blob: bac4b3d32f2a5bbb934eb9bcf1a5275763332c57 [file] [log] [blame]
use clippy_config::Conf;
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
use clippy_utils::higher::If;
use clippy_utils::msrvs::{self, Msrv};
use clippy_utils::source::HasSession as _;
use clippy_utils::sugg::Sugg;
use clippy_utils::ty::is_type_diagnostic_item;
use clippy_utils::{eq_expr_value, peel_blocks, span_contains_comment};
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use rustc_hir::{BinOpKind, Expr, ExprKind};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty};
use rustc_session::impl_lint_pass;
use rustc_span::sym;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Detects patterns like `if a > b { a - b } else { b - a }` and suggests using `a.abs_diff(b)`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Using `abs_diff` is shorter, more readable, and avoids control flow.
///
/// ### Examples
/// ```no_run
/// # let (a, b) = (5_usize, 3_usize);
/// if a > b {
/// a - b
/// } else {
/// b - a
/// }
/// # ;
/// ```
/// Use instead:
/// ```no_run
/// # let (a, b) = (5_usize, 3_usize);
/// a.abs_diff(b)
/// # ;
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.88.0"]
pub MANUAL_ABS_DIFF,
complexity,
"using an if-else pattern instead of `abs_diff`"
}
impl_lint_pass!(ManualAbsDiff => [MANUAL_ABS_DIFF]);
pub struct ManualAbsDiff {
msrv: Msrv,
}
impl ManualAbsDiff {
pub fn new(conf: &'static Conf) -> Self {
Self { msrv: conf.msrv }
}
}
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for ManualAbsDiff {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'tcx>) {
if !expr.span.from_expansion()
&& let Some(if_expr) = If::hir(expr)
&& let Some(r#else) = if_expr.r#else
&& let ExprKind::Binary(op, rhs, lhs) = if_expr.cond.kind
&& let (BinOpKind::Gt | BinOpKind::Ge, mut a, mut b) | (BinOpKind::Lt | BinOpKind::Le, mut b, mut a) =
(op.node, rhs, lhs)
&& let Some(ty) = self.are_ty_eligible(cx, a, b)
&& is_sub_expr(cx, if_expr.then, a, b, ty)
&& is_sub_expr(cx, r#else, b, a, ty)
{
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
MANUAL_ABS_DIFF,
expr.span,
"manual absolute difference pattern without using `abs_diff`",
|diag| {
if is_unsuffixed_numeral_lit(a) && !is_unsuffixed_numeral_lit(b) {
(a, b) = (b, a);
}
let applicability = {
let source_map = cx.sess().source_map();
if span_contains_comment(source_map, if_expr.then.span)
|| span_contains_comment(source_map, r#else.span)
{
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect
} else {
Applicability::MachineApplicable
}
};
let sugg = format!(
"{}.abs_diff({})",
Sugg::hir(cx, a, "..").maybe_paren(),
Sugg::hir(cx, b, "..")
);
diag.span_suggestion(expr.span, "replace with `abs_diff`", sugg, applicability);
},
);
}
}
}
impl ManualAbsDiff {
/// Returns a type if `a` and `b` are both of it, and this lint can be applied to that
/// type (currently, any primitive int, or a `Duration`)
fn are_ty_eligible<'tcx>(&self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, a: &Expr<'_>, b: &Expr<'_>) -> Option<Ty<'tcx>> {
let is_int = |ty: Ty<'_>| matches!(ty.kind(), ty::Uint(_) | ty::Int(_)) && self.msrv.meets(cx, msrvs::ABS_DIFF);
let is_duration =
|ty| is_type_diagnostic_item(cx, ty, sym::Duration) && self.msrv.meets(cx, msrvs::DURATION_ABS_DIFF);
let a_ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(a).peel_refs();
(a_ty == cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(b).peel_refs() && (is_int(a_ty) || is_duration(a_ty))).then_some(a_ty)
}
}
/// Checks if the given expression is a subtraction operation between two expected expressions,
/// i.e. if `expr` is `{expected_a} - {expected_b}`.
///
/// If `expected_ty` is a signed primitive integer, this function will only return `Some` if the
/// subtraction expr is wrapped in a cast to the equivalent unsigned int.
fn is_sub_expr(
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
expr: &Expr<'_>,
expected_a: &Expr<'_>,
expected_b: &Expr<'_>,
expected_ty: Ty<'_>,
) -> bool {
let expr = peel_blocks(expr).kind;
if let ty::Int(ty) = expected_ty.kind() {
let unsigned = Ty::new_uint(cx.tcx, ty.to_unsigned());
return if let ExprKind::Cast(expr, cast_ty) = expr
&& cx.typeck_results().node_type(cast_ty.hir_id) == unsigned
{
is_sub_expr(cx, expr, expected_a, expected_b, unsigned)
} else {
false
};
}
if let ExprKind::Binary(op, a, b) = expr
&& let BinOpKind::Sub = op.node
&& eq_expr_value(cx, a, expected_a)
&& eq_expr_value(cx, b, expected_b)
{
true
} else {
false
}
}
fn is_unsuffixed_numeral_lit(expr: &Expr<'_>) -> bool {
matches!(expr.kind, ExprKind::Lit(lit) if lit.node.is_numeric() && lit.node.is_unsuffixed())
}