|  | //===- InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp - -------------------------------===// | 
|  | // | 
|  | //                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure | 
|  | // | 
|  | // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source | 
|  | // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. | 
|  | // | 
|  | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | 
|  | // | 
|  | // The InductiveRangeCheckElimination pass splits a loop's iteration space into | 
|  | // three disjoint ranges.  It does that in a way such that the loop running in | 
|  | // the middle loop provably does not need range checks. As an example, it will | 
|  | // convert | 
|  | // | 
|  | //   len = < known positive > | 
|  | //   for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { | 
|  | //     if (0 <= i && i < len) { | 
|  | //       do_something(); | 
|  | //     } else { | 
|  | //       throw_out_of_bounds(); | 
|  | //     } | 
|  | //   } | 
|  | // | 
|  | // to | 
|  | // | 
|  | //   len = < known positive > | 
|  | //   limit = smin(n, len) | 
|  | //   // no first segment | 
|  | //   for (i = 0; i < limit; i++) { | 
|  | //     if (0 <= i && i < len) { // this check is fully redundant | 
|  | //       do_something(); | 
|  | //     } else { | 
|  | //       throw_out_of_bounds(); | 
|  | //     } | 
|  | //   } | 
|  | //   for (i = limit; i < n; i++) { | 
|  | //     if (0 <= i && i < len) { | 
|  | //       do_something(); | 
|  | //     } else { | 
|  | //       throw_out_of_bounds(); | 
|  | //     } | 
|  | //   } | 
|  | // | 
|  | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | 
|  |  | 
|  | #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/None.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/ADT/Twine.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAnalysisManager.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/CFG.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Metadata.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Type.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Use.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/User.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/IR/Value.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Pass.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Support/BranchProbability.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Support/Casting.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h" | 
|  | #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.h" | 
|  | #include <algorithm> | 
|  | #include <cassert> | 
|  | #include <iterator> | 
|  | #include <limits> | 
|  | #include <utility> | 
|  | #include <vector> | 
|  |  | 
|  | using namespace llvm; | 
|  | using namespace llvm::PatternMatch; | 
|  |  | 
|  | static cl::opt<unsigned> LoopSizeCutoff("irce-loop-size-cutoff", cl::Hidden, | 
|  | cl::init(64)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | static cl::opt<bool> PrintChangedLoops("irce-print-changed-loops", cl::Hidden, | 
|  | cl::init(false)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | static cl::opt<bool> PrintRangeChecks("irce-print-range-checks", cl::Hidden, | 
|  | cl::init(false)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | static cl::opt<int> MaxExitProbReciprocal("irce-max-exit-prob-reciprocal", | 
|  | cl::Hidden, cl::init(10)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | static cl::opt<bool> SkipProfitabilityChecks("irce-skip-profitability-checks", | 
|  | cl::Hidden, cl::init(false)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | static cl::opt<bool> AllowUnsignedLatchCondition("irce-allow-unsigned-latch", | 
|  | cl::Hidden, cl::init(true)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | static const char *ClonedLoopTag = "irce.loop.clone"; | 
|  |  | 
|  | #define DEBUG_TYPE "irce" | 
|  |  | 
|  | namespace { | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// An inductive range check is conditional branch in a loop with | 
|  | /// | 
|  | ///  1. a very cold successor (i.e. the branch jumps to that successor very | 
|  | ///     rarely) | 
|  | /// | 
|  | ///  and | 
|  | /// | 
|  | ///  2. a condition that is provably true for some contiguous range of values | 
|  | ///     taken by the containing loop's induction variable. | 
|  | /// | 
|  | class InductiveRangeCheck { | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *Begin = nullptr; | 
|  | const SCEV *Step = nullptr; | 
|  | const SCEV *End = nullptr; | 
|  | Use *CheckUse = nullptr; | 
|  | bool IsSigned = true; | 
|  |  | 
|  | static bool parseRangeCheckICmp(Loop *L, ICmpInst *ICI, ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | Value *&Index, Value *&Length, | 
|  | bool &IsSigned); | 
|  |  | 
|  | static void | 
|  | extractRangeChecksFromCond(Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, Use &ConditionUse, | 
|  | SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks, | 
|  | SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &Visited); | 
|  |  | 
|  | public: | 
|  | const SCEV *getBegin() const { return Begin; } | 
|  | const SCEV *getStep() const { return Step; } | 
|  | const SCEV *getEnd() const { return End; } | 
|  | bool isSigned() const { return IsSigned; } | 
|  |  | 
|  | void print(raw_ostream &OS) const { | 
|  | OS << "InductiveRangeCheck:\n"; | 
|  | OS << "  Begin: "; | 
|  | Begin->print(OS); | 
|  | OS << "  Step: "; | 
|  | Step->print(OS); | 
|  | OS << "  End: "; | 
|  | End->print(OS); | 
|  | OS << "\n  CheckUse: "; | 
|  | getCheckUse()->getUser()->print(OS); | 
|  | OS << " Operand: " << getCheckUse()->getOperandNo() << "\n"; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | LLVM_DUMP_METHOD | 
|  | void dump() { | 
|  | print(dbgs()); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | Use *getCheckUse() const { return CheckUse; } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// Represents an signed integer range [Range.getBegin(), Range.getEnd()).  If | 
|  | /// R.getEnd() le R.getBegin(), then R denotes the empty range. | 
|  |  | 
|  | class Range { | 
|  | const SCEV *Begin; | 
|  | const SCEV *End; | 
|  |  | 
|  | public: | 
|  | Range(const SCEV *Begin, const SCEV *End) : Begin(Begin), End(End) { | 
|  | assert(Begin->getType() == End->getType() && "ill-typed range!"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | Type *getType() const { return Begin->getType(); } | 
|  | const SCEV *getBegin() const { return Begin; } | 
|  | const SCEV *getEnd() const { return End; } | 
|  | bool isEmpty(ScalarEvolution &SE, bool IsSigned) const { | 
|  | if (Begin == End) | 
|  | return true; | 
|  | if (IsSigned) | 
|  | return SE.isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, Begin, End); | 
|  | else | 
|  | return SE.isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, Begin, End); | 
|  | } | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// This is the value the condition of the branch needs to evaluate to for the | 
|  | /// branch to take the hot successor (see (1) above). | 
|  | bool getPassingDirection() { return true; } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// Computes a range for the induction variable (IndVar) in which the range | 
|  | /// check is redundant and can be constant-folded away.  The induction | 
|  | /// variable is not required to be the canonical {0,+,1} induction variable. | 
|  | Optional<Range> computeSafeIterationSpace(ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar, | 
|  | bool IsLatchSigned) const; | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// Parse out a set of inductive range checks from \p BI and append them to \p | 
|  | /// Checks. | 
|  | /// | 
|  | /// NB! There may be conditions feeding into \p BI that aren't inductive range | 
|  | /// checks, and hence don't end up in \p Checks. | 
|  | static void | 
|  | extractRangeChecksFromBranch(BranchInst *BI, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI, | 
|  | SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | class InductiveRangeCheckElimination { | 
|  | ScalarEvolution &SE; | 
|  | BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI; | 
|  | DominatorTree &DT; | 
|  | LoopInfo &LI; | 
|  |  | 
|  | public: | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheckElimination(ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI, DominatorTree &DT, | 
|  | LoopInfo &LI) | 
|  | : SE(SE), BPI(BPI), DT(DT), LI(LI) {} | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool run(Loop *L, function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | class IRCELegacyPass : public LoopPass { | 
|  | public: | 
|  | static char ID; | 
|  |  | 
|  | IRCELegacyPass() : LoopPass(ID) { | 
|  | initializeIRCELegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { | 
|  | AU.addRequired<BranchProbabilityInfoWrapperPass>(); | 
|  | getLoopAnalysisUsage(AU); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) override; | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | } // end anonymous namespace | 
|  |  | 
|  | char IRCELegacyPass::ID = 0; | 
|  |  | 
|  | INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(IRCELegacyPass, "irce", | 
|  | "Inductive range check elimination", false, false) | 
|  | INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(BranchProbabilityInfoWrapperPass) | 
|  | INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopPass) | 
|  | INITIALIZE_PASS_END(IRCELegacyPass, "irce", "Inductive range check elimination", | 
|  | false, false) | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// Parse a single ICmp instruction, `ICI`, into a range check.  If `ICI` cannot | 
|  | /// be interpreted as a range check, return false and set `Index` and `Length` | 
|  | /// to `nullptr`.  Otherwise set `Index` to the value being range checked, and | 
|  | /// set `Length` to the upper limit `Index` is being range checked. | 
|  | bool | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheck::parseRangeCheckICmp(Loop *L, ICmpInst *ICI, | 
|  | ScalarEvolution &SE, Value *&Index, | 
|  | Value *&Length, bool &IsSigned) { | 
|  | auto IsLoopInvariant = [&SE, L](Value *V) { | 
|  | return SE.isLoopInvariant(SE.getSCEV(V), L); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICI->getPredicate(); | 
|  | Value *LHS = ICI->getOperand(0); | 
|  | Value *RHS = ICI->getOperand(1); | 
|  |  | 
|  | switch (Pred) { | 
|  | default: | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE: | 
|  | std::swap(LHS, RHS); | 
|  | LLVM_FALLTHROUGH; | 
|  | case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE: | 
|  | IsSigned = true; | 
|  | if (match(RHS, m_ConstantInt<0>())) { | 
|  | Index = LHS; | 
|  | return true; // Lower. | 
|  | } | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT: | 
|  | std::swap(LHS, RHS); | 
|  | LLVM_FALLTHROUGH; | 
|  | case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT: | 
|  | IsSigned = true; | 
|  | if (match(RHS, m_ConstantInt<-1>())) { | 
|  | Index = LHS; | 
|  | return true; // Lower. | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (IsLoopInvariant(LHS)) { | 
|  | Index = RHS; | 
|  | Length = LHS; | 
|  | return true; // Upper. | 
|  | } | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT: | 
|  | std::swap(LHS, RHS); | 
|  | LLVM_FALLTHROUGH; | 
|  | case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT: | 
|  | IsSigned = false; | 
|  | if (IsLoopInvariant(LHS)) { | 
|  | Index = RHS; | 
|  | Length = LHS; | 
|  | return true; // Both lower and upper. | 
|  | } | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | llvm_unreachable("default clause returns!"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | void InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromCond( | 
|  | Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, Use &ConditionUse, | 
|  | SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks, | 
|  | SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &Visited) { | 
|  | Value *Condition = ConditionUse.get(); | 
|  | if (!Visited.insert(Condition).second) | 
|  | return; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // TODO: Do the same for OR, XOR, NOT etc? | 
|  | if (match(Condition, m_And(m_Value(), m_Value()))) { | 
|  | extractRangeChecksFromCond(L, SE, cast<User>(Condition)->getOperandUse(0), | 
|  | Checks, Visited); | 
|  | extractRangeChecksFromCond(L, SE, cast<User>(Condition)->getOperandUse(1), | 
|  | Checks, Visited); | 
|  | return; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Condition); | 
|  | if (!ICI) | 
|  | return; | 
|  |  | 
|  | Value *Length = nullptr, *Index; | 
|  | bool IsSigned; | 
|  | if (!parseRangeCheckICmp(L, ICI, SE, Index, Length, IsSigned)) | 
|  | return; | 
|  |  | 
|  | const auto *IndexAddRec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(Index)); | 
|  | bool IsAffineIndex = | 
|  | IndexAddRec && (IndexAddRec->getLoop() == L) && IndexAddRec->isAffine(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!IsAffineIndex) | 
|  | return; | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *End = nullptr; | 
|  | // We strengthen "0 <= I" to "0 <= I < INT_SMAX" and "I < L" to "0 <= I < L". | 
|  | // We can potentially do much better here. | 
|  | if (Length) | 
|  | End = SE.getSCEV(Length); | 
|  | else { | 
|  | // So far we can only reach this point for Signed range check. This may | 
|  | // change in future. In this case we will need to pick Unsigned max for the | 
|  | // unsigned range check. | 
|  | unsigned BitWidth = cast<IntegerType>(IndexAddRec->getType())->getBitWidth(); | 
|  | const SCEV *SIntMax = SE.getConstant(APInt::getSignedMaxValue(BitWidth)); | 
|  | End = SIntMax; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheck IRC; | 
|  | IRC.End = End; | 
|  | IRC.Begin = IndexAddRec->getStart(); | 
|  | IRC.Step = IndexAddRec->getStepRecurrence(SE); | 
|  | IRC.CheckUse = &ConditionUse; | 
|  | IRC.IsSigned = IsSigned; | 
|  | Checks.push_back(IRC); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | void InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromBranch( | 
|  | BranchInst *BI, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI, | 
|  | SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks) { | 
|  | if (BI->isUnconditional() || BI->getParent() == L->getLoopLatch()) | 
|  | return; | 
|  |  | 
|  | BranchProbability LikelyTaken(15, 16); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!SkipProfitabilityChecks && BPI && | 
|  | BPI->getEdgeProbability(BI->getParent(), (unsigned)0) < LikelyTaken) | 
|  | return; | 
|  |  | 
|  | SmallPtrSet<Value *, 8> Visited; | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromCond(L, SE, BI->getOperandUse(0), | 
|  | Checks, Visited); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Add metadata to the loop L to disable loop optimizations. Callers need to | 
|  | // confirm that optimizing loop L is not beneficial. | 
|  | static void DisableAllLoopOptsOnLoop(Loop &L) { | 
|  | // We do not care about any existing loopID related metadata for L, since we | 
|  | // are setting all loop metadata to false. | 
|  | LLVMContext &Context = L.getHeader()->getContext(); | 
|  | // Reserve first location for self reference to the LoopID metadata node. | 
|  | MDNode *Dummy = MDNode::get(Context, {}); | 
|  | MDNode *DisableUnroll = MDNode::get( | 
|  | Context, {MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.unroll.disable")}); | 
|  | Metadata *FalseVal = | 
|  | ConstantAsMetadata::get(ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(Context), 0)); | 
|  | MDNode *DisableVectorize = MDNode::get( | 
|  | Context, | 
|  | {MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.vectorize.enable"), FalseVal}); | 
|  | MDNode *DisableLICMVersioning = MDNode::get( | 
|  | Context, {MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.licm_versioning.disable")}); | 
|  | MDNode *DisableDistribution= MDNode::get( | 
|  | Context, | 
|  | {MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.distribute.enable"), FalseVal}); | 
|  | MDNode *NewLoopID = | 
|  | MDNode::get(Context, {Dummy, DisableUnroll, DisableVectorize, | 
|  | DisableLICMVersioning, DisableDistribution}); | 
|  | // Set operand 0 to refer to the loop id itself. | 
|  | NewLoopID->replaceOperandWith(0, NewLoopID); | 
|  | L.setLoopID(NewLoopID); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | namespace { | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Keeps track of the structure of a loop.  This is similar to llvm::Loop, | 
|  | // except that it is more lightweight and can track the state of a loop through | 
|  | // changing and potentially invalid IR.  This structure also formalizes the | 
|  | // kinds of loops we can deal with -- ones that have a single latch that is also | 
|  | // an exiting block *and* have a canonical induction variable. | 
|  | struct LoopStructure { | 
|  | const char *Tag = ""; | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *Header = nullptr; | 
|  | BasicBlock *Latch = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // `Latch's terminator instruction is `LatchBr', and it's `LatchBrExitIdx'th | 
|  | // successor is `LatchExit', the exit block of the loop. | 
|  | BranchInst *LatchBr = nullptr; | 
|  | BasicBlock *LatchExit = nullptr; | 
|  | unsigned LatchBrExitIdx = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // The loop represented by this instance of LoopStructure is semantically | 
|  | // equivalent to: | 
|  | // | 
|  | // intN_ty inc = IndVarIncreasing ? 1 : -1; | 
|  | // pred_ty predicate = IndVarIncreasing ? ICMP_SLT : ICMP_SGT; | 
|  | // | 
|  | // for (intN_ty iv = IndVarStart; predicate(iv, LoopExitAt); iv = IndVarBase) | 
|  | //   ... body ... | 
|  |  | 
|  | Value *IndVarBase = nullptr; | 
|  | Value *IndVarStart = nullptr; | 
|  | Value *IndVarStep = nullptr; | 
|  | Value *LoopExitAt = nullptr; | 
|  | bool IndVarIncreasing = false; | 
|  | bool IsSignedPredicate = true; | 
|  |  | 
|  | LoopStructure() = default; | 
|  |  | 
|  | template <typename M> LoopStructure map(M Map) const { | 
|  | LoopStructure Result; | 
|  | Result.Tag = Tag; | 
|  | Result.Header = cast<BasicBlock>(Map(Header)); | 
|  | Result.Latch = cast<BasicBlock>(Map(Latch)); | 
|  | Result.LatchBr = cast<BranchInst>(Map(LatchBr)); | 
|  | Result.LatchExit = cast<BasicBlock>(Map(LatchExit)); | 
|  | Result.LatchBrExitIdx = LatchBrExitIdx; | 
|  | Result.IndVarBase = Map(IndVarBase); | 
|  | Result.IndVarStart = Map(IndVarStart); | 
|  | Result.IndVarStep = Map(IndVarStep); | 
|  | Result.LoopExitAt = Map(LoopExitAt); | 
|  | Result.IndVarIncreasing = IndVarIncreasing; | 
|  | Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate; | 
|  | return Result; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | static Optional<LoopStructure> parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &, | 
|  | BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI, | 
|  | Loop &, const char *&); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// This class is used to constrain loops to run within a given iteration space. | 
|  | /// The algorithm this class implements is given a Loop and a range [Begin, | 
|  | /// End).  The algorithm then tries to break out a "main loop" out of the loop | 
|  | /// it is given in a way that the "main loop" runs with the induction variable | 
|  | /// in a subset of [Begin, End).  The algorithm emits appropriate pre and post | 
|  | /// loops to run any remaining iterations.  The pre loop runs any iterations in | 
|  | /// which the induction variable is < Begin, and the post loop runs any | 
|  | /// iterations in which the induction variable is >= End. | 
|  | class LoopConstrainer { | 
|  | // The representation of a clone of the original loop we started out with. | 
|  | struct ClonedLoop { | 
|  | // The cloned blocks | 
|  | std::vector<BasicBlock *> Blocks; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // `Map` maps values in the clonee into values in the cloned version | 
|  | ValueToValueMapTy Map; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // An instance of `LoopStructure` for the cloned loop | 
|  | LoopStructure Structure; | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Result of rewriting the range of a loop.  See changeIterationSpaceEnd for | 
|  | // more details on what these fields mean. | 
|  | struct RewrittenRangeInfo { | 
|  | BasicBlock *PseudoExit = nullptr; | 
|  | BasicBlock *ExitSelector = nullptr; | 
|  | std::vector<PHINode *> PHIValuesAtPseudoExit; | 
|  | PHINode *IndVarEnd = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | RewrittenRangeInfo() = default; | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Calculated subranges we restrict the iteration space of the main loop to. | 
|  | // See the implementation of `calculateSubRanges' for more details on how | 
|  | // these fields are computed.  `LowLimit` is None if there is no restriction | 
|  | // on low end of the restricted iteration space of the main loop.  `HighLimit` | 
|  | // is None if there is no restriction on high end of the restricted iteration | 
|  | // space of the main loop. | 
|  |  | 
|  | struct SubRanges { | 
|  | Optional<const SCEV *> LowLimit; | 
|  | Optional<const SCEV *> HighLimit; | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // A utility function that does a `replaceUsesOfWith' on the incoming block | 
|  | // set of a `PHINode' -- replaces instances of `Block' in the `PHINode's | 
|  | // incoming block list with `ReplaceBy'. | 
|  | static void replacePHIBlock(PHINode *PN, BasicBlock *Block, | 
|  | BasicBlock *ReplaceBy); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Compute a safe set of limits for the main loop to run in -- effectively the | 
|  | // intersection of `Range' and the iteration space of the original loop. | 
|  | // Return None if unable to compute the set of subranges. | 
|  | Optional<SubRanges> calculateSubRanges(bool IsSignedPredicate) const; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Clone `OriginalLoop' and return the result in CLResult.  The IR after | 
|  | // running `cloneLoop' is well formed except for the PHI nodes in CLResult -- | 
|  | // the PHI nodes say that there is an incoming edge from `OriginalPreheader` | 
|  | // but there is no such edge. | 
|  | void cloneLoop(ClonedLoop &CLResult, const char *Tag) const; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Create the appropriate loop structure needed to describe a cloned copy of | 
|  | // `Original`.  The clone is described by `VM`. | 
|  | Loop *createClonedLoopStructure(Loop *Original, Loop *Parent, | 
|  | ValueToValueMapTy &VM, bool IsSubloop); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Rewrite the iteration space of the loop denoted by (LS, Preheader). The | 
|  | // iteration space of the rewritten loop ends at ExitLoopAt.  The start of the | 
|  | // iteration space is not changed.  `ExitLoopAt' is assumed to be slt | 
|  | // `OriginalHeaderCount'. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // If there are iterations left to execute, control is made to jump to | 
|  | // `ContinuationBlock', otherwise they take the normal loop exit.  The | 
|  | // returned `RewrittenRangeInfo' object is populated as follows: | 
|  | // | 
|  | //  .PseudoExit is a basic block that unconditionally branches to | 
|  | //      `ContinuationBlock'. | 
|  | // | 
|  | //  .ExitSelector is a basic block that decides, on exit from the loop, | 
|  | //      whether to branch to the "true" exit or to `PseudoExit'. | 
|  | // | 
|  | //  .PHIValuesAtPseudoExit are PHINodes in `PseudoExit' that compute the value | 
|  | //      for each PHINode in the loop header on taking the pseudo exit. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // After changeIterationSpaceEnd, `Preheader' is no longer a legitimate | 
|  | // preheader because it is made to branch to the loop header only | 
|  | // conditionally. | 
|  | RewrittenRangeInfo | 
|  | changeIterationSpaceEnd(const LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *Preheader, | 
|  | Value *ExitLoopAt, | 
|  | BasicBlock *ContinuationBlock) const; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // The loop denoted by `LS' has `OldPreheader' as its preheader.  This | 
|  | // function creates a new preheader for `LS' and returns it. | 
|  | BasicBlock *createPreheader(const LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *OldPreheader, | 
|  | const char *Tag) const; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // `ContinuationBlockAndPreheader' was the continuation block for some call to | 
|  | // `changeIterationSpaceEnd' and is the preheader to the loop denoted by `LS'. | 
|  | // This function rewrites the PHI nodes in `LS.Header' to start with the | 
|  | // correct value. | 
|  | void rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs( | 
|  | LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *ContinuationBlockAndPreheader, | 
|  | const LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo &RRI) const; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Even though we do not preserve any passes at this time, we at least need to | 
|  | // keep the parent loop structure consistent.  The `LPPassManager' seems to | 
|  | // verify this after running a loop pass.  This function adds the list of | 
|  | // blocks denoted by BBs to this loops parent loop if required. | 
|  | void addToParentLoopIfNeeded(ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> BBs); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Some global state. | 
|  | Function &F; | 
|  | LLVMContext &Ctx; | 
|  | ScalarEvolution &SE; | 
|  | DominatorTree &DT; | 
|  | LoopInfo &LI; | 
|  | function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Information about the original loop we started out with. | 
|  | Loop &OriginalLoop; | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *LatchTakenCount = nullptr; | 
|  | BasicBlock *OriginalPreheader = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // The preheader of the main loop.  This may or may not be different from | 
|  | // `OriginalPreheader'. | 
|  | BasicBlock *MainLoopPreheader = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // The range we need to run the main loop in. | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheck::Range Range; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // The structure of the main loop (see comment at the beginning of this class | 
|  | // for a definition) | 
|  | LoopStructure MainLoopStructure; | 
|  |  | 
|  | public: | 
|  | LoopConstrainer(Loop &L, LoopInfo &LI, | 
|  | function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop, | 
|  | const LoopStructure &LS, ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | DominatorTree &DT, InductiveRangeCheck::Range R) | 
|  | : F(*L.getHeader()->getParent()), Ctx(L.getHeader()->getContext()), | 
|  | SE(SE), DT(DT), LI(LI), LPMAddNewLoop(LPMAddNewLoop), OriginalLoop(L), | 
|  | Range(R), MainLoopStructure(LS) {} | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Entry point for the algorithm.  Returns true on success. | 
|  | bool run(); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | } // end anonymous namespace | 
|  |  | 
|  | void LoopConstrainer::replacePHIBlock(PHINode *PN, BasicBlock *Block, | 
|  | BasicBlock *ReplaceBy) { | 
|  | for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) | 
|  | if (PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == Block) | 
|  | PN->setIncomingBlock(i, ReplaceBy); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// Given a loop with an deccreasing induction variable, is it possible to | 
|  | /// safely calculate the bounds of a new loop using the given Predicate. | 
|  | static bool isSafeDecreasingBound(const SCEV *Start, | 
|  | const SCEV *BoundSCEV, const SCEV *Step, | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate Pred, | 
|  | unsigned LatchBrExitIdx, | 
|  | Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) { | 
|  | if (Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT && | 
|  | Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT) | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!SE.isAvailableAtLoopEntry(BoundSCEV, L)) | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(SE.isKnownNegative(Step) && "expecting negative step"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: isSafeDecreasingBound with:\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Start: " << *Start << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Step: " << *Step << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: BoundSCEV: " << *BoundSCEV << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Pred: " << ICmpInst::getPredicateName(Pred) | 
|  | << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: LatchExitBrIdx: " << LatchBrExitIdx << "\n"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool IsSigned = ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred); | 
|  | // The predicate that we need to check that the induction variable lies | 
|  | // within bounds. | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate BoundPred = | 
|  | IsSigned ? CmpInst::ICMP_SGT : CmpInst::ICMP_UGT; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (LatchBrExitIdx == 1) | 
|  | return SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start, BoundSCEV); | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(LatchBrExitIdx == 0 && | 
|  | "LatchBrExitIdx should be either 0 or 1"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *StepPlusOne = SE.getAddExpr(Step, SE.getOne(Step->getType())); | 
|  | unsigned BitWidth = cast<IntegerType>(BoundSCEV->getType())->getBitWidth(); | 
|  | APInt Min = IsSigned ? APInt::getSignedMinValue(BitWidth) : | 
|  | APInt::getMinValue(BitWidth); | 
|  | const SCEV *Limit = SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getConstant(Min), StepPlusOne); | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *MinusOne = | 
|  | SE.getMinusSCEV(BoundSCEV, SE.getOne(BoundSCEV->getType())); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start, MinusOne) && | 
|  | SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, BoundSCEV, Limit); | 
|  |  | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// Given a loop with an increasing induction variable, is it possible to | 
|  | /// safely calculate the bounds of a new loop using the given Predicate. | 
|  | static bool isSafeIncreasingBound(const SCEV *Start, | 
|  | const SCEV *BoundSCEV, const SCEV *Step, | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate Pred, | 
|  | unsigned LatchBrExitIdx, | 
|  | Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) { | 
|  | if (Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT && | 
|  | Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT) | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!SE.isAvailableAtLoopEntry(BoundSCEV, L)) | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: isSafeIncreasingBound with:\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Start: " << *Start << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Step: " << *Step << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: BoundSCEV: " << *BoundSCEV << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Pred: " << ICmpInst::getPredicateName(Pred) | 
|  | << "\n"); | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: LatchExitBrIdx: " << LatchBrExitIdx << "\n"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool IsSigned = ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred); | 
|  | // The predicate that we need to check that the induction variable lies | 
|  | // within bounds. | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate BoundPred = | 
|  | IsSigned ? CmpInst::ICMP_SLT : CmpInst::ICMP_ULT; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (LatchBrExitIdx == 1) | 
|  | return SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start, BoundSCEV); | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(LatchBrExitIdx == 0 && "LatchBrExitIdx should be 0 or 1"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *StepMinusOne = | 
|  | SE.getMinusSCEV(Step, SE.getOne(Step->getType())); | 
|  | unsigned BitWidth = cast<IntegerType>(BoundSCEV->getType())->getBitWidth(); | 
|  | APInt Max = IsSigned ? APInt::getSignedMaxValue(BitWidth) : | 
|  | APInt::getMaxValue(BitWidth); | 
|  | const SCEV *Limit = SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getConstant(Max), StepMinusOne); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return (SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start, | 
|  | SE.getAddExpr(BoundSCEV, Step)) && | 
|  | SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, BoundSCEV, Limit)); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | Optional<LoopStructure> | 
|  | LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI, Loop &L, | 
|  | const char *&FailureReason) { | 
|  | if (!L.isLoopSimplifyForm()) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "loop not in LoopSimplify form"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *Latch = L.getLoopLatch(); | 
|  | assert(Latch && "Simplified loops only have one latch!"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (Latch->getTerminator()->getMetadata(ClonedLoopTag)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "loop has already been cloned"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!L.isLoopExiting(Latch)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "no loop latch"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *Header = L.getHeader(); | 
|  | BasicBlock *Preheader = L.getLoopPreheader(); | 
|  | if (!Preheader) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "no preheader"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | BranchInst *LatchBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(Latch->getTerminator()); | 
|  | if (!LatchBr || LatchBr->isUnconditional()) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "latch terminator not conditional branch"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | unsigned LatchBrExitIdx = LatchBr->getSuccessor(0) == Header ? 1 : 0; | 
|  |  | 
|  | BranchProbability ExitProbability = | 
|  | BPI ? BPI->getEdgeProbability(LatchBr->getParent(), LatchBrExitIdx) | 
|  | : BranchProbability::getZero(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!SkipProfitabilityChecks && | 
|  | ExitProbability > BranchProbability(1, MaxExitProbReciprocal)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "short running loop, not profitable"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(LatchBr->getCondition()); | 
|  | if (!ICI || !isa<IntegerType>(ICI->getOperand(0)->getType())) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "latch terminator branch not conditional on integral icmp"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *LatchCount = SE.getExitCount(&L, Latch); | 
|  | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(LatchCount)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "could not compute latch count"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICI->getPredicate(); | 
|  | Value *LeftValue = ICI->getOperand(0); | 
|  | const SCEV *LeftSCEV = SE.getSCEV(LeftValue); | 
|  | IntegerType *IndVarTy = cast<IntegerType>(LeftValue->getType()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | Value *RightValue = ICI->getOperand(1); | 
|  | const SCEV *RightSCEV = SE.getSCEV(RightValue); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // We canonicalize `ICI` such that `LeftSCEV` is an add recurrence. | 
|  | if (!isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LeftSCEV)) { | 
|  | if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(RightSCEV)) { | 
|  | std::swap(LeftSCEV, RightSCEV); | 
|  | std::swap(LeftValue, RightValue); | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred); | 
|  | } else { | 
|  | FailureReason = "no add recurrences in the icmp"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | auto HasNoSignedWrap = [&](const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR) { | 
|  | if (AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNSW)) | 
|  | return true; | 
|  |  | 
|  | IntegerType *Ty = cast<IntegerType>(AR->getType()); | 
|  | IntegerType *WideTy = | 
|  | IntegerType::get(Ty->getContext(), Ty->getBitWidth() * 2); | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEVAddRecExpr *ExtendAfterOp = | 
|  | dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR, WideTy)); | 
|  | if (ExtendAfterOp) { | 
|  | const SCEV *ExtendedStart = SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR->getStart(), WideTy); | 
|  | const SCEV *ExtendedStep = | 
|  | SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR->getStepRecurrence(SE), WideTy); | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool NoSignedWrap = ExtendAfterOp->getStart() == ExtendedStart && | 
|  | ExtendAfterOp->getStepRecurrence(SE) == ExtendedStep; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (NoSignedWrap) | 
|  | return true; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // We may have proved this when computing the sign extension above. | 
|  | return AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNSW) != SCEV::FlagAnyWrap; | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // `ICI` is interpreted as taking the backedge if the *next* value of the | 
|  | // induction variable satisfies some constraint. | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVarBase = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LeftSCEV); | 
|  | if (!IndVarBase->isAffine()) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "LHS in icmp not induction variable"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  | const SCEV* StepRec = IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE); | 
|  | if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(StepRec)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "LHS in icmp not induction variable"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  | ConstantInt *StepCI = cast<SCEVConstant>(StepRec)->getValue(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (ICI->isEquality() && !HasNoSignedWrap(IndVarBase)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "LHS in icmp needs nsw for equality predicates"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(!StepCI->isZero() && "Zero step?"); | 
|  | bool IsIncreasing = !StepCI->isNegative(); | 
|  | bool IsSignedPredicate = ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred); | 
|  | const SCEV *StartNext = IndVarBase->getStart(); | 
|  | const SCEV *Addend = SE.getNegativeSCEV(IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE)); | 
|  | const SCEV *IndVarStart = SE.getAddExpr(StartNext, Addend); | 
|  | const SCEV *Step = SE.getSCEV(StepCI); | 
|  |  | 
|  | ConstantInt *One = ConstantInt::get(IndVarTy, 1); | 
|  | if (IsIncreasing) { | 
|  | bool DecreasedRightValueByOne = false; | 
|  | if (StepCI->isOne()) { | 
|  | // Try to turn eq/ne predicates to those we can work with. | 
|  | if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && LatchBrExitIdx == 1) | 
|  | // while (++i != len) {         while (++i < len) { | 
|  | //   ...                 --->     ... | 
|  | // }                            } | 
|  | // If both parts are known non-negative, it is profitable to use | 
|  | // unsigned comparison in increasing loop. This allows us to make the | 
|  | // comparison check against "RightSCEV + 1" more optimistic. | 
|  | if (isKnownNonNegativeInLoop(IndVarStart, &L, SE) && | 
|  | isKnownNonNegativeInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE)) | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT; | 
|  | else | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT; | 
|  | else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && LatchBrExitIdx == 0) { | 
|  | // while (true) {               while (true) { | 
|  | //   if (++i == len)     --->     if (++i > len - 1) | 
|  | //     break;                       break; | 
|  | //   ...                          ... | 
|  | // }                            } | 
|  | if (IndVarBase->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNUW) && | 
|  | cannotBeMinInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /*Signed*/false)) { | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT; | 
|  | RightSCEV = SE.getMinusSCEV(RightSCEV, | 
|  | SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType())); | 
|  | DecreasedRightValueByOne = true; | 
|  | } else if (cannotBeMinInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /*Signed*/true)) { | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT; | 
|  | RightSCEV = SE.getMinusSCEV(RightSCEV, | 
|  | SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType())); | 
|  | DecreasedRightValueByOne = true; | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool LTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT); | 
|  | bool GTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT); | 
|  | bool FoundExpectedPred = | 
|  | (LTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 1) || (GTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 0); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!FoundExpectedPred) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "expected icmp slt semantically, found something else"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | IsSignedPredicate = ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred); | 
|  | if (!IsSignedPredicate && !AllowUnsignedLatchCondition) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "unsigned latch conditions are explicitly prohibited"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!isSafeIncreasingBound(IndVarStart, RightSCEV, Step, Pred, | 
|  | LatchBrExitIdx, &L, SE)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "Unsafe loop bounds"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  | if (LatchBrExitIdx == 0) { | 
|  | // We need to increase the right value unless we have already decreased | 
|  | // it virtually when we replaced EQ with SGT. | 
|  | if (!DecreasedRightValueByOne) { | 
|  | IRBuilder<> B(Preheader->getTerminator()); | 
|  | RightValue = B.CreateAdd(RightValue, One); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } else { | 
|  | assert(!DecreasedRightValueByOne && | 
|  | "Right value can be decreased only for LatchBrExitIdx == 0!"); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } else { | 
|  | bool IncreasedRightValueByOne = false; | 
|  | if (StepCI->isMinusOne()) { | 
|  | // Try to turn eq/ne predicates to those we can work with. | 
|  | if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && LatchBrExitIdx == 1) | 
|  | // while (--i != len) {         while (--i > len) { | 
|  | //   ...                 --->     ... | 
|  | // }                            } | 
|  | // We intentionally don't turn the predicate into UGT even if we know | 
|  | // that both operands are non-negative, because it will only pessimize | 
|  | // our check against "RightSCEV - 1". | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT; | 
|  | else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && LatchBrExitIdx == 0) { | 
|  | // while (true) {               while (true) { | 
|  | //   if (--i == len)     --->     if (--i < len + 1) | 
|  | //     break;                       break; | 
|  | //   ...                          ... | 
|  | // }                            } | 
|  | if (IndVarBase->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNUW) && | 
|  | cannotBeMaxInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /* Signed */ false)) { | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT; | 
|  | RightSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(RightSCEV, SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType())); | 
|  | IncreasedRightValueByOne = true; | 
|  | } else if (cannotBeMaxInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /* Signed */ true)) { | 
|  | Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT; | 
|  | RightSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(RightSCEV, SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType())); | 
|  | IncreasedRightValueByOne = true; | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool LTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT); | 
|  | bool GTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT); | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool FoundExpectedPred = | 
|  | (GTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 1) || (LTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 0); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!FoundExpectedPred) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "expected icmp sgt semantically, found something else"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | IsSignedPredicate = | 
|  | Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!IsSignedPredicate && !AllowUnsignedLatchCondition) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "unsigned latch conditions are explicitly prohibited"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!isSafeDecreasingBound(IndVarStart, RightSCEV, Step, Pred, | 
|  | LatchBrExitIdx, &L, SE)) { | 
|  | FailureReason = "Unsafe bounds"; | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (LatchBrExitIdx == 0) { | 
|  | // We need to decrease the right value unless we have already increased | 
|  | // it virtually when we replaced EQ with SLT. | 
|  | if (!IncreasedRightValueByOne) { | 
|  | IRBuilder<> B(Preheader->getTerminator()); | 
|  | RightValue = B.CreateSub(RightValue, One); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } else { | 
|  | assert(!IncreasedRightValueByOne && | 
|  | "Right value can be increased only for LatchBrExitIdx == 0!"); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  | BasicBlock *LatchExit = LatchBr->getSuccessor(LatchBrExitIdx); | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(SE.getLoopDisposition(LatchCount, &L) == | 
|  | ScalarEvolution::LoopInvariant && | 
|  | "loop variant exit count doesn't make sense!"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(!L.contains(LatchExit) && "expected an exit block!"); | 
|  | const DataLayout &DL = Preheader->getModule()->getDataLayout(); | 
|  | Value *IndVarStartV = | 
|  | SCEVExpander(SE, DL, "irce") | 
|  | .expandCodeFor(IndVarStart, IndVarTy, Preheader->getTerminator()); | 
|  | IndVarStartV->setName("indvar.start"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | LoopStructure Result; | 
|  |  | 
|  | Result.Tag = "main"; | 
|  | Result.Header = Header; | 
|  | Result.Latch = Latch; | 
|  | Result.LatchBr = LatchBr; | 
|  | Result.LatchExit = LatchExit; | 
|  | Result.LatchBrExitIdx = LatchBrExitIdx; | 
|  | Result.IndVarStart = IndVarStartV; | 
|  | Result.IndVarStep = StepCI; | 
|  | Result.IndVarBase = LeftValue; | 
|  | Result.IndVarIncreasing = IsIncreasing; | 
|  | Result.LoopExitAt = RightValue; | 
|  | Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate; | 
|  |  | 
|  | FailureReason = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | return Result; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | Optional<LoopConstrainer::SubRanges> | 
|  | LoopConstrainer::calculateSubRanges(bool IsSignedPredicate) const { | 
|  | IntegerType *Ty = cast<IntegerType>(LatchTakenCount->getType()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (Range.getType() != Ty) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  |  | 
|  | LoopConstrainer::SubRanges Result; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // I think we can be more aggressive here and make this nuw / nsw if the | 
|  | // addition that feeds into the icmp for the latch's terminating branch is nuw | 
|  | // / nsw.  In any case, a wrapping 2's complement addition is safe. | 
|  | const SCEV *Start = SE.getSCEV(MainLoopStructure.IndVarStart); | 
|  | const SCEV *End = SE.getSCEV(MainLoopStructure.LoopExitAt); | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool Increasing = MainLoopStructure.IndVarIncreasing; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // We compute `Smallest` and `Greatest` such that [Smallest, Greatest), or | 
|  | // [Smallest, GreatestSeen] is the range of values the induction variable | 
|  | // takes. | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *Smallest = nullptr, *Greatest = nullptr, *GreatestSeen = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *One = SE.getOne(Ty); | 
|  | if (Increasing) { | 
|  | Smallest = Start; | 
|  | Greatest = End; | 
|  | // No overflow, because the range [Smallest, GreatestSeen] is not empty. | 
|  | GreatestSeen = SE.getMinusSCEV(End, One); | 
|  | } else { | 
|  | // These two computations may sign-overflow.  Here is why that is okay: | 
|  | // | 
|  | // We know that the induction variable does not sign-overflow on any | 
|  | // iteration except the last one, and it starts at `Start` and ends at | 
|  | // `End`, decrementing by one every time. | 
|  | // | 
|  | //  * if `Smallest` sign-overflows we know `End` is `INT_SMAX`. Since the | 
|  | //    induction variable is decreasing we know that that the smallest value | 
|  | //    the loop body is actually executed with is `INT_SMIN` == `Smallest`. | 
|  | // | 
|  | //  * if `Greatest` sign-overflows, we know it can only be `INT_SMIN`.  In | 
|  | //    that case, `Clamp` will always return `Smallest` and | 
|  | //    [`Result.LowLimit`, `Result.HighLimit`) = [`Smallest`, `Smallest`) | 
|  | //    will be an empty range.  Returning an empty range is always safe. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Smallest = SE.getAddExpr(End, One); | 
|  | Greatest = SE.getAddExpr(Start, One); | 
|  | GreatestSeen = Start; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | auto Clamp = [this, Smallest, Greatest, IsSignedPredicate](const SCEV *S) { | 
|  | return IsSignedPredicate | 
|  | ? SE.getSMaxExpr(Smallest, SE.getSMinExpr(Greatest, S)) | 
|  | : SE.getUMaxExpr(Smallest, SE.getUMinExpr(Greatest, S)); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // In some cases we can prove that we don't need a pre or post loop. | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate PredLE = | 
|  | IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE; | 
|  | ICmpInst::Predicate PredLT = | 
|  | IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT; | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool ProvablyNoPreloop = | 
|  | SE.isKnownPredicate(PredLE, Range.getBegin(), Smallest); | 
|  | if (!ProvablyNoPreloop) | 
|  | Result.LowLimit = Clamp(Range.getBegin()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool ProvablyNoPostLoop = | 
|  | SE.isKnownPredicate(PredLT, GreatestSeen, Range.getEnd()); | 
|  | if (!ProvablyNoPostLoop) | 
|  | Result.HighLimit = Clamp(Range.getEnd()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return Result; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | void LoopConstrainer::cloneLoop(LoopConstrainer::ClonedLoop &Result, | 
|  | const char *Tag) const { | 
|  | for (BasicBlock *BB : OriginalLoop.getBlocks()) { | 
|  | BasicBlock *Clone = CloneBasicBlock(BB, Result.Map, Twine(".") + Tag, &F); | 
|  | Result.Blocks.push_back(Clone); | 
|  | Result.Map[BB] = Clone; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | auto GetClonedValue = [&Result](Value *V) { | 
|  | assert(V && "null values not in domain!"); | 
|  | auto It = Result.Map.find(V); | 
|  | if (It == Result.Map.end()) | 
|  | return V; | 
|  | return static_cast<Value *>(It->second); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | auto *ClonedLatch = | 
|  | cast<BasicBlock>(GetClonedValue(OriginalLoop.getLoopLatch())); | 
|  | ClonedLatch->getTerminator()->setMetadata(ClonedLoopTag, | 
|  | MDNode::get(Ctx, {})); | 
|  |  | 
|  | Result.Structure = MainLoopStructure.map(GetClonedValue); | 
|  | Result.Structure.Tag = Tag; | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (unsigned i = 0, e = Result.Blocks.size(); i != e; ++i) { | 
|  | BasicBlock *ClonedBB = Result.Blocks[i]; | 
|  | BasicBlock *OriginalBB = OriginalLoop.getBlocks()[i]; | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(Result.Map[OriginalBB] == ClonedBB && "invariant!"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (Instruction &I : *ClonedBB) | 
|  | RemapInstruction(&I, Result.Map, | 
|  | RF_NoModuleLevelChanges | RF_IgnoreMissingLocals); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Exit blocks will now have one more predecessor and their PHI nodes need | 
|  | // to be edited to reflect that.  No phi nodes need to be introduced because | 
|  | // the loop is in LCSSA. | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (auto *SBB : successors(OriginalBB)) { | 
|  | if (OriginalLoop.contains(SBB)) | 
|  | continue; // not an exit block | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (PHINode &PN : SBB->phis()) { | 
|  | Value *OldIncoming = PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(OriginalBB); | 
|  | PN.addIncoming(GetClonedValue(OldIncoming), ClonedBB); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo LoopConstrainer::changeIterationSpaceEnd( | 
|  | const LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *Preheader, Value *ExitSubloopAt, | 
|  | BasicBlock *ContinuationBlock) const { | 
|  | // We start with a loop with a single latch: | 
|  | // | 
|  | //    +--------------------+ | 
|  | //    |                    | | 
|  | //    |     preheader      | | 
|  | //    |                    | | 
|  | //    +--------+-----------+ | 
|  | //             |      ----------------\ | 
|  | //             |     /                | | 
|  | //    +--------v----v------+          | | 
|  | //    |                    |          | | 
|  | //    |      header        |          | | 
|  | //    |                    |          | | 
|  | //    +--------------------+          | | 
|  | //                                    | | 
|  | //            .....                   | | 
|  | //                                    | | 
|  | //    +--------------------+          | | 
|  | //    |                    |          | | 
|  | //    |       latch        >----------/ | 
|  | //    |                    | | 
|  | //    +-------v------------+ | 
|  | //            | | 
|  | //            | | 
|  | //            |   +--------------------+ | 
|  | //            |   |                    | | 
|  | //            +--->   original exit    | | 
|  | //                |                    | | 
|  | //                +--------------------+ | 
|  | // | 
|  | // We change the control flow to look like | 
|  | // | 
|  | // | 
|  | //    +--------------------+ | 
|  | //    |                    | | 
|  | //    |     preheader      >-------------------------+ | 
|  | //    |                    |                         | | 
|  | //    +--------v-----------+                         | | 
|  | //             |    /-------------+                  | | 
|  | //             |   /              |                  | | 
|  | //    +--------v--v--------+      |                  | | 
|  | //    |                    |      |                  | | 
|  | //    |      header        |      |   +--------+     | | 
|  | //    |                    |      |   |        |     | | 
|  | //    +--------------------+      |   |  +-----v-----v-----------+ | 
|  | //                                |   |  |                       | | 
|  | //                                |   |  |     .pseudo.exit      | | 
|  | //                                |   |  |                       | | 
|  | //                                |   |  +-----------v-----------+ | 
|  | //                                |   |              | | 
|  | //            .....               |   |              | | 
|  | //                                |   |     +--------v-------------+ | 
|  | //    +--------------------+      |   |     |                      | | 
|  | //    |                    |      |   |     |   ContinuationBlock  | | 
|  | //    |       latch        >------+   |     |                      | | 
|  | //    |                    |          |     +----------------------+ | 
|  | //    +---------v----------+          | | 
|  | //              |                     | | 
|  | //              |                     | | 
|  | //              |     +---------------^-----+ | 
|  | //              |     |                     | | 
|  | //              +----->    .exit.selector   | | 
|  | //                    |                     | | 
|  | //                    +----------v----------+ | 
|  | //                               | | 
|  | //     +--------------------+    | | 
|  | //     |                    |    | | 
|  | //     |   original exit    <----+ | 
|  | //     |                    | | 
|  | //     +--------------------+ | 
|  |  | 
|  | RewrittenRangeInfo RRI; | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *BBInsertLocation = LS.Latch->getNextNode(); | 
|  | RRI.ExitSelector = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, Twine(LS.Tag) + ".exit.selector", | 
|  | &F, BBInsertLocation); | 
|  | RRI.PseudoExit = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, Twine(LS.Tag) + ".pseudo.exit", &F, | 
|  | BBInsertLocation); | 
|  |  | 
|  | BranchInst *PreheaderJump = cast<BranchInst>(Preheader->getTerminator()); | 
|  | bool Increasing = LS.IndVarIncreasing; | 
|  | bool IsSignedPredicate = LS.IsSignedPredicate; | 
|  |  | 
|  | IRBuilder<> B(PreheaderJump); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // EnterLoopCond - is it okay to start executing this `LS'? | 
|  | Value *EnterLoopCond = nullptr; | 
|  | auto Pred = | 
|  | Increasing | 
|  | ? (IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT) | 
|  | : (IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT : ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT); | 
|  | EnterLoopCond = B.CreateICmp(Pred, LS.IndVarStart, ExitSubloopAt); | 
|  |  | 
|  | B.CreateCondBr(EnterLoopCond, LS.Header, RRI.PseudoExit); | 
|  | PreheaderJump->eraseFromParent(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | LS.LatchBr->setSuccessor(LS.LatchBrExitIdx, RRI.ExitSelector); | 
|  | B.SetInsertPoint(LS.LatchBr); | 
|  | Value *TakeBackedgeLoopCond = B.CreateICmp(Pred, LS.IndVarBase, | 
|  | ExitSubloopAt); | 
|  |  | 
|  | Value *CondForBranch = LS.LatchBrExitIdx == 1 | 
|  | ? TakeBackedgeLoopCond | 
|  | : B.CreateNot(TakeBackedgeLoopCond); | 
|  |  | 
|  | LS.LatchBr->setCondition(CondForBranch); | 
|  |  | 
|  | B.SetInsertPoint(RRI.ExitSelector); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // IterationsLeft - are there any more iterations left, given the original | 
|  | // upper bound on the induction variable?  If not, we branch to the "real" | 
|  | // exit. | 
|  | Value *IterationsLeft = B.CreateICmp(Pred, LS.IndVarBase, LS.LoopExitAt); | 
|  | B.CreateCondBr(IterationsLeft, RRI.PseudoExit, LS.LatchExit); | 
|  |  | 
|  | BranchInst *BranchToContinuation = | 
|  | BranchInst::Create(ContinuationBlock, RRI.PseudoExit); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // We emit PHI nodes into `RRI.PseudoExit' that compute the "latest" value of | 
|  | // each of the PHI nodes in the loop header.  This feeds into the initial | 
|  | // value of the same PHI nodes if/when we continue execution. | 
|  | for (PHINode &PN : LS.Header->phis()) { | 
|  | PHINode *NewPHI = PHINode::Create(PN.getType(), 2, PN.getName() + ".copy", | 
|  | BranchToContinuation); | 
|  |  | 
|  | NewPHI->addIncoming(PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(Preheader), Preheader); | 
|  | NewPHI->addIncoming(PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(LS.Latch), | 
|  | RRI.ExitSelector); | 
|  | RRI.PHIValuesAtPseudoExit.push_back(NewPHI); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | RRI.IndVarEnd = PHINode::Create(LS.IndVarBase->getType(), 2, "indvar.end", | 
|  | BranchToContinuation); | 
|  | RRI.IndVarEnd->addIncoming(LS.IndVarStart, Preheader); | 
|  | RRI.IndVarEnd->addIncoming(LS.IndVarBase, RRI.ExitSelector); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // The latch exit now has a branch from `RRI.ExitSelector' instead of | 
|  | // `LS.Latch'.  The PHI nodes need to be updated to reflect that. | 
|  | for (PHINode &PN : LS.LatchExit->phis()) | 
|  | replacePHIBlock(&PN, LS.Latch, RRI.ExitSelector); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return RRI; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | void LoopConstrainer::rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs( | 
|  | LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *ContinuationBlock, | 
|  | const LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo &RRI) const { | 
|  | unsigned PHIIndex = 0; | 
|  | for (PHINode &PN : LS.Header->phis()) | 
|  | for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN.getNumIncomingValues(); i < e; ++i) | 
|  | if (PN.getIncomingBlock(i) == ContinuationBlock) | 
|  | PN.setIncomingValue(i, RRI.PHIValuesAtPseudoExit[PHIIndex++]); | 
|  |  | 
|  | LS.IndVarStart = RRI.IndVarEnd; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *LoopConstrainer::createPreheader(const LoopStructure &LS, | 
|  | BasicBlock *OldPreheader, | 
|  | const char *Tag) const { | 
|  | BasicBlock *Preheader = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, Tag, &F, LS.Header); | 
|  | BranchInst::Create(LS.Header, Preheader); | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (PHINode &PN : LS.Header->phis()) | 
|  | for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN.getNumIncomingValues(); i < e; ++i) | 
|  | replacePHIBlock(&PN, OldPreheader, Preheader); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return Preheader; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | void LoopConstrainer::addToParentLoopIfNeeded(ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> BBs) { | 
|  | Loop *ParentLoop = OriginalLoop.getParentLoop(); | 
|  | if (!ParentLoop) | 
|  | return; | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (BasicBlock *BB : BBs) | 
|  | ParentLoop->addBasicBlockToLoop(BB, LI); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | Loop *LoopConstrainer::createClonedLoopStructure(Loop *Original, Loop *Parent, | 
|  | ValueToValueMapTy &VM, | 
|  | bool IsSubloop) { | 
|  | Loop &New = *LI.AllocateLoop(); | 
|  | if (Parent) | 
|  | Parent->addChildLoop(&New); | 
|  | else | 
|  | LI.addTopLevelLoop(&New); | 
|  | LPMAddNewLoop(&New, IsSubloop); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Add all of the blocks in Original to the new loop. | 
|  | for (auto *BB : Original->blocks()) | 
|  | if (LI.getLoopFor(BB) == Original) | 
|  | New.addBasicBlockToLoop(cast<BasicBlock>(VM[BB]), LI); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Add all of the subloops to the new loop. | 
|  | for (Loop *SubLoop : *Original) | 
|  | createClonedLoopStructure(SubLoop, &New, VM, /* IsSubloop */ true); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return &New; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool LoopConstrainer::run() { | 
|  | BasicBlock *Preheader = nullptr; | 
|  | LatchTakenCount = SE.getExitCount(&OriginalLoop, MainLoopStructure.Latch); | 
|  | Preheader = OriginalLoop.getLoopPreheader(); | 
|  | assert(!isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(LatchTakenCount) && Preheader != nullptr && | 
|  | "preconditions!"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | OriginalPreheader = Preheader; | 
|  | MainLoopPreheader = Preheader; | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool IsSignedPredicate = MainLoopStructure.IsSignedPredicate; | 
|  | Optional<SubRanges> MaybeSR = calculateSubRanges(IsSignedPredicate); | 
|  | if (!MaybeSR.hasValue()) { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not compute subranges\n"); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | SubRanges SR = MaybeSR.getValue(); | 
|  | bool Increasing = MainLoopStructure.IndVarIncreasing; | 
|  | IntegerType *IVTy = | 
|  | cast<IntegerType>(MainLoopStructure.IndVarBase->getType()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | SCEVExpander Expander(SE, F.getParent()->getDataLayout(), "irce"); | 
|  | Instruction *InsertPt = OriginalPreheader->getTerminator(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // It would have been better to make `PreLoop' and `PostLoop' | 
|  | // `Optional<ClonedLoop>'s, but `ValueToValueMapTy' does not have a copy | 
|  | // constructor. | 
|  | ClonedLoop PreLoop, PostLoop; | 
|  | bool NeedsPreLoop = | 
|  | Increasing ? SR.LowLimit.hasValue() : SR.HighLimit.hasValue(); | 
|  | bool NeedsPostLoop = | 
|  | Increasing ? SR.HighLimit.hasValue() : SR.LowLimit.hasValue(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | Value *ExitPreLoopAt = nullptr; | 
|  | Value *ExitMainLoopAt = nullptr; | 
|  | const SCEVConstant *MinusOneS = | 
|  | cast<SCEVConstant>(SE.getConstant(IVTy, -1, true /* isSigned */)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (NeedsPreLoop) { | 
|  | const SCEV *ExitPreLoopAtSCEV = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (Increasing) | 
|  | ExitPreLoopAtSCEV = *SR.LowLimit; | 
|  | else if (cannotBeMinInLoop(*SR.HighLimit, &OriginalLoop, SE, | 
|  | IsSignedPredicate)) | 
|  | ExitPreLoopAtSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(*SR.HighLimit, MinusOneS); | 
|  | else { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove no-overflow when computing " | 
|  | << "preloop exit limit.  HighLimit = " | 
|  | << *(*SR.HighLimit) << "\n"); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!isSafeToExpandAt(ExitPreLoopAtSCEV, InsertPt, SE)) { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove that it is safe to expand the" | 
|  | << " preloop exit limit " << *ExitPreLoopAtSCEV | 
|  | << " at block " << InsertPt->getParent()->getName() | 
|  | << "\n"); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | ExitPreLoopAt = Expander.expandCodeFor(ExitPreLoopAtSCEV, IVTy, InsertPt); | 
|  | ExitPreLoopAt->setName("exit.preloop.at"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (NeedsPostLoop) { | 
|  | const SCEV *ExitMainLoopAtSCEV = nullptr; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (Increasing) | 
|  | ExitMainLoopAtSCEV = *SR.HighLimit; | 
|  | else if (cannotBeMinInLoop(*SR.LowLimit, &OriginalLoop, SE, | 
|  | IsSignedPredicate)) | 
|  | ExitMainLoopAtSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(*SR.LowLimit, MinusOneS); | 
|  | else { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove no-overflow when computing " | 
|  | << "mainloop exit limit.  LowLimit = " | 
|  | << *(*SR.LowLimit) << "\n"); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!isSafeToExpandAt(ExitMainLoopAtSCEV, InsertPt, SE)) { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove that it is safe to expand the" | 
|  | << " main loop exit limit " << *ExitMainLoopAtSCEV | 
|  | << " at block " << InsertPt->getParent()->getName() | 
|  | << "\n"); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | ExitMainLoopAt = Expander.expandCodeFor(ExitMainLoopAtSCEV, IVTy, InsertPt); | 
|  | ExitMainLoopAt->setName("exit.mainloop.at"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // We clone these ahead of time so that we don't have to deal with changing | 
|  | // and temporarily invalid IR as we transform the loops. | 
|  | if (NeedsPreLoop) | 
|  | cloneLoop(PreLoop, "preloop"); | 
|  | if (NeedsPostLoop) | 
|  | cloneLoop(PostLoop, "postloop"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | RewrittenRangeInfo PreLoopRRI; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (NeedsPreLoop) { | 
|  | Preheader->getTerminator()->replaceUsesOfWith(MainLoopStructure.Header, | 
|  | PreLoop.Structure.Header); | 
|  |  | 
|  | MainLoopPreheader = | 
|  | createPreheader(MainLoopStructure, Preheader, "mainloop"); | 
|  | PreLoopRRI = changeIterationSpaceEnd(PreLoop.Structure, Preheader, | 
|  | ExitPreLoopAt, MainLoopPreheader); | 
|  | rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs(MainLoopStructure, MainLoopPreheader, | 
|  | PreLoopRRI); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *PostLoopPreheader = nullptr; | 
|  | RewrittenRangeInfo PostLoopRRI; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (NeedsPostLoop) { | 
|  | PostLoopPreheader = | 
|  | createPreheader(PostLoop.Structure, Preheader, "postloop"); | 
|  | PostLoopRRI = changeIterationSpaceEnd(MainLoopStructure, MainLoopPreheader, | 
|  | ExitMainLoopAt, PostLoopPreheader); | 
|  | rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs(PostLoop.Structure, PostLoopPreheader, | 
|  | PostLoopRRI); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *NewMainLoopPreheader = | 
|  | MainLoopPreheader != Preheader ? MainLoopPreheader : nullptr; | 
|  | BasicBlock *NewBlocks[] = {PostLoopPreheader,        PreLoopRRI.PseudoExit, | 
|  | PreLoopRRI.ExitSelector,  PostLoopRRI.PseudoExit, | 
|  | PostLoopRRI.ExitSelector, NewMainLoopPreheader}; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Some of the above may be nullptr, filter them out before passing to | 
|  | // addToParentLoopIfNeeded. | 
|  | auto NewBlocksEnd = | 
|  | std::remove(std::begin(NewBlocks), std::end(NewBlocks), nullptr); | 
|  |  | 
|  | addToParentLoopIfNeeded(makeArrayRef(std::begin(NewBlocks), NewBlocksEnd)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | DT.recalculate(F); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // We need to first add all the pre and post loop blocks into the loop | 
|  | // structures (as part of createClonedLoopStructure), and then update the | 
|  | // LCSSA form and LoopSimplifyForm. This is necessary for correctly updating | 
|  | // LI when LoopSimplifyForm is generated. | 
|  | Loop *PreL = nullptr, *PostL = nullptr; | 
|  | if (!PreLoop.Blocks.empty()) { | 
|  | PreL = createClonedLoopStructure(&OriginalLoop, | 
|  | OriginalLoop.getParentLoop(), PreLoop.Map, | 
|  | /* IsSubLoop */ false); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!PostLoop.Blocks.empty()) { | 
|  | PostL = | 
|  | createClonedLoopStructure(&OriginalLoop, OriginalLoop.getParentLoop(), | 
|  | PostLoop.Map, /* IsSubLoop */ false); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // This function canonicalizes the loop into Loop-Simplify and LCSSA forms. | 
|  | auto CanonicalizeLoop = [&] (Loop *L, bool IsOriginalLoop) { | 
|  | formLCSSARecursively(*L, DT, &LI, &SE); | 
|  | simplifyLoop(L, &DT, &LI, &SE, nullptr, true); | 
|  | // Pre/post loops are slow paths, we do not need to perform any loop | 
|  | // optimizations on them. | 
|  | if (!IsOriginalLoop) | 
|  | DisableAllLoopOptsOnLoop(*L); | 
|  | }; | 
|  | if (PreL) | 
|  | CanonicalizeLoop(PreL, false); | 
|  | if (PostL) | 
|  | CanonicalizeLoop(PostL, false); | 
|  | CanonicalizeLoop(&OriginalLoop, true); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return true; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /// Computes and returns a range of values for the induction variable (IndVar) | 
|  | /// in which the range check can be safely elided.  If it cannot compute such a | 
|  | /// range, returns None. | 
|  | Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheck::computeSafeIterationSpace( | 
|  | ScalarEvolution &SE, const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar, | 
|  | bool IsLatchSigned) const { | 
|  | // IndVar is of the form "A + B * I" (where "I" is the canonical induction | 
|  | // variable, that may or may not exist as a real llvm::Value in the loop) and | 
|  | // this inductive range check is a range check on the "C + D * I" ("C" is | 
|  | // getBegin() and "D" is getStep()).  We rewrite the value being range | 
|  | // checked to "M + N * IndVar" where "N" = "D * B^(-1)" and "M" = "C - NA". | 
|  | // | 
|  | // The actual inequalities we solve are of the form | 
|  | // | 
|  | //   0 <= M + 1 * IndVar < L given L >= 0  (i.e. N == 1) | 
|  | // | 
|  | // Here L stands for upper limit of the safe iteration space. | 
|  | // The inequality is satisfied by (0 - M) <= IndVar < (L - M). To avoid | 
|  | // overflows when calculating (0 - M) and (L - M) we, depending on type of | 
|  | // IV's iteration space, limit the calculations by borders of the iteration | 
|  | // space. For example, if IndVar is unsigned, (0 - M) overflows for any M > 0. | 
|  | // If we figured out that "anything greater than (-M) is safe", we strengthen | 
|  | // this to "everything greater than 0 is safe", assuming that values between | 
|  | // -M and 0 just do not exist in unsigned iteration space, and we don't want | 
|  | // to deal with overflown values. | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!IndVar->isAffine()) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *A = IndVar->getStart(); | 
|  | const SCEVConstant *B = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(IndVar->getStepRecurrence(SE)); | 
|  | if (!B) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | assert(!B->isZero() && "Recurrence with zero step?"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *C = getBegin(); | 
|  | const SCEVConstant *D = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(getStep()); | 
|  | if (D != B) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  |  | 
|  | assert(!D->getValue()->isZero() && "Recurrence with zero step?"); | 
|  | unsigned BitWidth = cast<IntegerType>(IndVar->getType())->getBitWidth(); | 
|  | const SCEV *SIntMax = SE.getConstant(APInt::getSignedMaxValue(BitWidth)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Subtract Y from X so that it does not go through border of the IV | 
|  | // iteration space. Mathematically, it is equivalent to: | 
|  | // | 
|  | //    ClampedSubtract(X, Y) = min(max(X - Y, INT_MIN), INT_MAX).        [1] | 
|  | // | 
|  | // In [1], 'X - Y' is a mathematical subtraction (result is not bounded to | 
|  | // any width of bit grid). But after we take min/max, the result is | 
|  | // guaranteed to be within [INT_MIN, INT_MAX]. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // In [1], INT_MAX and INT_MIN are respectively signed and unsigned max/min | 
|  | // values, depending on type of latch condition that defines IV iteration | 
|  | // space. | 
|  | auto ClampedSubtract = [&](const SCEV *X, const SCEV *Y) { | 
|  | // FIXME: The current implementation assumes that X is in [0, SINT_MAX]. | 
|  | // This is required to ensure that SINT_MAX - X does not overflow signed and | 
|  | // that X - Y does not overflow unsigned if Y is negative. Can we lift this | 
|  | // restriction and make it work for negative X either? | 
|  | if (IsLatchSigned) { | 
|  | // X is a number from signed range, Y is interpreted as signed. | 
|  | // Even if Y is SINT_MAX, (X - Y) does not reach SINT_MIN. So the only | 
|  | // thing we should care about is that we didn't cross SINT_MAX. | 
|  | // So, if Y is positive, we subtract Y safely. | 
|  | //   Rule 1: Y > 0 ---> Y. | 
|  | // If 0 <= -Y <= (SINT_MAX - X), we subtract Y safely. | 
|  | //   Rule 2: Y >=s (X - SINT_MAX) ---> Y. | 
|  | // If 0 <= (SINT_MAX - X) < -Y, we can only subtract (X - SINT_MAX). | 
|  | //   Rule 3: Y <s (X - SINT_MAX) ---> (X - SINT_MAX). | 
|  | // It gives us smax(Y, X - SINT_MAX) to subtract in all cases. | 
|  | const SCEV *XMinusSIntMax = SE.getMinusSCEV(X, SIntMax); | 
|  | return SE.getMinusSCEV(X, SE.getSMaxExpr(Y, XMinusSIntMax), | 
|  | SCEV::FlagNSW); | 
|  | } else | 
|  | // X is a number from unsigned range, Y is interpreted as signed. | 
|  | // Even if Y is SINT_MIN, (X - Y) does not reach UINT_MAX. So the only | 
|  | // thing we should care about is that we didn't cross zero. | 
|  | // So, if Y is negative, we subtract Y safely. | 
|  | //   Rule 1: Y <s 0 ---> Y. | 
|  | // If 0 <= Y <= X, we subtract Y safely. | 
|  | //   Rule 2: Y <=s X ---> Y. | 
|  | // If 0 <= X < Y, we should stop at 0 and can only subtract X. | 
|  | //   Rule 3: Y >s X ---> X. | 
|  | // It gives us smin(X, Y) to subtract in all cases. | 
|  | return SE.getMinusSCEV(X, SE.getSMinExpr(X, Y), SCEV::FlagNUW); | 
|  | }; | 
|  | const SCEV *M = SE.getMinusSCEV(C, A); | 
|  | const SCEV *Zero = SE.getZero(M->getType()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // This function returns SCEV equal to 1 if X is non-negative 0 otherwise. | 
|  | auto SCEVCheckNonNegative = [&](const SCEV *X) { | 
|  | const Loop *L = IndVar->getLoop(); | 
|  | const SCEV *One = SE.getOne(X->getType()); | 
|  | // Can we trivially prove that X is a non-negative or negative value? | 
|  | if (isKnownNonNegativeInLoop(X, L, SE)) | 
|  | return One; | 
|  | else if (isKnownNegativeInLoop(X, L, SE)) | 
|  | return Zero; | 
|  | // If not, we will have to figure it out during the execution. | 
|  | // Function smax(smin(X, 0), -1) + 1 equals to 1 if X >= 0 and 0 if X < 0. | 
|  | const SCEV *NegOne = SE.getNegativeSCEV(One); | 
|  | return SE.getAddExpr(SE.getSMaxExpr(SE.getSMinExpr(X, Zero), NegOne), One); | 
|  | }; | 
|  | // FIXME: Current implementation of ClampedSubtract implicitly assumes that | 
|  | // X is non-negative (in sense of a signed value). We need to re-implement | 
|  | // this function in a way that it will correctly handle negative X as well. | 
|  | // We use it twice: for X = 0 everything is fine, but for X = getEnd() we can | 
|  | // end up with a negative X and produce wrong results. So currently we ensure | 
|  | // that if getEnd() is negative then both ends of the safe range are zero. | 
|  | // Note that this may pessimize elimination of unsigned range checks against | 
|  | // negative values. | 
|  | const SCEV *REnd = getEnd(); | 
|  | const SCEV *EndIsNonNegative = SCEVCheckNonNegative(REnd); | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *Begin = SE.getMulExpr(ClampedSubtract(Zero, M), EndIsNonNegative); | 
|  | const SCEV *End = SE.getMulExpr(ClampedSubtract(REnd, M), EndIsNonNegative); | 
|  | return InductiveRangeCheck::Range(Begin, End); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | static Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> | 
|  | IntersectSignedRange(ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | const Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> &R1, | 
|  | const InductiveRangeCheck::Range &R2) { | 
|  | if (R2.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ true)) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | if (!R1.hasValue()) | 
|  | return R2; | 
|  | auto &R1Value = R1.getValue(); | 
|  | // We never return empty ranges from this function, and R1 is supposed to be | 
|  | // a result of intersection. Thus, R1 is never empty. | 
|  | assert(!R1Value.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ true) && | 
|  | "We should never have empty R1!"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // TODO: we could widen the smaller range and have this work; but for now we | 
|  | // bail out to keep things simple. | 
|  | if (R1Value.getType() != R2.getType()) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *NewBegin = SE.getSMaxExpr(R1Value.getBegin(), R2.getBegin()); | 
|  | const SCEV *NewEnd = SE.getSMinExpr(R1Value.getEnd(), R2.getEnd()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // If the resulting range is empty, just return None. | 
|  | auto Ret = InductiveRangeCheck::Range(NewBegin, NewEnd); | 
|  | if (Ret.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ true)) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | return Ret; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | static Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> | 
|  | IntersectUnsignedRange(ScalarEvolution &SE, | 
|  | const Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> &R1, | 
|  | const InductiveRangeCheck::Range &R2) { | 
|  | if (R2.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ false)) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | if (!R1.hasValue()) | 
|  | return R2; | 
|  | auto &R1Value = R1.getValue(); | 
|  | // We never return empty ranges from this function, and R1 is supposed to be | 
|  | // a result of intersection. Thus, R1 is never empty. | 
|  | assert(!R1Value.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ false) && | 
|  | "We should never have empty R1!"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // TODO: we could widen the smaller range and have this work; but for now we | 
|  | // bail out to keep things simple. | 
|  | if (R1Value.getType() != R2.getType()) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  |  | 
|  | const SCEV *NewBegin = SE.getUMaxExpr(R1Value.getBegin(), R2.getBegin()); | 
|  | const SCEV *NewEnd = SE.getUMinExpr(R1Value.getEnd(), R2.getEnd()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // If the resulting range is empty, just return None. | 
|  | auto Ret = InductiveRangeCheck::Range(NewBegin, NewEnd); | 
|  | if (Ret.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ false)) | 
|  | return None; | 
|  | return Ret; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | PreservedAnalyses IRCEPass::run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | LoopStandardAnalysisResults &AR, | 
|  | LPMUpdater &U) { | 
|  | Function *F = L.getHeader()->getParent(); | 
|  | const auto &FAM = | 
|  | AM.getResult<FunctionAnalysisManagerLoopProxy>(L, AR).getManager(); | 
|  | auto *BPI = FAM.getCachedResult<BranchProbabilityAnalysis>(*F); | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheckElimination IRCE(AR.SE, BPI, AR.DT, AR.LI); | 
|  | auto LPMAddNewLoop = [&U](Loop *NL, bool IsSubloop) { | 
|  | if (!IsSubloop) | 
|  | U.addSiblingLoops(NL); | 
|  | }; | 
|  | bool Changed = IRCE.run(&L, LPMAddNewLoop); | 
|  | if (!Changed) | 
|  | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses(); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool IRCELegacyPass::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) { | 
|  | if (skipLoop(L)) | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | ScalarEvolution &SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE(); | 
|  | BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI = | 
|  | getAnalysis<BranchProbabilityInfoWrapperPass>().getBPI(); | 
|  | auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); | 
|  | auto &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheckElimination IRCE(SE, &BPI, DT, LI); | 
|  | auto LPMAddNewLoop = [&LPM](Loop *NL, bool /* IsSubLoop */) { | 
|  | LPM.addLoop(*NL); | 
|  | }; | 
|  | return IRCE.run(L, LPMAddNewLoop); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | bool InductiveRangeCheckElimination::run( | 
|  | Loop *L, function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop) { | 
|  | if (L->getBlocks().size() >= LoopSizeCutoff) { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: giving up constraining loop, too large\n"); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader(); | 
|  | if (!Preheader) { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: loop has no preheader, leaving\n"); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | LLVMContext &Context = Preheader->getContext(); | 
|  | SmallVector<InductiveRangeCheck, 16> RangeChecks; | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (auto BBI : L->getBlocks()) | 
|  | if (BranchInst *TBI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BBI->getTerminator())) | 
|  | InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromBranch(TBI, L, SE, BPI, | 
|  | RangeChecks); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (RangeChecks.empty()) | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | auto PrintRecognizedRangeChecks = [&](raw_ostream &OS) { | 
|  | OS << "irce: looking at loop "; L->print(OS); | 
|  | OS << "irce: loop has " << RangeChecks.size() | 
|  | << " inductive range checks: \n"; | 
|  | for (InductiveRangeCheck &IRC : RangeChecks) | 
|  | IRC.print(OS); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(PrintRecognizedRangeChecks(dbgs())); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (PrintRangeChecks) | 
|  | PrintRecognizedRangeChecks(errs()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | const char *FailureReason = nullptr; | 
|  | Optional<LoopStructure> MaybeLoopStructure = | 
|  | LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(SE, BPI, *L, FailureReason); | 
|  | if (!MaybeLoopStructure.hasValue()) { | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not parse loop structure: " | 
|  | << FailureReason << "\n";); | 
|  | return false; | 
|  | } | 
|  | LoopStructure LS = MaybeLoopStructure.getValue(); | 
|  | const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar = | 
|  | cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarBase), SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarStep))); | 
|  |  | 
|  | Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> SafeIterRange; | 
|  | Instruction *ExprInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | SmallVector<InductiveRangeCheck, 4> RangeChecksToEliminate; | 
|  | // Basing on the type of latch predicate, we interpret the IV iteration range | 
|  | // as signed or unsigned range. We use different min/max functions (signed or | 
|  | // unsigned) when intersecting this range with safe iteration ranges implied | 
|  | // by range checks. | 
|  | auto IntersectRange = | 
|  | LS.IsSignedPredicate ? IntersectSignedRange : IntersectUnsignedRange; | 
|  |  | 
|  | IRBuilder<> B(ExprInsertPt); | 
|  | for (InductiveRangeCheck &IRC : RangeChecks) { | 
|  | auto Result = IRC.computeSafeIterationSpace(SE, IndVar, | 
|  | LS.IsSignedPredicate); | 
|  | if (Result.hasValue()) { | 
|  | auto MaybeSafeIterRange = | 
|  | IntersectRange(SE, SafeIterRange, Result.getValue()); | 
|  | if (MaybeSafeIterRange.hasValue()) { | 
|  | assert( | 
|  | !MaybeSafeIterRange.getValue().isEmpty(SE, LS.IsSignedPredicate) && | 
|  | "We should never return empty ranges!"); | 
|  | RangeChecksToEliminate.push_back(IRC); | 
|  | SafeIterRange = MaybeSafeIterRange.getValue(); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (!SafeIterRange.hasValue()) | 
|  | return false; | 
|  |  | 
|  | LoopConstrainer LC(*L, LI, LPMAddNewLoop, LS, SE, DT, | 
|  | SafeIterRange.getValue()); | 
|  | bool Changed = LC.run(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (Changed) { | 
|  | auto PrintConstrainedLoopInfo = [L]() { | 
|  | dbgs() << "irce: in function "; | 
|  | dbgs() << L->getHeader()->getParent()->getName() << ": "; | 
|  | dbgs() << "constrained "; | 
|  | L->print(dbgs()); | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | LLVM_DEBUG(PrintConstrainedLoopInfo()); | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (PrintChangedLoops) | 
|  | PrintConstrainedLoopInfo(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Optimize away the now-redundant range checks. | 
|  |  | 
|  | for (InductiveRangeCheck &IRC : RangeChecksToEliminate) { | 
|  | ConstantInt *FoldedRangeCheck = IRC.getPassingDirection() | 
|  | ? ConstantInt::getTrue(Context) | 
|  | : ConstantInt::getFalse(Context); | 
|  | IRC.getCheckUse()->set(FoldedRangeCheck); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | return Changed; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | Pass *llvm::createInductiveRangeCheckEliminationPass() { | 
|  | return new IRCELegacyPass(); | 
|  | } |