| //! An infrastructure to mechanically analyse proof trees. |
| //! |
| //! It is unavoidable that this representation is somewhat |
| //! lossy as it should hide quite a few semantically relevant things, |
| //! e.g. canonicalization and the order of nested goals. |
| //! |
| //! @lcnr: However, a lot of the weirdness here is not strictly necessary |
| //! and could be improved in the future. This is mostly good enough for |
| //! coherence right now and was annoying to implement, so I am leaving it |
| //! as is until we start using it for something else. |
| |
| use std::assert_matches; |
| |
| use rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt; |
| use rustc_macros::extension; |
| use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{Certainty, Goal, GoalSource, NoSolution, QueryResult}; |
| use rustc_middle::ty::{TyCtxt, VisitorResult, try_visit}; |
| use rustc_middle::{bug, ty}; |
| use rustc_next_trait_solver::canonical::instantiate_canonical_state; |
| use rustc_next_trait_solver::resolve::eager_resolve_vars; |
| use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{MaybeCause, MaybeInfo, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _, inspect}; |
| use rustc_span::Span; |
| use tracing::instrument; |
| |
| use crate::solve::delegate::SolverDelegate; |
| |
| pub struct InspectConfig { |
| pub max_depth: usize, |
| } |
| |
| pub struct InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> { |
| infcx: &'a SolverDelegate<'tcx>, |
| depth: usize, |
| orig_values: Vec<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>, |
| goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, |
| result: Result<Certainty, NoSolution>, |
| final_revision: &'tcx inspect::Probe<TyCtxt<'tcx>>, |
| source: GoalSource, |
| } |
| |
| pub struct InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> { |
| goal: &'a InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx>, |
| kind: inspect::ProbeKind<TyCtxt<'tcx>>, |
| steps: Vec<&'a inspect::ProbeStep<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>, |
| final_state: inspect::CanonicalState<TyCtxt<'tcx>, ()>, |
| result: QueryResult<'tcx>, |
| shallow_certainty: Certainty, |
| } |
| |
| impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> { |
| pub fn kind(&self) -> inspect::ProbeKind<TyCtxt<'tcx>> { |
| self.kind |
| } |
| |
| pub fn result(&self) -> Result<Certainty, NoSolution> { |
| self.result.map(|c| c.value.certainty) |
| } |
| |
| pub fn goal(&self) -> &'a InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> { |
| self.goal |
| } |
| |
| /// Certainty passed into `evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response`. |
| /// |
| /// If this certainty is `Yes`, then we must be confident that the candidate |
| /// must hold iff it's nested goals hold. This is not true if the certainty is |
| /// `Maybe(..)`, which suggests we forced ambiguity instead. |
| /// |
| /// This is *not* the certainty of the candidate's full nested evaluation, which |
| /// can be accessed with [`Self::result`] instead. |
| pub fn shallow_certainty(&self) -> Certainty { |
| self.shallow_certainty |
| } |
| |
| /// Visit all nested goals of this candidate without rolling |
| /// back their inference constraints. This function modifies |
| /// the state of the `infcx`. |
| pub fn visit_nested_no_probe<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result { |
| for goal in self.instantiate_nested_goals(visitor.span()) { |
| try_visit!(goal.visit_with(visitor)); |
| } |
| |
| V::Result::output() |
| } |
| |
| /// Instantiate the nested goals for the candidate without rolling back their |
| /// inference constraints. This function modifies the state of the `infcx`. |
| /// |
| /// See [`Self::instantiate_impl_args`] if you need the impl args too. |
| #[instrument( |
| level = "debug", |
| skip_all, |
| fields(goal = ?self.goal.goal, steps = ?self.steps) |
| )] |
| pub fn instantiate_nested_goals(&self, span: Span) -> Vec<InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx>> { |
| let infcx = self.goal.infcx; |
| let param_env = self.goal.goal.param_env; |
| let mut orig_values = self.goal.orig_values.clone(); |
| |
| let mut instantiated_goals = vec![]; |
| for step in &self.steps { |
| match **step { |
| inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(source, goal) => instantiated_goals.push(( |
| source, |
| instantiate_canonical_state(infcx, span, param_env, &mut orig_values, goal), |
| )), |
| inspect::ProbeStep::RecordImplArgs { .. } => {} |
| inspect::ProbeStep::MakeCanonicalResponse { .. } |
| | inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(_) => unreachable!(), |
| } |
| } |
| |
| let () = |
| instantiate_canonical_state(infcx, span, param_env, &mut orig_values, self.final_state); |
| |
| instantiated_goals |
| .into_iter() |
| .map(|(source, goal)| self.instantiate_proof_tree_for_nested_goal(source, goal, span)) |
| .collect() |
| } |
| |
| /// Instantiate the args of an impl if this candidate came from a |
| /// `CandidateSource::Impl`. This function modifies the state of the |
| /// `infcx`. |
| #[instrument( |
| level = "debug", |
| skip_all, |
| fields(goal = ?self.goal.goal, steps = ?self.steps) |
| )] |
| pub fn instantiate_impl_args(&self, span: Span) -> ty::GenericArgsRef<'tcx> { |
| let infcx = self.goal.infcx; |
| let param_env = self.goal.goal.param_env; |
| let mut orig_values = self.goal.orig_values.clone(); |
| |
| for step in &self.steps { |
| match **step { |
| inspect::ProbeStep::RecordImplArgs { impl_args } => { |
| let impl_args = instantiate_canonical_state( |
| infcx, |
| span, |
| param_env, |
| &mut orig_values, |
| impl_args, |
| ); |
| |
| let () = instantiate_canonical_state( |
| infcx, |
| span, |
| param_env, |
| &mut orig_values, |
| self.final_state, |
| ); |
| |
| return eager_resolve_vars(infcx, impl_args); |
| } |
| inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(..) => {} |
| inspect::ProbeStep::MakeCanonicalResponse { .. } |
| | inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(_) => unreachable!(), |
| } |
| } |
| |
| bug!("expected impl args probe step for `instantiate_impl_args`"); |
| } |
| |
| pub fn instantiate_proof_tree_for_nested_goal( |
| &self, |
| source: GoalSource, |
| goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, |
| span: Span, |
| ) -> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> { |
| let infcx = self.goal.infcx; |
| match goal.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() { |
| Some(ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(ty::NormalizesTo { .. })) => { |
| // We don't handle `NormalizesTo` as a nested goal |
| unreachable!() |
| } |
| _ => { |
| // We're using a probe here as evaluating a goal could constrain |
| // inference variables by choosing one candidate. If we then recurse |
| // into another candidate who ends up with different inference |
| // constraints, we get an ICE if we already applied the constraints |
| // from the chosen candidate. |
| let proof_tree = |
| infcx.probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree(goal, span).1); |
| InspectGoal::new(infcx, self.goal.depth + 1, proof_tree, source) |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Visit all nested goals of this candidate, rolling back |
| /// all inference constraints. |
| pub fn visit_nested_in_probe<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result { |
| self.goal.infcx.probe(|_| self.visit_nested_no_probe(visitor)) |
| } |
| } |
| |
| impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> { |
| pub fn infcx(&self) -> &'a InferCtxt<'tcx> { |
| self.infcx |
| } |
| |
| pub fn goal(&self) -> Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>> { |
| self.goal |
| } |
| |
| pub fn result(&self) -> Result<Certainty, NoSolution> { |
| self.result |
| } |
| |
| pub fn source(&self) -> GoalSource { |
| self.source |
| } |
| |
| pub fn depth(&self) -> usize { |
| self.depth |
| } |
| |
| pub fn orig_values(&self) -> &[ty::GenericArg<'tcx>] { |
| &self.orig_values |
| } |
| |
| fn candidates_recur( |
| &'a self, |
| candidates: &mut Vec<InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx>>, |
| steps: &mut Vec<&'a inspect::ProbeStep<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>, |
| probe: &'a inspect::Probe<TyCtxt<'tcx>>, |
| ) { |
| let mut shallow_certainty = None; |
| for step in &probe.steps { |
| match *step { |
| inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(..) | inspect::ProbeStep::RecordImplArgs { .. } => { |
| steps.push(step) |
| } |
| inspect::ProbeStep::MakeCanonicalResponse { shallow_certainty: c } => { |
| assert_matches!( |
| shallow_certainty.replace(c), |
| None | Some(Certainty::Maybe(MaybeInfo { |
| cause: MaybeCause::Ambiguity, |
| opaque_types_jank: _, |
| stalled_on_coroutines: _, |
| })) |
| ); |
| } |
| inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(ref probe) => { |
| match probe.kind { |
| // These never assemble candidates for the goal we're trying to solve. |
| inspect::ProbeKind::ProjectionCompatibility |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => continue, |
| |
| inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::Root { .. } |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { .. } |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { .. } |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::RigidAlias { .. } => { |
| // Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent |
| // but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals |
| // afterwards. |
| let num_steps = steps.len(); |
| self.candidates_recur(candidates, steps, probe); |
| steps.truncate(num_steps); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| match probe.kind { |
| inspect::ProbeKind::ProjectionCompatibility |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => { |
| bug!() |
| } |
| |
| inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly | inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly => {} |
| |
| // We add a candidate even for the root evaluation if there |
| // is only one way to prove a given goal, e.g. for `WellFormed`. |
| inspect::ProbeKind::Root { result } |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source: _, result } |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result } |
| | inspect::ProbeKind::RigidAlias { result } => { |
| // We only add a candidate if `shallow_certainty` was set, which means |
| // that we ended up calling `evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response`. |
| if let Some(shallow_certainty) = shallow_certainty { |
| candidates.push(InspectCandidate { |
| goal: self, |
| kind: probe.kind, |
| steps: steps.clone(), |
| final_state: probe.final_state, |
| shallow_certainty, |
| result, |
| }); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| pub fn candidates(&'a self) -> Vec<InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx>> { |
| let mut candidates = vec![]; |
| let mut nested_goals = vec![]; |
| self.candidates_recur(&mut candidates, &mut nested_goals, &self.final_revision); |
| candidates |
| } |
| |
| /// Returns the single candidate applicable for the current goal, if it exists. |
| /// |
| /// Returns `None` if there are either no or multiple applicable candidates. |
| pub fn unique_applicable_candidate(&'a self) -> Option<InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx>> { |
| // FIXME(-Znext-solver): This does not handle impl candidates |
| // hidden by env candidates. |
| let mut candidates = self.candidates(); |
| candidates.retain(|c| c.result().is_ok()); |
| candidates.pop().filter(|_| candidates.is_empty()) |
| } |
| |
| fn new( |
| infcx: &'a InferCtxt<'tcx>, |
| depth: usize, |
| root: inspect::GoalEvaluation<TyCtxt<'tcx>>, |
| source: GoalSource, |
| ) -> Self { |
| let infcx = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx); |
| |
| let inspect::GoalEvaluation { uncanonicalized_goal, orig_values, final_revision, result } = |
| root; |
| // If there's a normalizes-to goal, AND the evaluation result with the result of |
| // constraining the normalizes-to RHS and computing the nested goals. |
| let result = result.map(|ok| ok.value.certainty); |
| |
| InspectGoal { |
| infcx, |
| depth, |
| orig_values, |
| goal: eager_resolve_vars(infcx, uncanonicalized_goal), |
| result, |
| final_revision, |
| source, |
| } |
| } |
| |
| pub(crate) fn visit_with<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result { |
| if self.depth < visitor.config().max_depth { |
| try_visit!(visitor.visit_goal(self)); |
| V::Result::output() |
| } else { |
| visitor.on_recursion_limit() |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// The public API to interact with proof trees. |
| pub trait ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> { |
| type Result: VisitorResult = (); |
| |
| fn span(&self) -> Span; |
| |
| fn config(&self) -> InspectConfig { |
| InspectConfig { max_depth: 10 } |
| } |
| |
| fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> Self::Result; |
| |
| fn on_recursion_limit(&mut self) -> Self::Result { |
| Self::Result::output() |
| } |
| } |
| |
| #[extension(pub trait InferCtxtProofTreeExt<'tcx>)] |
| impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> { |
| fn visit_proof_tree<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>( |
| &self, |
| goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, |
| visitor: &mut V, |
| ) -> V::Result { |
| self.visit_proof_tree_at_depth(goal, 0, visitor) |
| } |
| |
| fn visit_proof_tree_at_depth<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>( |
| &self, |
| goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, |
| depth: usize, |
| visitor: &mut V, |
| ) -> V::Result { |
| let (_, proof_tree) = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(self) |
| .evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree(goal, visitor.span()); |
| visitor.visit_goal(&InspectGoal::new(self, depth, proof_tree, GoalSource::Misc)) |
| } |
| } |