| //@ compile-flags: --crate-type=lib |
| //@ check-pass |
| //@ edition: 2024 |
| #![feature(const_raw_ptr_comparison)] |
| #![feature(fn_align)] |
| // Generally: |
| // For any `Some` return, `None` would also be valid, unless otherwise noted. |
| // For any `None` return, only `None` is valid, unless otherwise noted. |
| |
| macro_rules! do_test { |
| ($a:expr, $b:expr, $expected:pat) => { |
| const _: () = { |
| let a: *const _ = $a; |
| let b: *const _ = $b; |
| assert!(matches!(<*const u8>::guaranteed_eq(a.cast(), b.cast()), $expected)); |
| }; |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| #[repr(align(2))] |
| struct T(#[allow(unused)] u16); |
| |
| #[repr(align(2))] |
| struct AlignedZst; |
| |
| static A: T = T(42); |
| static B: T = T(42); |
| static mut MUT_STATIC: T = T(42); |
| static ZST: () = (); |
| static ALIGNED_ZST: AlignedZst = AlignedZst; |
| static LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED: [usize; 2] = [0, 1]; |
| static mut MUT_LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED: [usize; 2] = [0, 1]; |
| |
| const FN_PTR: *const () = { |
| fn foo() {} |
| unsafe { std::mem::transmute(foo as fn()) } |
| }; |
| |
| const ALIGNED_FN_PTR: *const () = { |
| #[rustc_align(2)] |
| fn aligned_foo() {} |
| unsafe { std::mem::transmute(aligned_foo as fn()) } |
| }; |
| |
| trait Trait { |
| #[allow(unused)] |
| fn method(&self) -> u8; |
| } |
| impl Trait for u32 { |
| fn method(&self) -> u8 { 1 } |
| } |
| impl Trait for i32 { |
| fn method(&self) -> u8 { 2 } |
| } |
| |
| const VTABLE_PTR_1: *const () = { |
| let [_data, vtable] = unsafe { |
| std::mem::transmute::<&dyn Trait, [*const (); 2]>(&42_u32 as &dyn Trait) |
| }; |
| vtable |
| }; |
| const VTABLE_PTR_2: *const () = { |
| let [_data, vtable] = unsafe { |
| std::mem::transmute::<&dyn Trait, [*const (); 2]>(&42_i32 as &dyn Trait) |
| }; |
| vtable |
| }; |
| |
| // Cannot be `None`: `is_null` is stable with strong guarantees about integer-valued pointers. |
| do_test!(0 as *const u8, 0 as *const u8, Some(true)); |
| do_test!(0 as *const u8, 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| |
| // Integer-valued pointers can always be compared. |
| do_test!(1 as *const u8, 1 as *const u8, Some(true)); |
| do_test!(1 as *const u8, 2 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| |
| // Cannot be `None`: `static`s' addresses, references, (and within and one-past-the-end of those), |
| // and `fn` pointers cannot be null, and `is_null` is stable with strong guarantees, and |
| // `is_null` is implemented using `guaranteed_cmp`. |
| do_test!(&A, 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).cast::<u8>().wrapping_add(1), 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_add(1), 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&ZST, 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&(), 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(const { &() }, 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(FN_PTR, 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| |
| // This pointer is out-of-bounds, but still cannot be equal to 0 because of alignment. |
| do_test!((&raw const A).cast::<u8>().wrapping_add(size_of::<T>() + 1), 0 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| |
| // aside from 0, these pointers might end up pretty much anywhere. |
| do_test!(&A, align_of::<T>() as *const u8, None); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(1), (align_of::<T>() + 1) as *const u8, None); |
| |
| // except that they must still be aligned |
| do_test!(&A, 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(1), align_of::<T>() as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| |
| // If `ptr.wrapping_sub(int)` cannot be null (because it is in-bounds or one-past-the-end of |
| // `ptr`'s allocation, or because it is misaligned from `ptr`'s allocation), then we know that |
| // `ptr != int`, even if `ptr` itself is out-of-bounds or one-past-the-end of its allocation. |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(1), 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(2), 2 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(3), 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const ZST).wrapping_byte_add(1), 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(VTABLE_PTR_1.wrapping_byte_add(1), 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(FN_PTR.wrapping_byte_add(1), 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, size_of::<T>().wrapping_neg() as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED, size_of::<usize>().wrapping_neg() as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| // (`ptr - int != 0` due to misalignment) |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(2), 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const ALIGNED_ZST).wrapping_byte_add(2), 1 as *const u8, Some(false)); |
| |
| // When pointers go out-of-bounds, they *might* become null, so these comparions cannot work. |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_add(2), 0 as *const u8, None); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_sub(1), 0 as *const u8, None); |
| |
| // Statics cannot be duplicated |
| do_test!(&A, &A, Some(true)); |
| |
| // Two non-ZST statics cannot have the same address |
| do_test!(&A, &B, Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, &raw const MUT_STATIC, Some(false)); |
| |
| // One-past-the-end of one static can be equal to the address of another static. |
| do_test!(&A, (&raw const B).wrapping_add(1), None); |
| |
| // Cannot know if ZST static is at the same address with anything non-null (if alignment allows). |
| do_test!(&A, &ZST, None); |
| do_test!(&A, &ALIGNED_ZST, None); |
| |
| // Unclear if ZST statics can be placed "in the middle of" non-ZST statics. |
| // For now, we conservatively say they could, and return None here. |
| do_test!(&ZST, (&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(1), None); |
| |
| // As per https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/items/static-items.html#r-items.static.storage-disjointness |
| // immutable statics are allowed to overlap with const items and promoteds. |
| do_test!(&A, &T(42), None); |
| do_test!(&A, const { &T(42) }, None); |
| do_test!(&A, { const X: T = T(42); &X }, None); |
| |
| // These could return Some(false), since only immutable statics can overlap with const items |
| // and promoteds. |
| do_test!(&raw const MUT_STATIC, &T(42), None); |
| do_test!(&raw const MUT_STATIC, const { &T(42) }, None); |
| do_test!(&raw const MUT_STATIC, { const X: T = T(42); &X }, None); |
| |
| // An odd offset from a 2-aligned allocation can never be equal to an even offset from a |
| // 2-aligned allocation, even if the offsets are out-of-bounds. |
| do_test!(&A, (&raw const B).wrapping_byte_add(1), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, (&raw const B).wrapping_byte_add(5), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, (&raw const ALIGNED_ZST).wrapping_byte_add(1), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&ALIGNED_ZST, (&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(1), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, (&T(42) as *const T).wrapping_byte_add(1), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, (const { &T(42) } as *const T).wrapping_byte_add(1), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, ({ const X: T = T(42); &X } as *const T).wrapping_byte_add(1), Some(false)); |
| |
| // We could return `Some(false)` for these, as pointers to different statics can never be equal if |
| // that would require the statics to overlap, even if the pointers themselves are offset out of |
| // bounds or one-past-the-end. We currently only check strictly in-bounds pointers when comparing |
| // pointers to different statics, however. |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_add(1), (&raw const B).wrapping_add(1), None); |
| do_test!( |
| (&raw const LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED).cast::<usize>().wrapping_add(2), |
| (&raw const MUT_LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED).cast::<usize>().wrapping_add(1), |
| None |
| ); |
| |
| // Pointers into the same static are equal if and only if their offset is the same, |
| // even if either is out-of-bounds. |
| do_test!(&A, &A, Some(true)); |
| do_test!(&A, &A.0, Some(true)); |
| do_test!(&A, (&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(1), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, (&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(2), Some(false)); |
| do_test!(&A, (&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(51), Some(false)); |
| do_test!((&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(51), (&raw const A).wrapping_byte_add(51), Some(true)); |
| |
| // Pointers to the same fn may be unequal, since `fn`s can be duplicated. |
| do_test!(FN_PTR, FN_PTR, None); |
| do_test!(ALIGNED_FN_PTR, ALIGNED_FN_PTR, None); |
| |
| // Pointers to different fns may be equal, since `fn`s can be deduplicated. |
| do_test!(FN_PTR, ALIGNED_FN_PTR, None); |
| |
| // Pointers to the same vtable may be unequal, since vtables can be duplicated. |
| do_test!(VTABLE_PTR_1, VTABLE_PTR_1, None); |
| |
| // Pointers to different vtables may be equal, since vtables can be deduplicated. |
| do_test!(VTABLE_PTR_1, VTABLE_PTR_2, None); |
| |
| // Function pointers to aligned function allocations are not necessarily actually aligned, |
| // due to platform-specific semantics. |
| // See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144661 |
| // FIXME: This could return `Some` on platforms where function pointers' addresses actually |
| // correspond to function addresses including alignment, or on platforms where all functions |
| // are aligned to some amount (e.g. ARM where a32 function pointers are at least 4-aligned, |
| // and t32 function pointers are 2-aligned-offset-by-1). |
| do_test!(ALIGNED_FN_PTR, ALIGNED_FN_PTR.wrapping_byte_offset(1), None); |
| |
| // Conservatively say we don't know. |
| do_test!(FN_PTR, VTABLE_PTR_1, None); |
| do_test!((&raw const LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED).cast::<usize>().wrapping_add(1), VTABLE_PTR_1, None); |
| do_test!((&raw const MUT_LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED).cast::<usize>().wrapping_add(1), VTABLE_PTR_1, None); |
| do_test!((&raw const LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED).cast::<usize>().wrapping_add(1), FN_PTR, None); |
| do_test!((&raw const MUT_LARGE_WORD_ALIGNED).cast::<usize>().wrapping_add(1), FN_PTR, None); |