)]}'
{
  "commit": "1f2d7db11215fcbf34f82a2a5f910e09edf1176f",
  "tree": "b60b195d0c24b4c1159cc34d464c1e75b10db64b",
  "parents": [
    "20f111f0d8d3abbb32b3f6c7a58d1c0659f335ba",
    "f5f91cc4a740dace9a882d35d5e28dc6d4aefe56"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Stuart Cook",
    "email": "Zalathar@users.noreply.github.com",
    "time": "Thu Nov 13 11:57:09 2025 +1100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "GitHub",
    "email": "noreply@github.com",
    "time": "Thu Nov 13 11:57:09 2025 +1100"
  },
  "message": "Rollup merge of #148846 - folkertdev:tail-call-rpit, r\u003dWaffleLapkin\n\nadd a test for combining RPIT with explicit tail calls\n\ntracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112788\nfixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139305\n\nCombining return position impl trait (RPIT) with guaranteed tail calls does not currently work, but at least it does not ICE any more.\n\nUsing RPIT probably should work, see also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144953.\n\nThe snippet in the issue is not valid for a variety of reasons, and based on the assert that got triggered the ICE was just any `-\u003e impl Trait` at all, so I\u0027ve made a minimal example using RPIT.\n\nr? `@WaffleLapkin`\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}