)]}'
{
  "commit": "1700a21d10b52b4d5563d3a0066022a12dc105c2",
  "tree": "53f41f97f98abd0be3448036b369f64fed5406e7",
  "parents": [
    "d83352b491e1c3f60791ce51617a4df8dc6cc718",
    "6bcd172f5a82fa3bb508bbecf2d5d9777a3473e6"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Jacob Pratt",
    "email": "jacob@jhpratt.dev",
    "time": "Sat Apr 11 21:12:20 2026 -0400"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "GitHub",
    "email": "noreply@github.com",
    "time": "Sat Apr 11 21:12:20 2026 -0400"
  },
  "message": "Rollup merge of #155126 - folkertdev:target-object-format, r\u003dUrgau\n\nadd `cfg(target_object_format \u003d \"...\")`\n\ntracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/152586\n\nI\u0027m implementing the predicate as `target_object_format`, because that\u0027s what is useful to me (for testing `#[link_section \u003d \"...\"]` where `mach-o` has some extra restrictions) and maps cleanly to the `BinaryFormat` enum that is used internally. There is still room for a future `target_executable_format` when there is a use case.\n\ncc @joshtriplett as the lang sponsor of this feature, @workingjubilee as the author of the proposal.\n\nr? JonathanBrouwer a sidequest from the sidequest that is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155065\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}