| /* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ |
| /* origin: musl src/math/ceilf.c */ |
| |
| //! Generic `ceil` algorithm. |
| //! |
| //! Note that this uses the algorithm from musl's `ceilf` rather than `ceil` or `ceill` because |
| //! performance seems to be better (based on icount) and it does not seem to experience rounding |
| //! errors on i386. |
| |
| use crate::support::{Float, FpResult, Int, IntTy, MinInt, Status}; |
| |
| #[inline] |
| pub fn ceil<F: Float>(x: F) -> F { |
| ceil_status(x).val |
| } |
| |
| #[inline] |
| pub fn ceil_status<F: Float>(x: F) -> FpResult<F> { |
| let zero = IntTy::<F>::ZERO; |
| |
| let mut ix = x.to_bits(); |
| let e = x.exp_unbiased(); |
| |
| // If the represented value has no fractional part, no truncation is needed. |
| if e >= F::SIG_BITS as i32 { |
| return FpResult::ok(x); |
| } |
| |
| let status; |
| let res = if e >= 0 { |
| // |x| >= 1.0 |
| let m = F::SIG_MASK >> e.unsigned(); |
| if (ix & m) == zero { |
| // Portion to be masked is already zero; no adjustment needed. |
| return FpResult::ok(x); |
| } |
| |
| // Otherwise, raise an inexact exception. |
| status = Status::INEXACT; |
| |
| if x.is_sign_positive() { |
| ix += m; |
| } |
| |
| ix &= !m; |
| F::from_bits(ix) |
| } else { |
| // |x| < 1.0, raise an inexact exception since truncation will happen (unless x == 0). |
| if ix & F::SIG_MASK == F::Int::ZERO { |
| status = Status::OK; |
| } else { |
| status = Status::INEXACT; |
| } |
| |
| if x.is_sign_negative() { |
| // -1.0 < x <= -0.0; rounding up goes toward -0.0. |
| F::NEG_ZERO |
| } else if ix << 1 != zero { |
| // 0.0 < x < 1.0; rounding up goes toward +1.0. |
| F::ONE |
| } else { |
| // +0.0 remains unchanged |
| x |
| } |
| }; |
| |
| FpResult::new(res, status) |
| } |
| |
| #[cfg(test)] |
| mod tests { |
| use super::*; |
| use crate::support::Hexf; |
| |
| /// Test against https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/math/ceil |
| fn spec_test<F: Float>(cases: &[(F, F, Status)]) { |
| let roundtrip = [ |
| F::ZERO, |
| F::ONE, |
| F::NEG_ONE, |
| F::NEG_ZERO, |
| F::INFINITY, |
| F::NEG_INFINITY, |
| ]; |
| |
| for x in roundtrip { |
| let FpResult { val, status } = ceil_status(x); |
| assert_biteq!(val, x, "{}", Hexf(x)); |
| assert_eq!(status, Status::OK, "{}", Hexf(x)); |
| } |
| |
| for &(x, res, res_stat) in cases { |
| let FpResult { val, status } = ceil_status(x); |
| assert_biteq!(val, res, "{}", Hexf(x)); |
| assert_eq!(status, res_stat, "{}", Hexf(x)); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /* Skipping f16 / f128 "sanity_check"s due to rejected literal lexing at MSRV */ |
| |
| #[test] |
| #[cfg(f16_enabled)] |
| fn spec_tests_f16() { |
| let cases = [ |
| (0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| ]; |
| spec_test::<f16>(&cases); |
| } |
| |
| #[test] |
| fn sanity_check_f32() { |
| assert_eq!(ceil(1.1f32), 2.0); |
| assert_eq!(ceil(2.9f32), 3.0); |
| } |
| |
| #[test] |
| fn spec_tests_f32() { |
| let cases = [ |
| (0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| ]; |
| spec_test::<f32>(&cases); |
| } |
| |
| #[test] |
| fn sanity_check_f64() { |
| assert_eq!(ceil(1.1f64), 2.0); |
| assert_eq!(ceil(2.9f64), 3.0); |
| } |
| |
| #[test] |
| fn spec_tests_f64() { |
| let cases = [ |
| (0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| ]; |
| spec_test::<f64>(&cases); |
| } |
| |
| #[test] |
| #[cfg(f128_enabled)] |
| fn spec_tests_f128() { |
| let cases = [ |
| (0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| (-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT), |
| ]; |
| spec_test::<f128>(&cases); |
| } |
| } |