| use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then; |
| use clippy_utils::sym; |
| use clippy_utils::visitors::is_const_evaluatable; |
| use rustc_ast::ast::LitKind; |
| use rustc_errors::Applicability; |
| use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind}; |
| use rustc_lint::LateContext; |
| use rustc_span::Span; |
| |
| use super::STR_SPLIT_AT_NEWLINE; |
| |
| pub(super) fn check<'a>( |
| cx: &LateContext<'a>, |
| expr: &'_ Expr<'_>, |
| split_recv: &'a Expr<'_>, |
| split_span: Span, |
| split_arg: &'_ Expr<'_>, |
| ) { |
| // We're looking for `A.trim().split(B)`, where the adjusted type of `A` is `&str` (e.g. an |
| // expression returning `String`), and `B` is a `Pattern` that hard-codes a newline (either `"\n"` |
| // or `"\r\n"`). There are a lot of ways to specify a pattern, and this lint only checks the most |
| // basic ones: a `'\n'`, `"\n"`, and `"\r\n"`. |
| if let ExprKind::MethodCall(trim_method_name, trim_recv, [], trim_span) = split_recv.kind |
| && trim_method_name.ident.name == sym::trim |
| && cx.typeck_results().expr_ty_adjusted(trim_recv).peel_refs().is_str() |
| && !is_const_evaluatable(cx, trim_recv) |
| && let ExprKind::Lit(split_lit) = split_arg.kind |
| && matches!( |
| split_lit.node, |
| LitKind::Char('\n') | LitKind::Str(sym::LF | sym::CRLF, _) |
| ) |
| { |
| span_lint_and_then( |
| cx, |
| STR_SPLIT_AT_NEWLINE, |
| expr.span, |
| "using `str.trim().split()` with hard-coded newlines", |
| |diag| { |
| diag.span_suggestion_verbose( |
| trim_span.to(split_span), // combine the call spans of the two methods |
| "use `str.lines()` instead", |
| "lines()", |
| Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, |
| ); |
| }, |
| ); |
| } |
| } |