| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:8:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 2f32.powf(x); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp2()` |
| | |
| = note: `-D clippy::suboptimal-flops` implied by `-D warnings` |
| = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::suboptimal_flops)]` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:10:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 2f32.powf(3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f32.exp2()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:12:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 2f32.powf(-3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f32).exp2()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:14:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = std::f32::consts::E.powf(x); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:16:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = std::f32::consts::E.powf(3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f32.exp()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:18:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = std::f32::consts::E.powf(-3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f32).exp()` |
| |
| error: square-root of a number can be computed more efficiently and accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:20:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 2.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.sqrt()` |
| |
| error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:22:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.cbrt()` |
| | |
| = note: `-D clippy::imprecise-flops` implied by `-D warnings` |
| = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::imprecise_flops)]` |
| |
| error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:24:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = (x as f32).powf(1.0 / 3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x as f32).cbrt()` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:26:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:28:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(-2.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:30:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(16_777_215.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(16_777_215)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:32:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(-16_777_215.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-16_777_215)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:34:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = (x as f32).powf(-16_777_215.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x as f32).powi(-16_777_215)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:36:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = (x as f32).powf(3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x as f32).powi(3)` |
| |
| error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:38:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = (1.5_f32 + 1.0).powf(1.0 / 3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(1.5_f32 + 1.0).cbrt()` |
| |
| error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:40:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 1.5_f64.powf(1.0 / 3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `1.5_f64.cbrt()` |
| |
| error: square-root of a number can be computed more efficiently and accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:42:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 1.5_f64.powf(1.0 / 2.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `1.5_f64.sqrt()` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:44:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 1.5_f64.powf(3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `1.5_f64.powi(3)` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:53:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 2f32.powf(1f32 + m!(2.0)); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(1f32 + m!(2.0)).exp2()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:63:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 2f64.powf(x); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp2()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:65:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 2f64.powf(3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f64.exp2()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:67:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = 2f64.powf(-3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f64).exp2()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:69:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(x); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:71:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f64.exp()` |
| |
| error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:73:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(-3.1); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f64).exp()` |
| |
| error: square-root of a number can be computed more efficiently and accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:75:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 2.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.sqrt()` |
| |
| error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:77:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.cbrt()` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:79:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(3.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:81:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(-2.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:83:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(-2_147_483_648.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2_147_483_648)` |
| |
| error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently |
| --> tests/ui/floating_point_powf.rs:85:13 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = x.powf(2_147_483_647.0); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(2_147_483_647)` |
| |
| error: aborting due to 32 previous errors |
| |