ConstraintCategory::Yield |
| | ConstraintCategory::UseAsConst |
| | ConstraintCategory::UseAsStatic |
| | ConstraintCategory::TypeAnnotation( |
| AnnotationSource::Ascription |
| | AnnotationSource::Declaration |
| | AnnotationSource::OpaqueCast, |
| ) |
| | ConstraintCategory::Cast { .. } |
| | ConstraintCategory::CallArgument(_) |
| | ConstraintCategory::CopyBound |
| | ConstraintCategory::SizedBound |
| | ConstraintCategory::Assignment |
| | ConstraintCategory::Usage |
| | ConstraintCategory::ClosureUpvar(_) => 2, |
| // Generic arguments are unlikely to be what relates regions together |
| ConstraintCategory::TypeAnnotation(AnnotationSource::GenericArg) => 3, |
| // We handle predicates and opaque types specially; don't prioritize them here. |
| ConstraintCategory::Predicate(_) | ConstraintCategory::OpaqueType => 4, |
| // `Boring` constraints can correspond to user-written code and have useful spans, |
| // but don't provide any other useful information for diagnostics. |
| ConstraintCategory::Boring => 5, |
| // `BoringNoLocation` constraints can point to user-written code, but are less |
| // specific, and are not used for relations that would make sense to blame. |
| ConstraintCategory::BoringNoLocation => 6, |
| // Do not blame internal constraints if we can avoid it. Never blame |
| // the `'region: 'static` constraints introduced by placeholder outlives. |
| ConstraintCategory::Internal => 7, |
| ConstraintCategory::OutlivesUnnameablePlaceholder(_) => 8, |
| }; |
| |
| debug!("constraint {constraint:?} category: {category:?}, interest: {interest:?}"); |
| |
| interest |
| }; |
| |
| let best_choice = if blame_source { |
| path.iter().enumerate().rev().min_by_key(|(_, c)| constraint_interest(c)).unwrap().0 |
| } else { |
| path.iter().enumerate().min_by_key(|(_, c)| constraint_interest(c)).unwrap().0 |
| }; |
| |
| debug!(?best_choice, ?blame_source); |
| |
| let best_constraint = if let Some(next) = path.get(best_choice + 1) |
| && matches!(path[best_choice].category, ConstraintCategory::Return(_)) |
| && next.category == ConstraintCategory::OpaqueType |
| { |
| // The return expression is being influenced by the return type being |
| // impl Trait, point at the return type and not the return expr. |
| *next |
| } else if path[best_choice].category == ConstraintCategory::Return(ReturnConstraint::Normal) |
| && let Some(field) = path.iter().find_map(|p| { |
| if let ConstraintCategory::ClosureUpvar(f) = p.category { Some(f) } else { None } |
| }) |
| { |
| OutlivesConstraint { |
| category: ConstraintCategory::Return(ReturnConstraint::ClosureUpvar(field)), |
| ..path[best_choice] |
| } |
| } else { |
| path[best_choice] |
| }; |
| |
| assert!( |
| !matches!( |
| best_constraint.category, |
| ConstraintCategory::OutlivesUnnameablePlaceholder(_) |
| ), |
| "Illegal placeholder constraint blamed; should have redirected to other region relation" |
| ); |
| |
| let blame_constraint = BlameConstraint { |
| category: best_constraint.category, |
| from_closure: best_constraint.from_closure, |
| cause: ObligationCause::new(best_constraint.span, CRATE_DEF_ID, cause_code.clone()), |
| variance_info: best_constraint.variance_info, |
| }; |
| (blame_constraint, path) |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) fn universe_info(&self, universe: ty::UniverseIndex) -> UniverseInfo<'tcx> { |
| // Query canonicalization can create local superuniverses (for example in |
| // `InferCtx::query_response_instantiation_guess`), but they don't have an associated |
| // `UniverseInfo` explaining why they were created. |
| // This can cause ICEs if these causes are accessed in diagnostics, for example in issue |
| // #114907 where this happens via liveness and dropck outlives results. |
| // Therefore, we return a default value in case that happens, which should at worst emit a |
| // suboptimal error, instead of the ICE. |
| self.universe_causes.get(&universe).cloned().unwrap_or_else(UniverseInfo::other) |
| } |
| |
| /// Tries to find the terminator of the loop in which the region 'r' resides. |
| /// Returns the location of the terminator if found. |
| pub(crate) fn find_loop_terminator_location( |
| &self, |
| r: RegionVid, |
| body: &Body<'_>, |
| ) -> Option<Location> { |
| let scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(r); |
| let locations = self.scc_values.locations_outlived_by(scc); |
| for location in locations { |
| let bb = &body[location.block]; |
| if let Some(terminator) = &bb.terminator |
| // terminator of a loop should be TerminatorKind::FalseUnwind |
| && let TerminatorKind::FalseUnwind { .. } = terminator.kind |
| { |
| return Some(location); |
| } |
| } |
| None |
| } |
| |
| /// Access to the SCC constraint graph. |
| /// This can be used to quickly under-approximate the regions which are equal to each other |
| /// and their relative orderings. |
| // This is `pub` because it's used by unstable external borrowck data users, see `consumers.rs`. |
| pub fn constraint_sccs(&self) -> &ConstraintSccs { |
| &self.constraint_sccs |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns the representative `RegionVid` for a given SCC. |
| /// See `RegionTracker` for how a region variable ID is chosen. |
| /// |
| /// It is a hacky way to manage checking regions for equality, |
| /// since we can 'canonicalize' each region to the representative |
| /// of its SCC and be sure that -- if they have the same repr -- |
| /// they *must* be equal (though not having the same repr does not |
| /// mean they are unequal). |
| fn scc_representative(&self, scc: ConstraintSccIndex) -> RegionVid { |
| self.scc_annotations[scc].representative.rvid() |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) fn liveness_constraints(&self) -> &LivenessValues { |
| &self.liveness_constraints |
| } |
| |
| /// When using `-Zpolonius=next`, records the given live loans for the loan scopes and active |
| /// loans dataflow computations. |
| pub(crate) fn record_live_loans(&mut self, live_loans: LiveLoans) { |
| self.liveness_constraints.record_live_loans(live_loans); |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns whether the `loan_idx` is live at the given `location`: whether its issuing |
| /// region is contained within the type of a variable that is live at this point. |
| /// Note: for now, the sets of live loans is only available when using `-Zpolonius=next`. |
| pub(crate) fn is_loan_live_at(&self, loan_idx: BorrowIndex, location: Location) -> bool { |
| let point = self.liveness_constraints.point_from_location(location); |
| self.liveness_constraints.is_loan_live_at(loan_idx, point) |
| } |
| } |
| |
| #[derive(Clone, Debug)] |
| pub(crate) struct BlameConstraint<'tcx> { |
| pub category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, |
| pub from_closure: bool, |
| pub cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>, |
| pub variance_info: ty::VarianceDiagInfo<TyCtxt<'tcx>>, |
| } |