| use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then; |
| use clippy_utils::macros::{is_panic, root_macro_call}; |
| use clippy_utils::source::{indent_of, reindent_multiline}; |
| use clippy_utils::{higher, is_else_clause, is_parent_stmt, peel_blocks_with_stmt, span_extract_comment, sugg}; |
| use rustc_errors::Applicability; |
| use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind}; |
| use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintContext}; |
| use rustc_session::declare_lint_pass; |
| |
| declare_clippy_lint! { |
| /// ### What it does |
| /// Detects `if`-then-`panic!` that can be replaced with `assert!`. |
| /// |
| /// ### Why is this bad? |
| /// `assert!` is simpler than `if`-then-`panic!`. |
| /// |
| /// ### Example |
| /// ```no_run |
| /// let sad_people: Vec<&str> = vec![]; |
| /// if !sad_people.is_empty() { |
| /// panic!("there are sad people: {:?}", sad_people); |
| /// } |
| /// ``` |
| /// Use instead: |
| /// ```no_run |
| /// let sad_people: Vec<&str> = vec![]; |
| /// assert!(sad_people.is_empty(), "there are sad people: {:?}", sad_people); |
| /// ``` |
| #[clippy::version = "1.57.0"] |
| pub MANUAL_ASSERT, |
| pedantic, |
| "`panic!` and only a `panic!` in `if`-then statement" |
| } |
| |
| declare_lint_pass!(ManualAssert => [MANUAL_ASSERT]); |
| |
| impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for ManualAssert { |
| fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &Expr<'tcx>) { |
| if let Some(higher::If { cond, then, r#else: None }) = higher::If::hir(expr) |
| && !matches!(cond.kind, ExprKind::Let(_)) |
| && !expr.span.from_expansion() |
| && let then = peel_blocks_with_stmt(then) |
| && let Some(macro_call) = root_macro_call(then.span) |
| && is_panic(cx, macro_call.def_id) |
| && !cx.tcx.sess.source_map().is_multiline(cond.span) |
| && let Ok(panic_snippet) = cx.sess().source_map().span_to_snippet(macro_call.span) |
| && let Some(panic_snippet) = panic_snippet.strip_suffix(')') |
| && let Some((_, format_args_snip)) = panic_snippet.split_once('(') |
| // Don't change `else if foo { panic!(..) }` to `else { assert!(foo, ..) }` as it just |
| // shuffles the condition around. |
| // Should this have a config value? |
| && !is_else_clause(cx.tcx, expr) |
| { |
| span_lint_and_then( |
| cx, |
| MANUAL_ASSERT, |
| expr.span, |
| "only a `panic!` in `if`-then statement", |
| |diag| { |
| let mut applicability = Applicability::MachineApplicable; |
| let mut comments = span_extract_comment(cx.sess().source_map(), expr.span); |
| if !comments.is_empty() { |
| comments += "\n"; |
| } |
| let cond_sugg = !sugg::Sugg::hir_with_context(cx, cond, expr.span.ctxt(), "..", &mut applicability); |
| let semicolon = if is_parent_stmt(cx, expr.hir_id) { ";" } else { "" }; |
| |
| let indent = indent_of(cx, expr.span); |
| let full_sugg = reindent_multiline( |
| format!("{comments}assert!({cond_sugg}, {format_args_snip}){semicolon}").as_str(), |
| true, |
| indent, |
| ); |
| diag.span_suggestion_verbose( |
| expr.span, |
| "replace `if`-then-`panic!` with `assert!`", |
| full_sugg, |
| applicability, |
| ); |
| }, |
| ); |
| } |
| } |
| } |