| error[E0063]: missing field `present` in initializer of `Foo` | |
| --> $DIR/struct-field-cfg.rs:7:13 | |
| | | |
| LL | let _ = Foo { #[cfg(false)] present: () }; | |
| | ^^^ missing `present` | |
| error[E0560]: struct `Foo` has no field named `absent` | |
| --> $DIR/struct-field-cfg.rs:10:45 | |
| | | |
| LL | let _ = Foo { present: (), #[cfg(true)] absent: () }; | |
| | ^^^^^^ `Foo` does not have this field | |
| | | |
| = note: all struct fields are already assigned | |
| error[E0027]: pattern does not mention field `present` | |
| --> $DIR/struct-field-cfg.rs:13:9 | |
| | | |
| LL | let Foo { #[cfg(false)] present: () } = foo; | |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing field `present` | |
| | | |
| help: include the missing field in the pattern | |
| | | |
| LL - let Foo { #[cfg(false)] present: () } = foo; | |
| LL + let Foo { present } = foo; | |
| | | |
| help: if you don't care about this missing field, you can explicitly ignore it | |
| | | |
| LL - let Foo { #[cfg(false)] present: () } = foo; | |
| LL + let Foo { present: _ } = foo; | |
| | | |
| help: or always ignore missing fields here | |
| | | |
| LL - let Foo { #[cfg(false)] present: () } = foo; | |
| LL + let Foo { .. } = foo; | |
| | | |
| error[E0026]: struct `Foo` does not have a field named `absent` | |
| --> $DIR/struct-field-cfg.rs:16:41 | |
| | | |
| LL | let Foo { present: (), #[cfg(true)] absent: () } = foo; | |
| | ^^^^^^ struct `Foo` does not have this field | |
| error: aborting due to 4 previous errors | |
| Some errors have detailed explanations: E0026, E0027, E0063, E0560. | |
| For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0026`. |