| //! Test for inner statics with the same name. | |
| //! | |
| //! Before, the path name for all items defined in methods of traits and impls never | |
| //! took into account the name of the method. This meant that if you had two statics | |
| //! of the same name in two different methods the statics would end up having the | |
| //! same symbol named (even after mangling) because the path components leading to | |
| //! the symbol were exactly the same (just __extensions__ and the static name). | |
| //! | |
| //! It turns out that if you add the symbol "A" twice to LLVM, it automatically | |
| //! makes the second one "A1" instead of "A". What this meant is that in local crate | |
| //! compilations we never found this bug. Even across crates, this was never a | |
| //! problem. The problem arises when you have generic methods that don't get | |
| //! generated at compile-time of a library. If the statics were re-added to LLVM by | |
| //! a client crate of a library in a different order, you would reference different | |
| //! constants (the integer suffixes wouldn't be guaranteed to be the same). | |
| //@ run-pass | |
| //@ aux-build:inner_static.rs | |
| extern crate inner_static; | |
| pub fn main() { | |
| let a = inner_static::A::<()> { v: () }; | |
| let b = inner_static::B::<()> { v: () }; | |
| let c = inner_static::test::A::<()> { v: () }; | |
| assert_eq!(a.bar(), 2); | |
| assert_eq!(b.bar(), 4); | |
| assert_eq!(c.bar(), 6); | |
| } |