| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:27:17 |
| | |
| 27 | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]` |
| | |
| = note: `-D get-unwrap` implied by `-D warnings` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:28:17 |
| | |
| 28 | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:29:17 |
| | |
| 29 | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:30:17 |
| | |
| 30 | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:31:17 |
| | |
| 31 | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:32:17 |
| | |
| 32 | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]` |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:10 |
| | |
| 37 | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut boxed_slice[0]` |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:10 |
| | |
| 38 | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_slice[0]` |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:10 |
| | |
| 39 | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vec[0]` |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:10 |
| | |
| 40 | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vecdeque[0]` |
| |