| //! Circa 2016-06-05, `fn inline` below issued an |
| //! erroneous warning from the elaborate_drops pass about moving out of |
| //! a field in `Foo`, which has a destructor (and thus cannot have |
| //! content moved out of it). The reason that the warning is erroneous |
| //! in this case is that we are doing a *replace*, not a move, of the |
| //! content in question, and it is okay to replace fields within `Foo`. |
| //! |
| //! Another more subtle problem was that the elaborate_drops was |
| //! creating a separate drop flag for that internally replaced content, |
| //! even though the compiler should enforce an invariant that any drop |
| //! flag for such subcontent of `Foo` will always have the same value |
| //! as the drop flag for `Foo` itself. |
| //! |
| //! Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34101>. |
| |
| //@ check-pass |
| |
| struct Foo(String); |
| |
| impl Drop for Foo { |
| fn drop(&mut self) {} |
| } |
| |
| fn test_inline_replacement() { |
| // dummy variable so `f` gets assigned `var1` in MIR for both functions |
| let _s = (); |
| let mut f = Foo(String::from("foo")); |
| f.0 = String::from("bar"); // This should not warn |
| } |
| |
| fn test_outline_replacement() { |
| let _s = String::from("foo"); |
| let mut f = Foo(_s); |
| f.0 = String::from("bar"); // This should not warn either |
| } |
| |
| fn main() { |
| test_inline_replacement(); |
| test_outline_replacement(); |
| } |