| use rustc_infer::infer::TyCtxtInferExt; |
| use rustc_middle::query::Providers; |
| use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution; |
| use rustc_middle::ty::{self, PseudoCanonicalInput, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitableExt}; |
| use rustc_trait_selection::traits::query::normalize::QueryNormalizeExt; |
| use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{Normalized, ObligationCause}; |
| use tracing::debug; |
| |
| pub(crate) fn provide(p: &mut Providers) { |
| *p = Providers { |
| try_normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions: |tcx, goal| { |
| debug!("try_normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions(goal={:#?}", goal); |
| |
| try_normalize_after_erasing_regions(tcx, goal) |
| }, |
| ..*p |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| fn try_normalize_after_erasing_regions<'tcx, T: TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> + PartialEq + Copy>( |
| tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, |
| goal: PseudoCanonicalInput<'tcx, T>, |
| ) -> Result<T, NoSolution> { |
| let PseudoCanonicalInput { typing_env, value } = goal; |
| let (infcx, param_env) = tcx.infer_ctxt().build_with_typing_env(typing_env); |
| let cause = ObligationCause::dummy(); |
| match infcx.at(&cause, param_env).query_normalize(value) { |
| Ok(Normalized { value: normalized_value, obligations: normalized_obligations }) => { |
| // We don't care about the `obligations`; they are |
| // always only region relations, and we are about to |
| // erase those anyway: |
| // This has been seen to fail in RL, so making it a non-debug assertion to better catch |
| // those cases. |
| assert_eq!( |
| normalized_obligations.iter().find(|p| not_outlives_predicate(p.predicate)), |
| None, |
| ); |
| |
| let resolved_value = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_value); |
| // It's unclear when `resolve_vars` would have an effect in a |
| // fresh `InferCtxt`. If this assert does trigger, it will give |
| // us a test case. |
| debug_assert_eq!(normalized_value, resolved_value); |
| let erased = infcx.tcx.erase_and_anonymize_regions(resolved_value); |
| debug_assert!(!erased.has_infer(), "{erased:?}"); |
| Ok(erased) |
| } |
| Err(NoSolution) => Err(NoSolution), |
| } |
| } |
| |
| fn not_outlives_predicate(p: ty::Predicate<'_>) -> bool { |
| match p.kind().skip_binder() { |
| ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::RegionOutlives(..)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::TypeOutlives(..)) => false, |
| ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Trait(..)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Projection(..)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::HostEffect(..)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(..)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::UnstableFeature(_)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(..) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(..) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(..)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::DynCompatible(..) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Subtype(..) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Coerce(..) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstEvaluatable(..)) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::ConstEquate(..) |
| | ty::PredicateKind::Ambiguous => true, |
| } |
| } |