)]}'
{
  "commit": "f17d64b15871683fe7be83c43aaf33622f8eaec2",
  "tree": "dfc5e5244e50083ed7c182213339162a1ef04b43",
  "parents": [
    "b9eae883365f34bf63d86b113d78f409be79534c"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "emresimsek",
    "email": "emresimsek2013@gmail.com",
    "time": "Sat Aug 29 14:03:11 2026 +0300"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "emresimsek",
    "email": "emresimsek2013@gmail.com",
    "time": "Sat Aug 29 14:03:11 2026 +0300"
  },
  "message": "tests: cover the reported reproducer and both namespaces\n\n`resolves_in` derives the namespace it looks a path up in from the\n`DefKind` of the item, so a type and a value constructor take different\npaths through it. Import the `Bound` variants the issue reported\nalongside the type, and keep a lint expectation on both through\n`std::ops`, so that a regression in either namespace shows up.\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "20e7a2e9979c409ab36dad5ae885aabbcd174c70",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.fixed",
      "new_id": "c162dcb0451e2657bea3350305b87ec8e662d441",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.fixed"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "5fe64ce018601b8aa13410dd0af0e88c3bdb0f02",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.rs",
      "new_id": "6769af11def6f3034e576c91d2e7b21472b6e359",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.rs"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "7045d4448211404b0ce79bf9e30f03a4b83c8b17",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.stderr",
      "new_id": "ae0783863fbc2bce3106cb46b29c1c4527eba7a8",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.stderr"
    }
  ]
}
