blob: c743501da253ed06a8fb7305f080fc15e60be3e3 [file] [log] [blame]
use clippy_config::Conf;
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::{span_lint_and_sugg, span_lint_and_then};
use clippy_utils::msrvs::{self, Msrv};
use clippy_utils::sugg::{Sugg, make_binop};
use clippy_utils::{
SpanlessEq, eq_expr_value, higher, is_in_const_context, is_integer_literal, peel_blocks, peel_blocks_with_stmt, sym,
};
use rustc_ast::ast::LitKind;
use rustc_data_structures::packed::Pu128;
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use rustc_hir::{AssignOpKind, BinOp, BinOpKind, Expr, ExprKind, QPath};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_session::impl_lint_pass;
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for implicit saturating subtraction.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Simplicity and readability. Instead we can easily use an builtin function.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```no_run
/// # let end: u32 = 10;
/// # let start: u32 = 5;
/// let mut i: u32 = end - start;
///
/// if i != 0 {
/// i -= 1;
/// }
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```no_run
/// # let end: u32 = 10;
/// # let start: u32 = 5;
/// let mut i: u32 = end - start;
///
/// i = i.saturating_sub(1);
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.44.0"]
pub IMPLICIT_SATURATING_SUB,
style,
"Perform saturating subtraction instead of implicitly checking lower bound of data type"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for comparisons between integers, followed by subtracting the greater value from the
/// lower one.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// This could result in an underflow and is most likely not what the user wants. If this was
/// intended to be a saturated subtraction, consider using the `saturating_sub` method directly.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```no_run
/// let a = 12u32;
/// let b = 13u32;
///
/// let result = if a > b { b - a } else { 0 };
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```no_run
/// let a = 12u32;
/// let b = 13u32;
///
/// let result = a.saturating_sub(b);
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.83.0"]
pub INVERTED_SATURATING_SUB,
correctness,
"Check if a variable is smaller than another one and still subtract from it even if smaller"
}
pub struct ImplicitSaturatingSub {
msrv: Msrv,
}
impl_lint_pass!(ImplicitSaturatingSub => [IMPLICIT_SATURATING_SUB, INVERTED_SATURATING_SUB]);
impl ImplicitSaturatingSub {
pub fn new(conf: &'static Conf) -> Self {
Self { msrv: conf.msrv }
}
}
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for ImplicitSaturatingSub {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'tcx>) {
if expr.span.from_expansion() {
return;
}
if let Some(higher::If { cond, then, r#else: None }) = higher::If::hir(expr)
// Check if the conditional expression is a binary operation
&& let ExprKind::Binary(ref cond_op, cond_left, cond_right) = cond.kind
{
check_with_condition(cx, expr, cond_op.node, cond_left, cond_right, then);
} else if let Some(higher::If {
cond,
then: if_block,
r#else: Some(else_block),
}) = higher::If::hir(expr)
&& let ExprKind::Binary(ref cond_op, cond_left, cond_right) = cond.kind
{
check_manual_check(
cx, expr, cond_op, cond_left, cond_right, if_block, else_block, self.msrv,
);
}
}
}
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
fn check_manual_check<'tcx>(
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
expr: &Expr<'tcx>,
condition: &BinOp,
left_hand: &Expr<'tcx>,
right_hand: &Expr<'tcx>,
if_block: &Expr<'tcx>,
else_block: &Expr<'tcx>,
msrv: Msrv,
) {
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(left_hand);
if ty.is_numeric() && !ty.is_signed() {
match condition.node {
BinOpKind::Gt | BinOpKind::Ge => check_gt(
cx,
condition.span,
expr.span,
left_hand,
right_hand,
if_block,
else_block,
msrv,
matches!(
clippy_utils::get_parent_expr(cx, expr),
Some(Expr {
kind: ExprKind::If(..),
..
})
),
),
BinOpKind::Lt | BinOpKind::Le => check_gt(
cx,
condition.span,
expr.span,
right_hand,
left_hand,
if_block,
else_block,
msrv,
matches!(
clippy_utils::get_parent_expr(cx, expr),
Some(Expr {
kind: ExprKind::If(..),
..
})
),
),
_ => {},
}
}
}
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
fn check_gt(
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
condition_span: Span,
expr_span: Span,
big_expr: &Expr<'_>,
little_expr: &Expr<'_>,
if_block: &Expr<'_>,
else_block: &Expr<'_>,
msrv: Msrv,
is_composited: bool,
) {
if is_side_effect_free(cx, big_expr) && is_side_effect_free(cx, little_expr) {
check_subtraction(
cx,
condition_span,
expr_span,
big_expr,
little_expr,
if_block,
else_block,
msrv,
is_composited,
);
}
}
fn is_side_effect_free(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> bool {
eq_expr_value(cx, expr, expr)
}
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
fn check_subtraction(
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
condition_span: Span,
expr_span: Span,
big_expr: &Expr<'_>,
little_expr: &Expr<'_>,
if_block: &Expr<'_>,
else_block: &Expr<'_>,
msrv: Msrv,
is_composited: bool,
) {
let if_block = peel_blocks(if_block);
let else_block = peel_blocks(else_block);
if is_integer_literal(if_block, 0) {
// We need to check this case as well to prevent infinite recursion.
if is_integer_literal(else_block, 0) {
// Well, seems weird but who knows?
return;
}
// If the subtraction is done in the `else` block, then we need to also revert the two
// variables as it means that the check was reverted too.
check_subtraction(
cx,
condition_span,
expr_span,
little_expr,
big_expr,
else_block,
if_block,
msrv,
is_composited,
);
return;
}
if is_integer_literal(else_block, 0)
&& let ExprKind::Binary(op, left, right) = if_block.kind
&& let BinOpKind::Sub = op.node
{
if eq_expr_value(cx, left, big_expr) && eq_expr_value(cx, right, little_expr) {
// This part of the condition is voluntarily split from the one before to ensure that
// if `snippet_opt` fails, it won't try the next conditions.
if (!is_in_const_context(cx) || msrv.meets(cx, msrvs::SATURATING_SUB_CONST))
&& let Some(big_expr_sugg) = Sugg::hir_opt(cx, big_expr).map(Sugg::maybe_paren)
&& let Some(little_expr_sugg) = Sugg::hir_opt(cx, little_expr)
{
let sugg = format!(
"{}{big_expr_sugg}.saturating_sub({little_expr_sugg}){}",
if is_composited { "{ " } else { "" },
if is_composited { " }" } else { "" }
);
span_lint_and_sugg(
cx,
IMPLICIT_SATURATING_SUB,
expr_span,
"manual arithmetic check found",
"replace it with",
sugg,
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
);
}
} else if eq_expr_value(cx, left, little_expr)
&& eq_expr_value(cx, right, big_expr)
&& let Some(big_expr_sugg) = Sugg::hir_opt(cx, big_expr)
&& let Some(little_expr_sugg) = Sugg::hir_opt(cx, little_expr)
{
let sugg = make_binop(BinOpKind::Sub, &big_expr_sugg, &little_expr_sugg);
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
INVERTED_SATURATING_SUB,
condition_span,
"inverted arithmetic check before subtraction",
|diag| {
diag.span_note(
if_block.span,
format!("this subtraction underflows when `{little_expr_sugg} < {big_expr_sugg}`"),
);
diag.span_suggestion(
if_block.span,
"try replacing it with",
format!("{sugg}"),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
},
);
}
}
}
fn check_with_condition<'tcx>(
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
expr: &Expr<'tcx>,
cond_op: BinOpKind,
cond_left: &Expr<'tcx>,
cond_right: &Expr<'tcx>,
then: &Expr<'tcx>,
) {
// Ensure that the binary operator is >, !=, or <
if (BinOpKind::Ne == cond_op || BinOpKind::Gt == cond_op || BinOpKind::Lt == cond_op)
// Check if assign operation is done
&& let Some(target) = subtracts_one(cx, then)
// Extracting out the variable name
&& let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, ares_path)) = target.kind
{
// Handle symmetric conditions in the if statement
let (cond_var, cond_num_val) = if SpanlessEq::new(cx).eq_expr(cond_left, target) {
if BinOpKind::Gt == cond_op || BinOpKind::Ne == cond_op {
(cond_left, cond_right)
} else {
return;
}
} else if SpanlessEq::new(cx).eq_expr(cond_right, target) {
if BinOpKind::Lt == cond_op || BinOpKind::Ne == cond_op {
(cond_right, cond_left)
} else {
return;
}
} else {
return;
};
// Check if the variable in the condition statement is an integer
if !cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(cond_var).is_integral() {
return;
}
// Get the variable name
let var_name = ares_path.segments[0].ident.name;
match cond_num_val.kind {
ExprKind::Lit(cond_lit) => {
// Check if the constant is zero
if let LitKind::Int(Pu128(0), _) = cond_lit.node {
if cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(cond_left).is_signed() {
} else {
print_lint_and_sugg(cx, var_name, expr);
}
}
},
ExprKind::Path(QPath::TypeRelative(_, name)) => {
if name.ident.name == sym::MIN
&& let Some(const_id) = cx.typeck_results().type_dependent_def_id(cond_num_val.hir_id)
&& let Some(impl_id) = cx.tcx.impl_of_method(const_id)
&& let None = cx.tcx.impl_trait_ref(impl_id) // An inherent impl
&& cx.tcx.type_of(impl_id).instantiate_identity().is_integral()
{
print_lint_and_sugg(cx, var_name, expr);
}
},
ExprKind::Call(func, []) => {
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::TypeRelative(_, name)) = func.kind
&& name.ident.name == sym::min_value
&& let Some(func_id) = cx.typeck_results().type_dependent_def_id(func.hir_id)
&& let Some(impl_id) = cx.tcx.impl_of_method(func_id)
&& let None = cx.tcx.impl_trait_ref(impl_id) // An inherent impl
&& cx.tcx.type_of(impl_id).instantiate_identity().is_integral()
{
print_lint_and_sugg(cx, var_name, expr);
}
},
_ => (),
}
}
}
fn subtracts_one<'a>(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &'a Expr<'a>) -> Option<&'a Expr<'a>> {
match peel_blocks_with_stmt(expr).kind {
ExprKind::AssignOp(ref op1, target, value) => {
// Check if literal being subtracted is one
(AssignOpKind::SubAssign == op1.node && is_integer_literal(value, 1)).then_some(target)
},
ExprKind::Assign(target, value, _) => {
if let ExprKind::Binary(ref op1, left1, right1) = value.kind
&& BinOpKind::Sub == op1.node
&& SpanlessEq::new(cx).eq_expr(left1, target)
&& is_integer_literal(right1, 1)
{
Some(target)
} else {
None
}
},
_ => None,
}
}
fn print_lint_and_sugg(cx: &LateContext<'_>, var_name: Symbol, expr: &Expr<'_>) {
span_lint_and_sugg(
cx,
IMPLICIT_SATURATING_SUB,
expr.span,
"implicitly performing saturating subtraction",
"try",
format!("{var_name} = {var_name}.saturating_sub({});", '1'),
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
);
}