| //@ run-pass |
| //! Test drop order for different ways of declaring pattern bindings involving or-patterns. |
| //! In particular, are ordered based on the order in which the first occurrence of each binding |
| //! appears (i.e. the "primary" bindings). Regression test for #142163. |
| |
| use std::cell::RefCell; |
| use std::ops::Drop; |
| |
| // For more informative failures, we collect drops in a `Vec` before checking their order. |
| struct DropOrder(RefCell<Vec<u32>>); |
| struct LogDrop<'o>(&'o DropOrder, u32); |
| |
| impl<'o> Drop for LogDrop<'o> { |
| fn drop(&mut self) { |
| self.0.0.borrow_mut().push(self.1); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| #[track_caller] |
| fn assert_drop_order(expected_drops: impl IntoIterator<Item = u32>, f: impl Fn(&DropOrder)) { |
| let order = DropOrder(RefCell::new(Vec::new())); |
| f(&order); |
| let order = order.0.into_inner(); |
| let correct_order: Vec<u32> = expected_drops.into_iter().collect(); |
| assert_eq!(order, correct_order); |
| } |
| |
| #[expect(unused_variables, unused_assignments, irrefutable_let_patterns)] |
| fn main() { |
| // When bindings are declared with `let pat;`, they're visited in left-to-right order, using the |
| // order given by the first occurrence of each variable. They're later dropped in reverse. |
| assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| // Drops are right-to-left: `z`, `y`, `x`. |
| let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z); |
| // Assignment order doesn't matter. |
| z = LogDrop(o, 1); |
| y = LogDrop(o, 2); |
| x = LogDrop(o, 3); |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| // The first or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `y`, `x`. |
| let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)); |
| x = LogDrop(o, 2); |
| y = LogDrop(o, 1); |
| }); |
| |
| // `let pat = expr;` should have the same drop order. |
| assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| // Drops are right-to-left: `z`, `y`, `x`. |
| let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) = (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 2)), LogDrop(o, 1)); |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| // The first or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `y`, `x`. |
| let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)) = (true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)); |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| // That drop order is used regardless of which or-pattern alternative matches: `y`, `x`. |
| let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)) = (false, LogDrop(o, 1), LogDrop(o, 2)); |
| }); |
| |
| // `match` should have the same drop order. |
| assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| // Drops are right-to-left: `z`, `y` `x`. |
| match (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 2)), LogDrop(o, 1)) { (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) => {} } |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| // The first or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `y`, `x`. |
| match (true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)) { (true, x, y) | (false, y, x) => {} } |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| // That drop order is used regardless of which or-pattern alternative matches: `y`, `x`. |
| match (false, LogDrop(o, 1), LogDrop(o, 2)) { (true, x, y) | (false, y, x) => {} } |
| }); |
| |
| // Function params are visited one-by-one, and the order of bindings within a param's pattern is |
| // the same as `let pat = expr;` |
| assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| // Among separate params, the drop order is right-to-left: `z`, `y`, `x`. |
| (|x, (Ok(y) | Err(y)), z| {})(LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 2)), LogDrop(o, 1)); |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| // Within a param's pattern, likewise: `z`, `y`, `x`. |
| (|(x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z)| {})((LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 2)), LogDrop(o, 1))); |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| // The first or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `y`, `x`. |
| (|((true, x, y) | (false, y, x))| {})((true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1))); |
| }); |
| |
| // `if let` and `let`-`else` see bindings in the same order as `let pat = expr;`. |
| assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| if let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) = (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 2)), LogDrop(o, 1)) {} |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) = (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 2)), LogDrop(o, 1)) else { |
| unreachable!(); |
| }; |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| if let (true, x, y) | (false, y, x) = (true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)) {} |
| }); |
| assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)) = (true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)) else { |
| unreachable!(); |
| }; |
| }); |
| |
| // Test nested and adjacent or-patterns, including or-patterns without bindings under a guard. |
| assert_drop_order(1..=6, |o| { |
| // The `LogDrop`s that aren't moved into bindings are dropped last. |
| match [ |
| [LogDrop(o, 6), LogDrop(o, 4)], |
| [LogDrop(o, 3), LogDrop(o, 2)], |
| [LogDrop(o, 1), LogDrop(o, 5)], |
| ] { |
| [ |
| [_ | _, w | w] | [w | w, _ | _], |
| [x | x, y | y] | [y | y, x | x], |
| [z | z, _ | _] | [_ | _, z | z], |
| ] if true => {} |
| _ => unreachable!(), |
| } |
| }); |
| } |