blob: 0a1ad883c297777cc88185acbb241553fb0a10f7 [file]
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
use rustc_ast::attr::data_structures::CfgEntry;
use rustc_ast::{AttrKind, SyntheticAttr};
use rustc_lint::{EarlyContext, EarlyLintPass};
use rustc_session::declare_lint_pass;
use rustc_span::sym;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for usage of `cfg` that excludes code from `test` builds. (i.e., `#[cfg(not(test))]`)
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// This may give the false impression that a codebase has 100% coverage, yet actually has untested code.
/// Enabling this also guards against excessive mockery as well, which is an anti-pattern.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # fn important_check() {}
/// #[cfg(not(test))]
/// important_check(); // I'm not actually tested, but not including me will falsely increase coverage!
/// ```
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// # fn important_check() {}
/// important_check();
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.81.0"]
pub CFG_NOT_TEST,
restriction,
"enforce against excluding code from test builds"
}
declare_lint_pass!(CfgNotTest => [CFG_NOT_TEST]);
impl EarlyLintPass for CfgNotTest {
fn check_attribute(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, attr: &rustc_ast::Attribute) {
if let AttrKind::Synthetic(synthetic) = &attr.kind
&& let SyntheticAttr::CfgTrace(cfg) = &**synthetic
&& contains_not_test(cfg, false)
{
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
CFG_NOT_TEST,
attr.span,
"code is excluded from test builds",
|diag| {
diag.help("consider not excluding any code from test builds");
diag.note_once("this could increase code coverage despite not actually being tested");
},
);
}
}
}
fn contains_not_test(cfg: &CfgEntry, not: bool) -> bool {
match cfg {
CfgEntry::All(subs, _) | CfgEntry::Any(subs, _) => subs.iter().any(|item| contains_not_test(item, not)),
CfgEntry::Not(sub, _) => contains_not_test(sub, !not),
CfgEntry::NameValue { name: sym::test, .. } => not,
_ => false,
}
}